Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. Legacy Archives

BioMetrics BioVault 2.0

Add as a preferred source on Google


When it comes to keeping things locked up, combination or key safes just seem terribly outdated. Not in a quaint, nostalgic way – like pocket watches or trains – we’re talking about the same technology you used to use to lock up your books in high school, and probably a sweat-stained bag of t-shirts and shorts at the gym. It works, but there’s nothing particularly impressive about it, and chances are you’re going to be fumbling with the lock a few times before you really get the hang of it (although it shouldn’t be making you late to fifth period biology, anymore.)

Sequiam Biometrics’ BioVault 2.0 safe, on the other hand, looks like it was pried off the wall of a futuristic Doom 3 space station. The slim black vault with dual front doors and a curvaceous design screams different, and means it too: It’s one of the few next-generation safes that use biometric fingerprint-recognition technology to provide access.

Recommended Videos

At first glance, this can easily be dismissed as a gimmick. After all, combination and key locks do provide an adequate level of security, and a safe isn’t exactly a flashy item you’ll be showing it off to visitors in your home. But for those who intend to store firearms, a fingerprint lock has the key advantage of being quick: Just swipe your finger down the front reader and a second later the spring-loaded doors pop open. In the home-intrusion scenarios that many gun owners intend to prepare for, this can conceivably make the difference between a burglar walking in on an armed homeowner or one fumbling with a lock. Biometrics claims gun owners should be able to fit up to four firearms in the unit, depending on size, as well as ammunition. And, an added advantage, there’s no key for kids to find or combination for them to figure out – only a legitimate finger swipe from the owner will do.

BioMetrics BioVault 2.0
Image courtesy of BioMetrics

Since the unit is electronically controlled, it will, unlike a conventional safe, need electricity to operate. Three D cells should power the safe for an entire year, or an included AC adapter can run it off of wall current. Fortunately, the BioVault uses non-volatile flash memory to store fingerprints, meaning that dead batteries or a power failure won’t cause the safe to fail, and it will still work when you fire it back up.

An LCD display on the front of the unit is intended to make the setup process easier, by guiding first-time users through the process with instructions. Enrolling fingerprints in the system involves swiping a finger three times to give the unit an accurate impression. As an extra techie touch, the screen will even display each fingerprint on the LCD as they enter the system to let you know what your own unique biometric identifier looks like. Up to 50 fingerprints can be enrolled, which should be more than enough unless you’re living in a particularly large fraternity or cult compound.

And in case you were wondering: No, the BioVault cannot be opened with a sawn-off finger. It’s actually sensitive enough to determine whether your digits are alive or not, and it won’t work if it detects that they aren’t. So would-be thieves: Don’t get any ideas.

As you might expect, you’ll pay a slight premium for the fun of pretending your house is a high-security FBI lab. The BioVault 2.0 retails for $399 USD, but can be found for much lower from online retailers with a little Googling. That’s more than conventional units of the same size go for, but right on par with the few other fingerprint safes out there. But if keeping your valuables a literal finger touch away appeals to you, the extra money may just be well spent. Find out more on their website.

Nick Mokey
As Digital Trends’ Editor in Chief, Nick Mokey oversees an editorial team covering every gadget under the sun, along with…
Anthropic’s sensitive internal data was exposed, and AI helped make it happen
Even the company behind Claude isn't immune to AI-powered security threats, as researchers discovered some worrying vulnerabilities.
Claude Anthropic Featured

AI companies spend enormous amounts of time convincing us their technology is safe and secure. But what happens when those same companies become targets of increasingly sophisticated AI-powered attacks? Anthropic, the company behind Claude, is now facing that question. According to a Washington Post report, cybersecurity startup Cathedral discovered vulnerabilities that let its researchers access sensitive information in Anthropic's internal systems.

The researchers used AI agents to identify potential entry points in less than 12 hours. Interestingly, they didn't need to crack Claude itself. Instead, they exploited weaknesses in third-party business applications that Anthropic uses for everyday operations. Anthropic's security testing program disclosed the findings, which allows outside researchers to identify and report vulnerabilities.

Read more
A new startup wants to fix the military’s working-dog shortage with cloning and gene editing
Promising pitch, plenty of unanswered questions about the dogs.
a new startup wants to fix the militarys working dog shortage with cloning and gene editing warhound featured image

Military working dogs charge into places the rest of us would flee. So, I understand why anyone would want to breed tougher, healthier dogs for the job.

Warhound, a new startup from Colossal Biosciences co-founder Ben Lamm and Anduril co-founder Palmer Luckey, has stepped out of stealth with $200 million to clone and gene-edit working dogs for American troops, police departments, and emergency services (via TechCrunch).

Read more
AI can describe a picture, but it still struggles to understand blind users
A University of Maryland study finds that Be My AI often buries useful answers in lengthy descriptions, leaving blind users to work harder to get the information they need.
Blind Man using walking stick

AI can describe a picture, identify objects, and answer questions about what a camera sees. But when a blind user needs a quick answer, getting an entire spoken essay about the scene isn't exactly helpful. Researchers at the University of Maryland (UMD) have found that AI-powered visual assistance can leave blind users doing too much work to get the information they actually need.

The study, titled Say It My Way: Exploring Control in Conversational Visual Question Answering with Blind Users, examined how people interact with Be My AI, an AI-powered feature of the Be My Eyes app. The researchers found that users often received lengthy descriptions that didn't adequately address their immediate goals, forcing them to ask follow-up questions or find ways to steer the AI towards a more useful answer.

Read more