Skip to main content

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

AMD’s RX 470 sets its sights on 1080p gaming for less than $200

We’ve known about the RX 480’s younger siblings, the RX 470 and 460, for quite some time. Details on the card’s performance, feature set, and price point – pretty much everything about the cards – were lacking. Today, the RX 470 launches in earnest, and the shroud is lifted on one of the new budget-friendly cards.

The beating heart of the RX 470 is 2,048 Stream Processors with a 926MHz base clock, and a 1,206MHz boost clock in the reference version. AMD has chosen a full four gigabytes of GDDR5 for the mid-range offering, clocked at up to 1,750MHz. AIB partners are also available in the typical selection of overclocked flavors.

Recommended Videos

This is, of course, a GPU based on the 14nm FinFET die size, in what AMD refers to as the Polaris architecture. That means a rich feature set, including DirectX 12 optimization, FreeSync, Eyefinity, and support for the new Vulkan graphics API.

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

Most of the offerings are full-length, double-wide cards. Our review unit happens to be a Sapphire OC with a reference-style cooler, and it’s 9.5 inches long, the same length as the RX 480, with the same short PCB and extended cooler. The 120W TDP means the card needs some help from a six-pin PCIe power connection. Like most cards, ours is equipped with an HDMI 2.0b port, and a trio of DisplayPort 1.4 outputs.

We have a full review coming early next week, but to tide you over until then, we do have a little taste to share from our ongoing performance testing. Installed in our X99 test system, the RX 470 scored 9,215 in 3DMark’s Fire Strike benchmark, about 14 percent behind the RX 480.

For the real-world gaming tests and comparative performance results, you’ll have to wait until next week. The card is available now for a suggested $179 retail price, just $20 short of the vanilla RX 480 – if you can find it. At publish, all five RX 470 models on Newegg, which cost between $179 and $240, are sold out.

Buy on Newegg

Brad Bourque
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Brad Bourque is a native Portlander, devout nerd, and craft beer enthusiast. He studied creative writing at Willamette…
AMD might admit defeat, but it’s for the best
RX 7900 XTX and RX 7900 XT on a pink background.

Rumor has it that AMD might be stepping away from the idea of making high-end graphics cards in the next generation. Instead, it appears that its upcoming Radeon RX 8000 series GPUs might be tailored to fit the mainstream segment, with no high-end options to match the level of the RX 7900 XTX and beyond.

For generations, PC gamers have gathered in their camps to trade blows on if Nvidia or AMD is better, and most of that conversation centers around the most powerful GPUs these brands have to offer. If AMD decides to ditch that fight, though, it might be the best move Team Red has ever made.
Change of plans?

Read more
I wanted to try AMD, but it’s making it hard for me to switch
RX 7900 XTX and RX 7900 XT on a pink background.

In my next PC build, I really wanted to give AMD a proper try once again. Unfortunately, Team Red is not making it easy for me to give up Nvidia, and I say that as a person who is very much disillusioned with Nvidia's current strategy of GPU releases.

I had high expectations for AMD in this generation of graphics cards. Was I too hopeful, or is AMD simply content with taking a back seat?
The competition is really not that fierce

Read more
AMD might crush Nvidia with its laptop GPUs — but it’s silent on the desktop front
A woman sits by a desk and plays a game on a laptop equipped with an AMD processor.

AMD's graphics card lineup for laptops is on the way, and by the sound of it, it's shaping up to be pretty exciting -- and it's already bigger than Team Red's current desktop range.

According to a recent leak, AMD may even be able to rival Nvidia's best desktop GPUs with its Navi 32 cards. But where are the desktop equivalents?

Read more