Skip to main content

Samsung’s new Odyssey Neo G9 gaming monitor is beautiful, but it has a fatal flaw

At CES 2023, I had a chance to look at Samsung’s upcoming Odyssey Neo G9. It’s a monster gaming monitor, and you don’t need to look further than the spec sheet to see that. Dual 4K resolution, a 240Hz refresh rate, and a 32:9 aspect ratio with a 57-inch screen? There’s a lot to love.

And after seeing it, I was floored by the quality. It’s an insane gaming monitor that looks fantastic, and I can’t wait to use one for an extended period of time. But there’s a big problem with the new Odyssey Neo G9, and it could be dead on arrival.

DisplayPort 2.1

A mini DisplayPort cable with the DP80 badge.

DisplayPort 2.1. We’ve been talking about it for over a year, and even more so after AMD announced its RX 7900 XTX and RX 7900 XT graphics cards would support the standard. The new Odyssey Neo G9 is the first monitor we’ve seen that supports DisplayPort 2.1, and that’s a surprising problem.

First, the why. The Odyssey Neo G9 comes with a dual 4K resolution, with a pixel count of 7680 x 2160. If you can’t recognize the math, that’s two 3840 x 2160 (4K) screens put side-by-side. Samsung is billing this as an 8K monitor, but it’s not true 8K. It has half the vertical resolution.

Advertising shenanigans aside, the new Odyssey Neo G9 needs DisplayPort 2.1. It runs at a 240Hz refresh rate, and when paired with the resolution, it needs a bandwidth of 36.19Gbps with HDR off and 45Gbps with HDR on. That’s with full compression, too. The actual data rate is much higher.

Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 (2023) playing a racing simulator.

The previous standard, DisplayPort 1.4a, only supports up to 25.92Gbps, so you need DisplayPort 2.1 to drive the Odyssey Neo G9 (2023) at its full resolution and refresh rate. The problem is that only AMD and Intel actually support DisplayPort 2.1 right now.

Nvidia’s latest GPUs top out at DisplayPort 1.4a. They’ll work with the Odyssey Neo G9 due to DisplayPort’s backward compatibility, but not at the full resolution or refresh rate. Worse, Nvidia’s GPUs are the only ones powerful enough to drive the resolution and refresh rate of the Odyssey Neo G9; they’re just hampered by the connection standard.

Limited potential

Two AMD Radeon RX 7000 graphics cards on a pink surface.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

For as powerful as AMD’s RX 7900 XTX is, it’s nowhere near the RTX 4090. Even at standard 4K, the RX 7900 XTX will hover around 60 frames per second (fps) to 100 fps in the most demanding games, far below the refresh rate that Samsung’s monitor is capable of. The RTX 4090, by comparison, easily cracks 100 fps in most games at 4K and often goes higher.

Intel isn’t even a factor in this conversation, either. For as impressive as the Arc A770 and A750 are, they’re targeting 1080p gaming. They’re not powerful enough to drive 4K, let alone dual 4K.

And for the full refresh rate, the RTX 4090 supports Nvidia’s Deep Learning Super Sampling 3 (DLSS). With DLSS 3’s unique frame generation capabilities, it can easily push into the 200 fps territory, even with a resolution as high as the new Odyssey Neo G9 demands. Frankly, the RTX 4090 is the only GPU that makes sense with Samsung’s latest display.

We’ll never get to see it in its full glory, though. Locked to DisplayPort 1.4a, the RTX 4090 can’t drive the Odyssey Neo G9 at its full resolution and refresh rate, despite the fact that it’s the only GPU theoretically powerful enough to. It’s a mismatch, where the highest-end monitor you can buy in 2023 doesn’t have a GPU even capable of fully showing it off.

Lies of P running on the Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 (2023).

I don’t want to discredit how great the monitor looks, though. VESA, who created the DisplayHDR standard, allowed me to play a bit of the upcoming Lies of P game with an RX 7900 XTX and the Odyssey Neo G9 (2023), and it looked fantastic. The game looked like it was running above 60 fps at native resolution, and it looked impossibly sharp for such a large screen.

Make no mistake, the Odyssey Neo G9 is still an end-game gaming monitor. It’s just such a shame that the RTX 4090 can’t fully drive it.

Although I’ve focused on the Odyssey Neo G9 here, it’s important to point out that the problem with DisplayPort 2.1 and its limited support on GPUs isn’t on Samsung’s shoulders. If anything, I commend Samsung for driving this new connection standard forward. The problem here is Nvidia’s poor foresight concerning its RTX 40-series GPUs.

I’m looking forward to the new Odyssey Neo G9, and I’ll be happy to drive the display with an RX 7900 XTX once the monitor has been released. However, Samsung’s new Odyssey OLED G9 looks like the winner in 2023, not because it’s inherently better than the Neo G9, but because the best graphics cards can actually drive the display at its full potential.

Editors' Recommendations

Jacob Roach
Senior Staff Writer, Computing
Jacob Roach is a writer covering computing and gaming at Digital Trends. After realizing Crysis wouldn't run on a laptop, he…
The Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 is the new benchmark for 4K monitors — and I saw it
Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 gaming monitor.

Multiple companies came out with high refresh rate 4K monitors during CES 2022. Acer, for example, debuted the world's first 4K monitor with a 165Hz refresh rate. But then Samsung showed up, and the company clearly wasn't content to end CES 2022 quietly.

Amid announcements of  "world's first" 4K gaming tech, Samsung blew away everything with a 4K monitor that can run at 240Hz: The Odyssey Neo G8. It's not practical at the start of 2022, but it's the new benchmark that high-end gaming displays will need to measure up to.

Read more
Samsung’s Odyssey Neo G8 monitor has highest refresh rate of any 4K display
New Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 monitor seen from the side and from behind.

Samsung has just unveiled a one-of-a-kind curved gaming monitor during CES 2022, dubbed the Samsung Odyssey Neo G8.

This 32-inch screen offers 4K gaming with an unprecedented refresh rate of 240Hz, making it the first screen in the world with that high of a refresh rate at this resolution.

Read more
I just spent over $1,000 on a gaming monitor and here’s why you should too
Front view of Samsung's new QLED Odyssey gaming monitor sitting on desk.

Every year during the Black Friday deals bonanza, I tell myself I’m not going to spend any money on new gaming equipment, especially not a new monitor. After all, I have a 3440 x 1440, 34-inch ultrawide RTX 2080 Super, giving me plenty of power to handle any game I throw at it, right? Wrong.

One $1,100 investment later, and I’m now the proud owner of the Samsung Odyssey G9 arguably one of the best ultrawide gaming monitors on the market next to Samsung’s own Odyssey G9 Neo, which is also on sale for a princely $2,000. The latter is too rich for my blood, but the Odyssey G9 has enough going for it that I didn’t think twice about clicking the “Buy” button.

Read more