Samsung Planning to Compete with iTunes

By Geoff Duncan Published October 31, 2005

South Korea’s Samsung Electronics is working on its own digital music download service as a way to increase the company’s share of the portable digital music player market

The news came from the head of the company’s digital media division, Choi Ji-Sung, on October 28 to the South Korean paper Choson Ilbo, and was confirmed by Samsung spokesperson Kwon Hyosun today. Samsung has not announced any launch date for its service.

Recommended Videos

Samsung wouldn’t be the first electronics maker to launch a music store to promote its own products: Samsung would face immediate competition from both Apple’s iTunes Music Store and Sony’s Connect. South Korea’s Funcake music store is run by Reigncom, also which produced iRiver players, and the Asia-Pacific SoundBuzz service is backed by both Reigncom and Creative Technology.

Samsung claims that its portable music players are outselling Apple’s iPod in markets where Apple’s iTunes Music Store isn’t available; the company believes, therefore, that the key to competing with the iPod where Apple’s online store is available is to emulate Apple’s integrated solution and offer an online download service for its players. Currently, anyone considering buying a Samsung player faces the challenge of locating, selecting, and signing up for a digital music download service in addition to purchasing and learning to use the Samsung device. Samsung aims to lower that barrier by providing its own, easy-to-use download service right out of the box.

Currently, Samsung devices are compatible with a wide variety of online music services, including MSN Music, Yahoo Music, and Napster, although they cannot be used with the iTunes Music Store.

Former Contributor

Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…

Topics

Emerging Tech

Emerging Tech

AI chatbots will happily create fake news articles, and tests show ChatGPT is the worst at it

Electronics, Phone, Mobile Phone

The biggest AI chatbots are supposed to help people find information, not manufacture misinformation. But a new investigation suggests that separating those two jobs isn't as straightforward as many AI companies would like users to believe. A series of tests found that several leading AI chatbots, including ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Microsoft Copilot, and Meta AI, could be persuaded to generate fake news stories, fabricated headlines, and even realistic-looking screenshots of well-known media outlets. While every chatbot showed some weaknesses, ChatGPT reportedly performed the worst, producing the most convincing fake content with surprisingly little effort.

The findings come from an investigation by German newsroom CORRECTIV, which tested how the AI assistants responded when asked to create false reports involving sensitive topics such as election fraud, government coups, war, vaccines, climate change, and conspiracy theories.

Emerging Tech

DeepSeek just slashed AI prices again, and China’s AI race is getting even messier

DeepSeek AI chatbot running on an iPhone.

China's AI race has never really been short on competition, but it's increasingly looking like a battle over who can charge the least rather than who can build the best model.

DeepSeek has unveiled its latest open-weight AI model, called V4-Flash, alongside a dramatic price reduction that makes it significantly cheaper for developers to use. The company has cut token pricing by 50% and has also decided against introducing a previously announced dynamic pricing system that would have increased costs during periods of heavy demand. The new changes paint a clear picture: DeepSeek appears more interested in winning over developers and expanding its user base than maximizing revenue in the short term.

Computing

AI slop stories are spoiling the childhood

Grandparents are gifting AI-generated story books to kids, and it's just gross.

A child reading a book.

AI slop, the colloquial term for low-effort AI-generated content, has emerged as a huge problem across different industries. Music labels are fighting streaming services to put an AI label on such tra/cks. Publishing houses are wary of AI-written drafts. Research journals are buried under a deluge of AI-generated papers. The software industry is reeling under the pressure of vibe-coded apps brimming with security flaws. Even Apple is struggling against a tide of bug reports created using AI. Of course, the disdain against AI is pretty obvious, but there's now a new dimension to it.

Boomers are gifting AI-generated books to their grandkids.