Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. Features

AI chatbots will happily create fake news articles, and tests show ChatGPT is the worst at it

Add as a preferred source on Google
ChatGPT logo on iPhone
Shimul Sood / Digital Trends

The biggest AI chatbots are supposed to help people find information, not manufacture misinformation. But a new investigation suggests that separating those two jobs isn’t as straightforward as many AI companies would like users to believe. A series of tests found that several leading AI chatbots, including ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Microsoft Copilot, and Meta AI, could be persuaded to generate fake news stories, fabricated headlines, and even realistic-looking screenshots of well-known media outlets. While every chatbot showed some weaknesses, ChatGPT reportedly performed the worst, producing the most convincing fake content with surprisingly little effort.

The findings come from an investigation by German newsroom CORRECTIV, which tested how the AI assistants responded when asked to create false reports involving sensitive topics such as election fraud, government coups, war, vaccines, climate change, and conspiracy theories.

The fake news problem isn’t going away

According to the investigation, ChatGPT generated the majority of the requested fake content, sometimes after only minor prompt adjustments. In several cases, it reportedly produced highly realistic mock-ups of articles that closely resembled established news organizations. One example included a fabricated screenshot designed to look like a legitimate news article displayed inside a web browser on a desktop computer. In another instance, ChatGPT reportedly refused to create misleading news content in text while still generating the accompanying fake image anyway — a contradiction that raises fresh questions about how consistently its safeguards are enforced.

The report also found an interesting inconsistency. ChatGPT allowed fake versions of several German news outlets to be recreated, while similar requests involving publications such as The New York Times and the BBC were blocked. OpenAI did not explain why those differences exist. Instead, the company said it continuously improves its safety systems and noted that using ChatGPT to deceive people violates its policies.

No chatbot came away with a perfect score

ChatGPT wasn’t the only AI assistant that struggled. Google’s Gemini also created fabricated articles and fake screenshots involving multiple news organizations, although the final results weren’t considered as convincing. Google pointed to its policies against harmful misinformation, while acknowledging that generative AI systems still operate within the limits of their training. Microsoft Copilot also generated fake news-style content during testing, though it generally included an “AI-Generated” label and produced designs that were easier to distinguish from genuine articles.

Meta AI proved the most resistant overall. The chatbot created only one fake media post during testing and refused to generate several prompts that included specific false claims, citing company policies around copyright and misuse. The findings arrive as concerns about AI-generated misinformation continue to grow. A recent fake news post circulating on social media, designed to resemble reporting from a major German broadcaster, was created using ChatGPT and briefly fooled users online. Legal experts cited in the investigation warned that producing highly convincing fake news with AI could have serious consequences. Depending on how the content is used, creators could potentially face claims ranging from defamation and reputational damage to violations involving forged digital documents. As AI tools become faster, cheaper, and more accessible, the challenge is making sure they don’t become some of the internet’s most effective misinformation machines.

Shimul Sood
Shimul is a contributor at Digital Trends, with over five years of experience in the tech space.
Pangram, the gold standard for AI text checks, releases Image 1.0 tool to sniff fake pics and videos
It can identify AI-generated pictures with an astounding 99.96% accuracy on its own evaluation set.
AI image detector tool pangram

Pangram, one of the most widely used and trusted AI text detectors out there, is finally releasing its multimedia detection tools to the masses. Pangram Image 1.0, which was previously available as a research preview, is now widely available on the web, through the company’s API, and via its eponymous Chrome extension.

The company claims its image detector can identify AI-generated pictures with an astounding 99.96% accuracy on its own evaluation set. Pangram also notes that it has improved the model’s accuracy over the past few months, especially against edited images, low-resolution pictures, and pictures made by the most advanced AI models out there. As far as the competition goes, TruthScan achieves an accuracy of 96.33%, followed by AI or Not at 91.38% and Sightengine at 88.33%.

Read more
Scammers are using AI to fake missing pet photos, and what happens next is horrifying
Criminals are using AI-generated pet photos to convince desperate owners their missing animals have been found, before demanding money and making disturbing threats.
Brown and white cat meowing in Inzoi.

Losing a pet can be heartbreaking, and anyone who's experienced it knows how quickly you'd drop everything if someone called to say they'd found your missing dog or cat. Unfortunately, scammers have learned to exploit that desperation, and AI is making their tricks even more convincing.

A disturbing new scam is targeting pet owners across the UK, with criminals using AI-generated images to pretend they've found missing animals. They then demand money for their return, sometimes going as far as threatening to kill the pets if the owners refuse to pay. According to a BBC report, several pet owners have already experienced these attacks, with scammers using convincing photographs, emotional stories, and increasingly aggressive messages to pressure them into paying.

Read more
AI can turn your Instagram posts into scam that know a little too much about you
Your public social media posts could be helping scammers create emails that feel personal, and existing AI safeguards aren't doing enough to stop them.
Electronics, Mobile Phone, Phone

We've all received those suspicious emails claiming we've won something, missed a delivery, or need to urgently update our bank details. Most are easy enough to ignore, especially when they're full of strange wording or have absolutely nothing to do with us. But what happens when a scam email actually knows what you've been up to lately? That's where things get a little worrying.

Researchers at the University of Texas at Arlington have found that AI can use information people share publicly on social media to create phishing emails that feel personal. And we're not just talking about knowing your name or where you work. These emails can reference things you've recently done, places you've visited, or even something you've been looking forward to. The researchers showed how widely available AI models could gather these details and turn them into targeted messages, potentially letting scammers reach large numbers of people without spending hours researching each person individually.

Read more