Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. News

Vision Pro durability test turns up a few surprises

Add as a preferred source on Google
Apple Vision Pro DURABILITY Test! Worth $3500?

A durability test performed on Apple’s new Vision Pro headset revealed many things we weren’t expecting.

Recommended Videos

In an admittedly unscientific test, tech YouTuber AppleTrack strapped the new Vision Pro mixed-reality device to his head and spent some time walking into walls and doors to see how the glass front on Apple’s newest device held up. He also dropped the headset from a great height to see if it stayed intact or shattered into a thousand tiny pieces. It did neither, but more on that later.

At the start of his video, AppleTrack’s Sam Kohl offers some very important advice for anyone forking out a hefty $3,499 for Apple’s new Vision Pro headset. And that is: Avoid picking up the headset by the light seal. It turns out that the magnetic connection between the seal and the main device is not that strong, and it easily comes away if you pick up the headset only by the seal. Such a mishap could see your pricey headset crash to the floor, risking damage to your brand-new Vision Pro.

For the durability test, Kohl plonks the Vision Pro on his head and spends around 40 minutes walking into things. Of course, few people are this clumsy, so it’s an unreal exercise — Kohl simply wanted to knock it against various surfaces with the weight of his head behind it to see how the glass and the rest of the device held up. Despite all the knocks and bumps, the glass remained in excellent condition, with only a few minor scuffs appearing.

During the test, it becomes apparent that in pass-through mode, where the real world is visible through the headset, the Vision Pro doesn’t offer a “move back” warning notification if you come too close to an object. Such notifications only appear when you’re in the immersive mode in a virtual environment, though even then, Kohl found that such alerts can be slow to show up.

Keen to bash it a bit harder but reluctant to suffer a concussion for the sake of his craft, Kohl takes off the headset and smacks it against the wall with greater force than before. More scratches appear, but overall, the glass continues to remain intact.

A drop test from head height again does little to trouble the glass, but Kohl then tries out the device for the first time since the start of the test and discovers that the left speaker no longer works. He also spots a small crack in the band around the right hinge about an inch back from the glass. “I was not expecting that to be the part of Vision Pro that goes first,” Kohl comments. The same crack appears on the other side a short while later.

Finally, the YouTuber drops the Vision Pro from way above his head, a distance that causes the glass to shatter finally, though it still holds together. As he peels off the broken glass, Kohl is delighted to discover that the device continues to work as normal. His camera operator even suggests that the EyeSight digital representation of the wearer’s eyes — a feature that has come in for criticism for its questionable quality — on the now glass-free Vision Pro screen “may even look a little bit better.”

No, we’re not suggesting you go and whip the glass off your Vision Pro for a better EyeSight experience, but it’s perhaps reassuring to know that if you do end up with a cracked screen and you don’t have AppleCare Plus to cover the damage, then you don’t necessarily have to drop $799 on new glass.

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
DigUp lets users find Mac files by describing them, not remembering their names
Can't remember where that screenshot, PDF or recording went? Just describe it and let AI do the digging.
DigUp App in Use screenshot

There's a particular kind of frustration that comes with knowing a file exists somewhere on a computer but having absolutely no idea what it's called. Was that screenshot saved as IMG_4837? Which PDF contained that clause? And where did that podcast recording mention the thing worth remembering? DigUp wants to end the filename guessing game, letting Mac users search for files by describing what they remember instead. The free, open-source app uses Google's EmbeddingGemma 2 to search across photos, documents, PDFs, audio recordings and videos, all without sending personal files to the cloud.

DigUp turns everyday descriptions into file searches

Read more
A new AI detector looks beyond words to check whether the ideas came from AI
This could help journals distinguish AI-written research from human work polished with AI.
ai-writing-book

Most AI detectors look for telltale signs of AI-generated text by examining word and sentence patterns. A new tool called IdeaLens takes a different route to solving this problem. It spots AI-generated research by looking at the ideas behind it instead of the wording itself (via TechXplore).

Researchers from the University of Maryland, Google DeepMind, and Simon Fraser University built IdeaLens to check whether a document's core arguments came from a human or a machine, regardless of who wrote the final draft.

Read more
Anthropic warns of imminent self-replicating AI that might even work off an oven or TV
Self-replicating AI could be merely months away, and tests show it can run on the devices sitting at your home.
Illustration of dangerous AI.

Over the past few weeks, nearly every AI lab has released frontier AI models. Earlier today, Google started rolling out Gemini 4, Argon, hot on the heels of Meta announcing its Muse Wonder frontier AI models to compete against the best from OpenAI and Anthropic's Claude. This relentless pace of AI model release comes at a time when the same AI labs are calling for development slowdown and increased regulation, following a series of concerning incidents where these AI models went rogue and broke into private, as well as government-owned, websites.

Now, Anthropic has dropped a chilling set of predictions about the capabilities of these AI models after running a series of tests. The company claims that small AI models could be merely a few months away from self-replicating and turning into a dangerous swarm. More importantly, they won't require a massive data center or an uber-powerful computer to do so. On the contrary, the lab claims that these self-replicating AI swarms will need something with as little computing power as an average Internet-connected device, like a smart oven or an Android TV box.

Read more