Skip to main content

Intel may slash CPU prices in late 2020 to counter AMD’s Zen 3 chips

 

Intel will reportedly cut the prices of its CPUs in the second half of the year in order to stay competitive with AMD’s next-generation Zen 3 CPUs, which are expected to debut in the latter months of 2020. Although traditionally a rarity for Intel, if this report proves accurate, it would be the second major price cut of Intel’s CPUs in a year, following the slashing of its HEDT chip prices in late-2019.

Recommended Videos

Traditionally AMD has been the company that has cut prices to remain relevant in the CPU space, offering bang-for-buck at the low-end, while Intel could effectively set its prices to whatever it wanted, with a near-monopoly on high-end performance. But over the past few years, that paradigm has shifted, and with the great success of AMD’s Ryzen 3000 desktop CPUs, it’s almost become reversed. Ryzen 4000 CPUs with Zen 3 cores may have Intel so worried that it cuts prices for even more CPUs.

Prior to the launch of its 10th-generation Cascade Lake-X HEDT CPUs, Intel cut its typical pricing in half, selling the flagship 10980XE for just $980, where its predecessors debuted at $2,000 each. This was an attempt to counter AMD’s Threadripper 3000 debut, which while suddenly more costly than the Intel alternative, easily outpaced them in the kinds of multithreaded workloads they’re both designed to tackle. They were even decent at gaming too. The 64-core 3990X debut in January put the final nail in Intel’s HEDT coffin.

DigitTimes latest report suggests that Intel will perform similar cost-cutting measures for a wider range of its CPUs, citing sources within the PC system builder industry. It doesn’t go into detail about which CPUs, although it would presumably relate to its upcoming Comet Lake-S CPUs, which are expected to be faster than Intel’s ninth-generation chips, but not by much. Clock speeds are set to increase at the expense of power and thermals, with hyperthreading support extended to the entire lineup. But that’s about it.

With rumors of Zen 3 performance increasing instructions per clock and clock speeds beyond that of Zen 2 Ryzen 3000 CPUs, Intel may well need to cut prices to remain remotely relevant toward the end of the year.

Jon Martindale
Jon Martindale is a freelance evergreen writer and occasional section coordinator, covering how to guides, best-of lists, and…
Intel announces sudden departure of CEO amid financial turmoil
Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger holding a chip.

Intel has announced that CEO Pat Gelsinger has retired. The executive, who first joined Intel in 1979 at 18 years old, is being replaced by David Zinsner and Michelle Johnston Holthaus. Holthaus and Zinsner will serve as interim co-CEOs while the board of directors works "diligently and expeditiously" to find a successor.

Gelsinger became CEO in early 2021. At the time, Intel was struggling to regain ground it had lost to AMD in the desktop market, as well as push a more ambitious manufacturing timeline to catch up with foreign chipmakers like TSMC. Under Gelsinger's leadership, the company made some big strides. Intel's 12th generation of processors marked a significant turning point in the company's desktop processors, and an aggressive foundry roadmap has pushed smaller nodes out of U.S.-based plants.

Read more
AMD Ryzen AI claimed to offer ‘up to 75% faster gaming’ than Intel
A render of the new Ryzen AI 300 chip on a gradient background.

AMD has just unveiled some internal benchmarks of its Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 processor. Although it's been a few months since the release of the Ryzen AI 300 series, AMD now compares its CPU to Intel's Lunar Lake, and the benchmarks are highly favorable for AMD's best processor for thin-and-light laptops. Let's check them out.

For starters, AMD compared the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 to the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V. The AMD CPU comes with 12 cores (four Zen 5 and eight Zen 5c cores) and 24 threads, as well as 36MB of combined cache. The maximum clock speed tops out at 5.1GHz, and the CPU offers a configurable thermal design power (TDP) ranging from 15 watts to 54W. Meanwhile, the Intel chip sports eight cores (four performance cores and four efficiency cores), eight threads, a max frequency of 4.8GHz, 12MB of cache, and a TDP ranging from 17W to 37W. Both come with a neural processing unit (NPU), and AMD scores a win here too, as its NPU provides 50 trillion operations per second (TOPS), while Intel's sits at 47 TOPS. It's a small difference, though.

Read more
Intel admits defeat on Arrow Lake — but it’s not down for the count
intel core ultra 5 245k review 4

Intel's Arrow Lake CPUs aren't off to a great start. As you can read in our Core Ultra 9 285K review and Core Ultra 5 245K review, Intel's latest CPUs miss the mark across productivity and gaming apps, and they're miles away from some of the best processors you can buy right now. According to Intel, there are several issues with the new platform that it plans to address within a matter of weeks.

In an interview with HotHardware, Intel's Robert Hallock was blunt about the release of Arrow Lake CPUs: "The launch didn't go as planned ... we have a number of things we got to go fix." Hallock, formerly of AMD, is near the top of Intel's technical marketing division. Although he didn't address exactly what's wrong with Arrow Lake, Hallock promised that Intel is working on updates that could significantly improve performance, and that they'll arrive in a matter of weeks.

Read more