Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. News

How genetically engineered moths could save billions in crop damage losses

Add as a preferred source on Google
The Diamondback Moth: Pest Control Without Pesticide

Scientists have created genetically engineered moths and released them into the wild. Before you start fretting about the insect version of Jurassic Park, however, it’s for our own good. At least, when it comes to feeding the planet.

Recommended Videos

No, the moths aren’t designed to be some lab-grown future foodstuff. Instead, researchers from Cornell University have worked with scientists from biotech company Oxitec to find environmentally friendly ways to limit the damage caused to crops by the diamondback moth, which can add up to billions of dollars in losses. Their answer? Genetically engineer your way out of the problem.

“We are interested in using genetic engineering of an insect species to help manage pest populations without the use of additional insecticides,” Anthony Shelton, professor of entomology at Cornell, told Digital Trends. “The ‘self-limiting’ technology we used is a vast improvement over the sterile insect technique, developed in the 1950s and promoted by Rachel Carson in her seminal book, Silent Spring.”

Moth closeup of face 1
David Castro / EyeEm / Getty Images

That approach of insect control involves releasing large numbers of sterile insects into the wild. The sterile male insects then compete with wild males to mate with females, which subsequently produce no offspring. The result is a reduction in the next generation’s population. This work takes the same broad approach, but with genetic engineering in place of sterilization using X-rays.

“Two genes – a self-limiting gene and a marker gene – were introduced into the insect, such that it can pass them onto offspring just like any other gene,” said Dr. Neil Morrison, agricultural lead for Oxitec. “After the release of these male moths, the self-limiting gene prevents their female offspring from surviving. So with sustained releases of self-limiting males, the number of pest females declines, leading to pest suppression. [The] marker gene – for a protein that is visible under suitable light – [meanwhile] allows us to monitor the moths in the field. The self-limiting moths are non-toxic and non-allergenic.”

In their research so far, the team has demonstrated that introducing these “self-limiting” male insects into the pest population causes it to collapse. They have also shown that these males have similar dispersal and longevity in the field as compared with a non-engineered strain.

“Combining these two studies suggests that ‘self-limiting’ male insects can be released in a field to manage the pest population without the use of insecticides,” Shelton continued. “Additional field studies are needed to verify this result under different agronomic conditions.”

A paper describing the work was recently published in the journal Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology.

Luke Dormehl
I'm a UK-based tech writer covering Cool Tech at Digital Trends. I've also written for Fast Company, Wired, the Guardian…
Yet another study says AI is bad for elections, and the rabbit hole gets worse
AI may be an election bomb waiting for someone to light the fuse
Voters cast their ballots on Election Day

Another election, another study has concluded that asking an AI chatbot for political guidance is a spectacularly bad idea. Research conducted during Hungary’s 2026 parliamentary election found that ChatGPT and Google Gemini offered not just inaccurate but also inconsistent and unreliable voting advice. The chatbots misclassified voter profiles, overlooked relevant parties, recommended parties absent from the ballot, and sometimes produced materially different answers when given the same information repeatedly.

AI keeps failing the voter test

Read more
Samsung’s humanoid robot ambitions are real, but factories come first
Samsung’s new robotics division has humanoids in its sights, although its immediate business is far more practical factory automation
Robot Touch Human Finger

Samsung wants a place in the humanoid race, but its new robotics push begins with machines built for factories rather than homes.

The CEO-led RX robotics division will initially focus on manufacturing robots. Samsung has separately identified humanoids as a priority, although it hasn’t announced a commercial model or explained where one fits into the division’s immediate plans.

Read more
The future of AI may depend on this one behind-the-scenes change
Running Claude on Android.

Whenever a new AI model arrives, it's easy to get caught up in the bells and whistles. We talk about how much smarter it is, how quickly it answers questions, or how realistic its images have become. But here's the thing: none of that matters much if the AI can't reliably work with the apps and services people use every day.

That's why an upcoming update to the Model Context Protocol (MCP) caught my attention. It isn't a new chatbot or a fancy AI model. In fact, most people will never even know it's happening. But it could quietly make the AI ecosystem a lot healthier. If you've never heard of MCP before, don't worry. Think of it as a shared language that lets AI assistants safely talk to apps like Gmail, Slack, calendars, databases, and countless other services. Instead of every company inventing its own way to make those connections, MCP gives everyone a common rulebook.

Read more