Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. News

Pro cyclo-cross rides into ‘technological doping’ scandal

Add as a preferred source on Google

With performance-enhancing drugs supposedly now out of the pro-cycling picture, could it be that one or two shady competitors are now turning to technology to help get their wheels spinning faster?

The discovery of a motor inside the frame of a bicycle during the world cyclo-cross championships in Belgium over the weekend clearly points to at least one incident of foul play, and will do little to instill confidence in the already tarnished sport.

Recommended Videos

Union Cycliste International (UCI), cycling’s governing body, has confirmed it’s investigating the incident, which involves Belgian under-23 rider and current European Champion Femke Van den Driessche.

Accusations of what the UCI is calling “technological doping” have been made before in professional cycling, though nothing’s ever been proved. This time, however, officials have confirmed the discovery of a mechanical aid fitted inside a competitor’s bike.

UCI coordinator Peter Van den Abeele told Belgian sports broadcaster Sporza that a bike belonging to Van den Driessche was examined in the pits during a race “and found to be in violation of the rules.”

According to reporter Martin Vangramberen (via Cycling Tips), officials became concerned when a scan of the bike flagged up something suspicious inside the frame.

“When the saddle of the tube was removed, there were electrical cables protruding from the tube,” Vangramberen said. “When they wanted to remove the crankshaft, something that is normally easy, it was not possible because the crankshaft was stuck. The motor was in there.”

Details of the discovered motorized device haven’t been released.

Van den Driessche insists there’s been a big mistake, telling Sporza (via Cycling News) there’d been “nothing in the bike that I used at the start of the race,” adding, “I train hard….it’s no fun to be accused like this. I hope they see the truth.”

Another report has the 19-year-old cyclist claiming there’d been some kind of mix-up, with the bike at the center of the incident apparently owned by another person she’d been training with.

Depending on the outcome of the UCI’s investigation, the rider could face a competition ban of six-months and a fine of at least 20,000 Swiss francs (about $20,000), although the penalties could turn out to be much more serious.

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
Yet another study says AI is bad for elections, and the rabbit hole gets worse
AI may be an election bomb waiting for someone to light the fuse
Voters cast their ballots on Election Day

Another election, another study has concluded that asking an AI chatbot for political guidance is a spectacularly bad idea. Research conducted during Hungary’s 2026 parliamentary election found that ChatGPT and Google Gemini offered not just inaccurate but also inconsistent and unreliable voting advice. The chatbots misclassified voter profiles, overlooked relevant parties, recommended parties absent from the ballot, and sometimes produced materially different answers when given the same information repeatedly.

AI keeps failing the voter test

Read more
Samsung’s humanoid robot ambitions are real, but factories come first
Samsung’s new robotics division has humanoids in its sights, although its immediate business is far more practical factory automation
Robot Touch Human Finger

Samsung wants a place in the humanoid race, but its new robotics push begins with machines built for factories rather than homes.

The CEO-led RX robotics division will initially focus on manufacturing robots. Samsung has separately identified humanoids as a priority, although it hasn’t announced a commercial model or explained where one fits into the division’s immediate plans.

Read more
The future of AI may depend on this one behind-the-scenes change
Running Claude on Android.

Whenever a new AI model arrives, it's easy to get caught up in the bells and whistles. We talk about how much smarter it is, how quickly it answers questions, or how realistic its images have become. But here's the thing: none of that matters much if the AI can't reliably work with the apps and services people use every day.

That's why an upcoming update to the Model Context Protocol (MCP) caught my attention. It isn't a new chatbot or a fancy AI model. In fact, most people will never even know it's happening. But it could quietly make the AI ecosystem a lot healthier. If you've never heard of MCP before, don't worry. Think of it as a shared language that lets AI assistants safely talk to apps like Gmail, Slack, calendars, databases, and countless other services. Instead of every company inventing its own way to make those connections, MCP gives everyone a common rulebook.

Read more