Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. Legacy Archives

FCC Probing Comcast over VoIP Service

Add as a preferred source on Google
FCC Probing Comcast over VoIP Service
Image used with permission by copyright holder

The Federal Communications Commission is looking into whether Comcast, the nation’s largest cable television operator, is discriminating against VoIP operators whose call traffic transits Comcast’s network. In a letter to Comcast (PDF), the agency has asked the company to clarify discrepancies between Comcast’s filings with the FCC describing its broadband management practices and the Comcast’s actual advertised service.

Comcast describes its own VoIP product offering as riding on a separate facilities-based IP phone service that isn’t subject to Comcast’s network management policies. However, Comcast’s online support documents and FAQs indicate third-party VoIP services are subject to the same network management policies as any other Internet traffic and, therefore, may sound “choppy.”

Recommended Videos

“We request that Comcast explain why it omitted from its filings with the Commission the distinct effects that Comcast’s new network management technique has on Comcast’s VoIP offering versus those of its competitors,” wrote Kathryn Zachem, vice president of regulatory affairs for the FCC, and Matthew Berry, FCC general counsel. “We also ask that you provide a detailed justification for Comcast’s disparate treatment of its own VoIP service as compared to that offered by other VoIP providers on its network.”

Comcast offers digital VoIP voice services as a service alongside broadband Internet and cable television in a “triple-play” of consumer services, often offering steep initial discounts in order to convince customers to switch from competing Internet, television, and phone providers.

The FCC also wants to know how Comcast’s VoIP offering is “facilities-based,” since that would seem to make it subject to regulation and intercarrier compensation fees.

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
DeepSeek just slashed AI prices again, and China’s AI race is getting even messier
DeepSeek AI chatbot running on an iPhone.

China's AI race has never really been short on competition, but it's increasingly looking like a battle over who can charge the least rather than who can build the best model.

DeepSeek has unveiled its latest open-weight AI model, called V4-Flash, alongside a dramatic price reduction that makes it significantly cheaper for developers to use. The company has cut token pricing by 50% and has also decided against introducing a previously announced dynamic pricing system that would have increased costs during periods of heavy demand. The new changes paint a clear picture: DeepSeek appears more interested in winning over developers and expanding its user base than maximizing revenue in the short term.

Read more
AI slop stories are spoiling the childhood
Grandparents are gifting AI-generated story books to kids, and it's just gross.
A child reading a book.

AI slop, the colloquial term for low-effort AI-generated content, has emerged as a huge problem across different industries. Music labels are fighting streaming services to put an AI label on such tra/cks. Publishing houses are wary of AI-written drafts. Research journals are buried under a deluge of AI-generated papers. The software industry is reeling under the pressure of vibe-coded apps brimming with security flaws. Even Apple is struggling against a tide of bug reports created using AI. Of course, the disdain against AI is pretty obvious, but there's now a new dimension to it.

Boomers are gifting AI-generated books to their grandkids.

Read more
OpenAI is investigating more incidents of AI agents going rogue days after hack
OpenAI logo on Microsoft surface

It appears that the "AI agents going rogue" tale has more to it than what AI giants have revealed publicly so far. Merely days after OpenAI announced that its AI agents went rogue and hacked Hugging Face, Anthropic dropped a similar bombshell. Soon, it was discovered that not just one, but multiple services were compromised. Well, it seems there are even more layers to it.

Reuters reports that OpenAI has found more incidents of AI agents escaping their software containment environment during research. Citing sources with knowledge of the incident, the outlet notes that the AI agents didn't go beyond OpenAI's software environment and affect any external service.

Read more