Skip to main content

Razer Blade 14 vs. MacBook Pro 14

The 14-inch laptop has become increasingly popular in recent years by offering a larger display than 13-inch machines in a much smaller chassis than 15-inch and larger laptops. And two of the best are the Razer Blade 14 and the Apple MacBook Pro 14.

The Blade 14 took its place at the top of our list of best gaming laptops, offering incredible performance in a svelte chassis that no other gaming machine can match. At the same time, the MacBook Pro 14 has taken the market by storm thanks to its incredibly fast Apple M1 Pro and M1 Max CPUs that also offer some of the best battery life around. It sits at the top of our list of best 14-inch laptops. Which of these outstanding 14-inch laptops is right for you?

Specs

  Razer Blade 14 Apple MacBook Pro 14
Dimensions 12.59 inches x 8.66 inches x 0.66 inches 12.31 inches x 8.71 inches x 0.61 inches
Weight 3.92 pounds 3.5 pounds
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX Apple M1 Pro
Apple M1 Max
Graphics Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080
Integrated
RAM 16GB 16GB
32GB
64GB
Display 14.0-inch Full HD (1,920 x 1,080) IPS 144Hz
14.0-inch QHD (2,560 x 1,440) IPS 165Hz
14.2-inch 16:10 Liquid Retina XDR 3,024 x 1,964
Storage 1TB solid-state drive 512GB SSD
1TB SSD
2TB SSD
4TB SSD
8TB SSD
Touch Optional No
Ports 2 x USB-A 3.2 Gen 2
2 x USB-C 3.2 Gen 2
1 x HDMI 2.1
3.5mm audio jack
3x USB-C with Thunderbolt 4
HDMI 2.0
3.5mm audio jack
SD card reader
Wireless Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.0 Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.0
Webcam 720p 1080p
Operating system Windows 10 Home MacOS Monterey
Battery 61.6 watt-hour 70 watt-hour
Price $1,800+ $1,999+
Rating 4.5 out of 5 stars 5 out of 5 stars

Design

Razer Blade 14 angled view showing display and keyboard deck.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

The Razer Blade 14 follows the same minimalist, all-black aesthetic as the rest of the range, with simple lines and only a green snake logo on the lid, adding some splash. In fact, one might say that its design objective is to match the Apple MacBook’s understated elegance. Outside of its silver color scheme, the MacBook Pro 14 looks a lot like the Blade 14 (or perhaps it’s the other way around), with a similar minimalist aesthetic that avoids any bling. Both are attractive machines, and choosing between them comes down to a preference in color.

Both laptops are also incredibly well-built, constructed from CNC machined aluminum. You won’t find any bending, flexing, or twisting in either laptop — they’re both among the best-built laptops you can buy. This is another criterion that does not assist in choosing between the two.

However, when it comes to the keyboard, there’s a clear distinction. Sure, the Blade 14 has per-key RGB lighting with 15 levels of brightness and a comfortable design with large keycaps and plenty of spacing. The switches are also very good and rank among the best you’ll find on a Windows laptop. However, the MacBook Pro 14 benefits from Apple’s Magic Keyboard, which replaced the butterfly keyboard, a source of tremendous controversy on earlier MacBooks. The Magic Keyboard doesn’t have a ton of travel, but its switches are incredibly precise with the perfect bottoming action, making for the best keyboard you can get on a laptop on any platform.

The touchpad is another distinct win for the MacBook Pro 14. Its large Force Touch haptic touchpad is sensitive, responds to clicks on every square millimeter of its smooth surface, and so closely mimics a physical touchpad that you can’t tell the difference. The Blade 14’s touchpad is very good for a Windows laptop, but it can’t match the MacBook’s.

Connectivity also favors the MacBook Pro 14. It offers three USB-C ports with Thunderbolt 4 support, an HDMI 2.0 port, a 3.5mm audio jack, and an SD card reader. The Blade 14 has two USB-A 3.2 Gen 2 ports, two USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 ports (without Thunderbolt 4 support thanks to the AMD chipset), an HDMI 2.1 port, and a 3.5mm audio jack. There’s no SD card reader available, which is disappointing. Both laptops offer Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.0 for wireless connectivity.

Performance

Razer Blade 14 side view showing display angle and ports.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

The Blade 14 uses AMD’s fast Ryzen 9 5900HX CPU, an 8-core/16-thread chip that provides some of the best processor performance in Windows machines. In our review unit, the Ryzen CPU was paired with an Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 GPU. You can configure the Blade 14 with up to an RTX 3080 for incredibly fast GPU performance in a relatively small package. We reviewed the MacBook Pro 16 with the Apple M1 Pro with a 10-core CPU (eight performance cores and two efficiency cores) and a 16-core GPU, which is available in the MacBook Pro 14, and both can be configured with up to an M1 Max with a 10-core CPU and a 32-core GPU. For this comparison, we’ll assume that the MacBook Pro 14 will be slightly slower than the 16-inch version but that the performance scores would be close enough to draw some conclusions.

In Cinebench R23, a rendering benchmark that’s CPU-intensive, the Blade 14 scored 1,434 in single-core mode and 11,226 in multi-core mode. That’s a fast score for a Windows laptop. The MacBook Pro 16 with the M1 Pro scored 1,531 and 12,343, respectively. Allowing for a slight decrease with the MacBook Pro 14 makes the two laptops evenly matched in this benchmark. Configure the MacBook Pro 14 with the M1 Max, however, and it will be significantly faster.

In the real-world Pugetbench Premiere Pro benchmark, which runs in a live version of Adobe Premiere Pro, the MacBook Pro 16 with the M1 Pro scored 956 compared to the Blade 14’s 537. That’s an impressive result, even assuming the MacBook Pro 14 is slightly slower. Premiere Pro can take advantage of discrete GPUs, and the RTX 3070 is faster than the M1 Pro’s integrated GPU.

The only area where the Blade 14 will have a distinct performance advantage is in gaming. If you want a laptop that’s fast for both creative work and for gaming, then Razer’s laptop is a solid choice. However, if you’re strictly a creator, the MacBook Pro 14 will provide better overall performance. Note that Razer has recently introduced a Blade 14 with the new AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX CPU that’s likely to be significantly faster than the version we reviewed, but we don’t yet have benchmarks on that machine.

Display

Apple MacBook Pro 14 front view showing display.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

The Blade 14 has two display options, a 14.0-inch Full HD (1,920 x 1,080) IPS panel running at 144Hz and a 14.0-inch QHD (2560 x 1440) IPS screen running at 165Hz. We reviewed the latter, and it provided wide and fairly accurate colors at 90% of AdobeRGB and 100% of sRGB with an accuracy of DeltaE 1.54 (1.0 or less is considered excellent). However, its brightness was relatively low at 315 nits, and its contrast was also low at 830:1 (we like to see 1,000:1 or more). It’s a great display for gamers, especially given the fast 165Hz refresh rate, but it might not provide the color accuracy and contrast that creators seek.

The MacBook Pro 14 has just one display option, a 14.2-inch Liquid Retina XDR display (mini-LED) at 3024 x 1964 running at 120Hz. We’ll assume that it provides the same quality as the MacBook Pro 16’s display, which is larger but uses the same technology. That display provided 475 nits of brightness, 95% of AdobeRGB and 100% of sRGB with an accuracy of 1.04, and a 475,200:1 contrast ratio for inky blacks.

The MacBook Pro 14’s display is excellent for creators and anyone else who wants a bright and color-accurate display with deep contrast. It also benefits from its 16:10 aspect ratio that’s more productivity-friendly than the Razer 14’s old-school 16:9 aspect ratio.

Portability

Apple MacBook Pro 14 side views showing ports.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

In width and depth, the Blade 14 and MacBook Pro 14 are within fractions of an inch of each other. The MacBook is slightly thinner at 0.61 inches versus 0.66 inches and lighter at 3.5 pounds versus 3.92 pounds. Both laptops are thin and light enough to carry around without breaking your back, and they’re close enough that you likely wouldn’t be able to tell the difference.

Battery life is another matter entirely, however. The Blade 14 lasted 8.25 hours in our web browsing test that cycles through a series of popular and complex websites and 11 hours on our video test that loops a local Full HD Avengers trailer. Those aren’t bad scores for a Windows gaming laptop. However, the MacBook Pro 14 will last significantly longer on a charge. The MacBook Pro 16 made it to 18.5 hours in our web browsing test and 23 hours in our video test. According to Apple, the 14-inch MacBook should get three hours less in web browsing and four hours less in video playback. Going by those numbers, the MacBook Pro 14 should last for about 15 hours in our web browsing test and 19 hours in our video test.

That’s almost twice the longevity from the MacBook Pro 14. You get a ton of power with incredible battery life from Apple’s machine, and the Blade 14 can’t keep up.

The MacBook Pro 14 is the better all-around laptop

The Razer Blade 14 has an entry-level price of $2,000 for a Ryzen 9 6900HX, 16GB of RAM, a 1TB solid-state drive (SSD), an Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060, and a 14-inch Full HD 144Hz display. At the top end, you’ll spend $3,500 for a Ryzen 9 6900HX, 16GB of RAM, a 1TB SSD, an RTX 3080 Ti, and a 14-inch QHD 165Hz display. It’s not an inexpensive laptop by any means.

The MacBook Pro 14 starts at $1,999 with an 8-core CPU/16-core GPU M1 Pro, 16GB of RAM, and a 512GB SSD. You can spend as much as a whopping $5,899 for a 10-core CPU/32-core GPU M1 Max, 64GB of RAM, and a massive 8TB SSD. The MacBook Pro 14 ranges from a distinctly premium laptop to an incredibly expensive machine.

If you’re a gamer who wants a fast machine for productivity and creativity, then the Razer Blade 14 is a great option. However, for most users, particularly creators, the MacBook Pro 14 offers better all-around performance, exceptional battery life, and a much better display, making it the overall winner.

Editors' Recommendations

Mark Coppock
Mark has been a geek since MS-DOS gave way to Windows and the PalmPilot was a thing. He’s translated his love for…
The best MacBook to buy in 2024
Apple MacBook Pro 16 downward view showing keyboard and speaker.

Now that Apple has started outfitting its laptops with its M3 generation of chips, it's time to take another look at which is the best MacBook to buy in 2024. That’s not always easy, though, as buying the newest MacBook isn’t always the right decision. Apple has several tiers of performance, as well as various sizes, which can further complicate the matter.

What’s more, you can also still get M1 and M2 MacBooks, some from Apple’s own website and some from third-party retailers. But are they still worth your money? Our guide should help you decide.

Read more
How to connect a MacBook to a TV
MacBook on a chair with the TV app on the screen.

Apple’s MacBooks are excellent content-consumption machines, but even the roomiest 16-inch MacBook Pro can’t compare to viewing your favorite shows on a large TV. Whether you’re watching a movie or playing one of the best Mac games, it’s much better to enjoy it on a spacious TV than on a constrained MacBook display.

Read more
If you buy one MacBook Air alternative, make it this one
The MacBook Air on a white table.

I see you. You're considering a flashy new MacBook Air -- perhaps one of the new M3 models or even the cheaper M2 configurations. I'm not going to sit here and pretend like that isn't a wise option to consider for your next laptop. These are excellent laptops, and that M2 model in particular is a solid value at a starting price of $999.

But let me make an appeal to you about a laptop that upends the value proposition of the MacBook Air in a number of ways. The laptop I'm talking about is the Asus Zenbook 14 OLED (Q425MA). This is a laptop we reviewed earlier this year, but it continues to be the king of value. No other laptop you can buy right now offers this much bang for your buck -- the MacBook Air included.

Read more