Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. Mobile
  4. Legacy Archives

LightSquared points finger at GPS makers for interference problems

Add as a preferred source on Google
LightSquared SkyTerra 1
Image used with permission by copyright holder

In a move that’s sure to win friends and admirers in the GPS industry, LTE network developer LightSquared today said that the reason its pending mobile broadband network might interfere with GPS systems is because GPS manufacturers never met Department of Defense and international standards. In a filing with the Federal Communications Commission, LightSquared laid the blame for its systems potentially interfering with GPS receivers at the feet of the GPS industry, asserting they failed to comply with required standards and “spurned” international recommendations for how GPS receivers should be designed.

“Had the GPS industry complied with DoD’s recommended filtering standards for GPS receivers, there would be no issue with LightSquared’s operations in the lower portion of its downlink band,” LightSquared’s executive VP for regulatory affairs and public police wrote in the FCC filing.

Recommended Videos

The issue is no small matter for LightSquared, which is seeking to build out a nationwide 4G LTE network using a number of satellite-linked terrestrial base stations. LightSquared’s LTE transmissions will operate in bands near frequencies close to frequencies reserved for the notoriously low-powered GPS signals sent from GPS satellites. The fear is that interference from LightSquared’s operations will interfere with passive GPS reception, potentially disrupting everything from vehicle navigation to emergency response systems.

According to LightSquared, the Department of Defense initially set aside 4MHz of frequency as a “guard band” that no one was supposed to use, effectively acting as a separator between spectrum used for GPS signals and spectrum that would (eventually) be used for other purposes. However, LightSquared says that the GPS industry is insisting on a 34MHz guard band—some eight and a half times wider—to ensure that LightSquared’s systems don’t interfere with GPS receivers.

LightSquared’s basic argument is that if GPS manufacturers had only designed their gear with that 4MHz guard band in mind—instead of accepting signals from well outside it—there wouldn’t be any issue with GPS interference. LightSquared characterizes the GPS industry’s insistence on a 34 MHz guard band as “squatting,” for free, on frequencies to which they have no license, and which can only be licensed for use in the U.S. by the government.

“Given the DoD’s clear recommendations and the long-standing ITU warnings, it is not credible for the GPS industry to now claim that it is not responsible for the flawed design of its receivers,” the company wrote in its statement. “The GPS industry has a responsibility to use its licensed spectrum in accordance with international and federal government standards—not for LightSquared’s sake, but for the sake of the American people who own the public airwaves and who fund the GPS satellite system.”

Strong words—we can’t imagine the GPS industry is going to take them lightly.

LightSquared recently announced a spectrum deal with Immarsat that would enable it to initially shift its LTE services to a frequency block further away from frequencies used by GPS systems.

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
Google just canceled its AI Studio mobile app, and it’s not all bad news
Logo, Symbol, Disk

Google AI Studio was on track to make its way to Android and iPhone, giving developers and AI enthusiasts a dedicated place to build prompts and experiment with Google's latest models from their phones.

That's no longer happening. In a post shared by the official Google AI Studio account on X, Google confirmed that it's canceling the standalone AI Studio mobile app before launch. The announcement comes despite the company saying nearly 800,000 people had already pre-ordered the app across iOS and Android.

Read more
Google Earth’s AI misadventure lasted only a day. It was a tale of dangerous ignorance.
Nuclear reactors, tanks, and historical destruction on a life-like satellite map? Yeah, that's bad.
Nano Banana AI image generator representation.

Technology behemoths are clearly not reading the room, or they are just moving faster than they should when it comes to AI deployment. Google has already stuffed its Gemini AI in every corner of its software stack, from Android to daily productivity tools like Gmail that are used by hundreds of millions of users every day. AI is everywhere. Not all of it is bad, mind you. But in a few places, it just feels forced.

In its latest AI-fication experiment, the company targeted Google Earth. The idea was to let the audience use its Nano Banana 2 AI image generator and make images that can be placed on the map view. On paper, it's a cool idea. What would the Colosseum of Rome look like in your urban neighborhood? Yeah, fun stuff like that.

Read more
Google’s new AI gives robots better balance, smarter hands, and teamwork capabilities
Google just made robots a lot less clumsy and a lot more helpful.
Gemini robotics 2.0

Google DeepMind just brought sci-fi robots closer to reality, and it is very exciting. Building on its original Gemini Robotics model, the company has introduced Gemini Robotics 2, an AI system designed to help robots think, move, and even work together. Unlike most robots today, which rely on pre-programmed routines or someone controlling them remotely, this new system lets robots figure things out on their own when situations get unpredictable.

Can robots finally handle whole-body tasks?

Read more