Skip to main content

Cockpit calamity: Pilot error sparks hijack security alert on passenger plane

Cockpits in large airplanes feature a dizzying array of buttons, levers, dials, and displays that would leave the head of most folks spinning if they were asked to identify each and every one of them (or indeed, just one of them).

But as an incident at a Dutch airport showed this week, even the most skilled pilots can get it wrong occasionally.

According to media reports, part of Amsterdam’s Schiphol Airport was put on lockdown Wednesday evening over a suspected hijacking after an Air Europa pilot raised the alarm from the aircraft shortly before take-off.

As the Madrid-bound plane was evacuated, military police at the airport tweeted that it was responding to what it called a “suspicious situation.” During the emergency, a number of other planes were stopped from taking off, while photos posted on social media showed passengers in the terminal building waiting for updates regarding their delayed flights.

But an hour later, it emerged that the alert had somehow been made in error.

“False alarm,” Air Europa tweeted, explaining that a warning “that triggers protocols on hijackings at airports” had been activated by mistake. The message continued: “Nothing has happened, all passengers are safe and sound waiting to fly soon. We deeply apologize.”

Airport officials had originally described the incident as a “GRIP-3” situation, an event with potentially major consequences for those in the vicinity. But thankfully, in this case, it turned out to be no such thing, and everyone on the plane and at the airport was safe.

It’s not clear precisely how the hijack alert came to be triggered, but the BBC noted that Federal Aviation Administration documents show that “pilots can use a special transponder beacon code, typing 7500, to raise an alert for unlawful interference in the case of a hijacking.” Whether this happened at Schiphol isn’t immediately clear.

The idea that the chaos may have been caused by nothing more than a typo reminds us of another incident a few years back when a catalog of errors, which included a pilot inputting a typo in the plane’s systems prior to take-off, led the aircraft’s software to understand that it was in a different country, causing all kinds of problems for the pilots after the plane took off.

Editors' Recommendations

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
Commercial jet almost collides with drone near LAX sparking police search for UAV’s pilot
airline drone collision lax lufthansa

A Lufthansa airlines commercial jet has had a near-miss encounter with a drone during its approach to Los Angeles International Airport. Now, the LA police and sheriff’s office are on the hunt for the owner of the UAV.

The aircraft’s pilot reported the incident, which involved a drone flying 200 feet over the Lufthansa Airbus A380, before 2:00 pm PT on Friday afternoon, reports the Los Angeles Times.

Read more
Never get stranded on the tarmac again: new MIT system cuts down airplane queue time

Nobody likes waiting at airports. But one of the only things worse than waiting beside the gate is waiting on the airplane itself, stranded on the runway, and an MIT engineering team has set out to solve that problem. Using a new queuing model, the MIT system can predict how long a plane will have to wait before takeoff so that air traffic controllers can better manage planes on the tarmac, cut down waiting times, and keep runways running efficiently.

The algorithmic model takes into account many factors that influence airport runway congestion, from weather conditions and existing runway traffic to inbound and outbound flight times, local and international delays, and more. The first step of the model takes into account an airplane’s route and estimated time from the gate to takeoff. On top of all these factors and the estimated timing of an individual plane’s departure, the model takes into account the average time it takes a plane to take off once it has joined the runway queue.

Read more
Sleeping In Airports ranks the best and worst airports in the world
best airports for layovers z  rich airport airside center bar 1

When it's raining outside, does it rain inside too at your local airport? If you live in anywhere Port Harcourt International Airport in Nigeria, your answer may be yes, and similarly, if you live in New York City, you may have similar gripes with the dreaded LaGuardia Airport. Thanks to travel website Sleeping In Airports, travelers now have the inside scoop as to which airports to frequent and which to avoid at all costs when jetsetting around the country or around the world. And with "virtually no seating, broken air-conditioning, and a tent for an Arrivals Hall," Nigeria's Port Harcourt International Airport took top honors as the worst airport in the world.

Of course, many of the most problematic international airports are largely a side effect of unstable political and economic conditions in their home countries (think Nepal, Uzbekistan, Venezuela, Afghanistan, and Pakistan). So while multi-hour queues and lack of air conditioning, seating, or dining options are certainly frustrating, they're not altogether unsurprising. But what about North America's list? What excuses do we have for our less than ideal airport conditions?

Read more