Skip to main content

Microsoft beat the FTC. Here’s what the controversial court ruling means for Xbox

Xbox's logo used during the Extended Games Showcase

You’ve probably heard that the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) lost its case against Microsoft after an exciting and revelatory trial. On Tuesday, Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley denied FTC’s motion for a preliminary injunction to block Microsoft’s acquisition of Activision Blizzard before its potential completion by July 18. Ultimately, Corley did not believe that Microsoft owning Call of Duty would “substantially lessen competition” in the game industry. It was major win for Microsoft after months of regulatory hoops and roadblocks, but the FTC quickly moved to appeal the decision. This all raises an important question: What’s next?

Over the next week, Microsoft, Activision Blizzard, and the FTC will determine the fate of the gaming companies involved in this acquisition and set a precedent for the future of the game industry. On top of that, Microsoft still has to deal with the next moves made by the U.K.’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), which wants to block the acquisition due to its impact on cloud gaming. Following the release of Judge Corley’s Preliminary Injunction Opinion, I spoke to two analysts and a lawyer with knowledge of the video game industry to better understand what lies ahead for Microsoft and Activision, the FTC, and the CMA. The battle isn’t quite over yet, even if the end is finally on the horizon.

What’s next for Microsoft and Activision Blizzard

Currently, Microsoft and Activision are in a solid position, as a Judge has ruled that Microsoft is unlikely to pull Call of Duty from PlayStation or lessen competition in the game console, cloud gaming, or game subscription markets by acquiring Activision Blizzard. There’s a temporary restraining order in place until July 14, which the FTC hopes to successfully appeal during. As soon as that order is up, though, Microsoft and Activision Blizzard have until July 18 to complete the acquisition.

Xbox acquired Activision Blizzard on January 18, 2022, and gained the rights to Call of Duty, Candy Crush, and more.

MIDiA Research Senior Games Analyst Karol Severin tells Digital Trends that this decision is “an important win that brings the acquisition significantly closer to completion” and that MIDiA sees no clear reason why U.S. courts would stop the deal before then. “It’s an expected continuation of a journey that is to reach its destination soon,” Severin continued. This was a sentiment shared by Sam Castree of Sam Castree Law. The lawyer tells Digital Trends that it’s “extremely likely that the merger goes through” and that he was “remarkably unimpressed with the FTC’s arguments.”

So yes, Severin and Castree believe Judge Corley’s decision makes the acquisition much more possible than it seemed before. And all indications from official comments by Microsoft President Brad Smith and Head of Xbox Phil Spencer made it clear that Microsoft and Activision will try to close their deal by July 18. Severin believes a successful acquisition will be positive for gamers and serve as a catalyst for discussion about the role of a traditional games publisher in the game industry and how much the game industry is consolidating.

“Microsoft’s next move will depend in part on what the FTC decides to do.”

Microsoft wants the deal to go through, and if it were solely up to it, the acquisition would happen by July 18. In reality, Castree believes that Microsoft’s next play will be in direct response to the FTC’s action, like the move to appeal the decision. “Maybe the FTC still takes the case to trial next month and probably loses,” he says. “But at this point, Microsoft is going to just proceed forward with finishing the deal like they had always planned to.”

What’s next for the FTC

The FTC came out as a clear loser from these hearings. Judge Corley denied their attempt at a preliminary injunction and pointed out flaws in the evidence the FTC tried to use to stop the deal. In its final findings of fact documents, the FTC greatly disagrees and are adamant about using appellate courts to prevent this acquisition from going through before July 18. Castree thinks that it’d be best for the FTC to drop the case at this point because of how bad it looks for them and how its attention should be elsewhere. Still, Castree explained why this appeal was something the FTC pursued.

“I think that the FTC’s most viable option — not great, but better than its other options –would be to appeal the denial of the injunction,” Castree tells Digital Trends. “Judge Corley was clear, ‘The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals [i.e., the appellate court that oversees her district] has not addressed whether this burden-shifting framework applies in vertical merger cases.’ She didn’t have a clear directive from her own appellate court, so she looked to a similar opinion from the appellate court in Washington, D.C. However, the D.C. Circuit’s ruling is not binding in California. So, it’s possible that the 9th Circuit could take a different approach and ultimately decide that, no, actually, the burden that Judge Corley placed on the FTC was too heavy.”

Call of Duty Warzone screenshot of 3 characters walking towards the camera.

We now know that the FTC is filing an appeal on Judge Corley’s ruling. If successful, Castree explains that this appeal could force Corley to “try again under a different legal test” and “could cause enough of a delay to mess things up for Microsoft.” This could trigger a possible worst-case scenario for Microsoft. However, analysts like Severin don’t think the FTC has much ground to stand on and that the most likely outcome is that the acquisition attempt is eventually successful.

It doesn’t seem like the FTC is ready to give up and stop fighting just yet. We don’t quite know if the necessary sequence of events to prevent the acquisition from happening by July 18 will happen though. We’ll have to wait and see how the appeal plays out in the United States court system. Microsoft isn’t completely free of regulatory scrutiny, though, even if it comes out on top against the FTC. It still has the CMA to deal with.

What’s next for the CMA

In April, the CMA voiced its intent to block Microsoft’s Activision Blizzard acquisition because of the impact it could have on cloud gaming. Following Judge Corley’s decision, the CMA and Microsoft temporarily paused that litigation in the U.K. as they are “considering how the transaction might be modified in order to address those concerns in a way that’s acceptable to the CMA,” according to Brad Smith. That said, the CMA then told The Verge on Wednesday that it could potentially begin a new merger investigation if Microsoft and Activision try to restructure their deal in the U.K.

Although Castree admits that he’s not an expert in the U.K.’s anti-monopoly laws and that the CMA’s cloud gaming issues are different from the FTC’s Call of Duty focus, Castree points out the added pressure the CMA now faces as an outlier internationally. “It’s quite possible that the CMA will not want to look unreasonable as the odd man out, and that’s probably going to be in the backs of everyone’s minds as they are poised to enter into negotiations with Microsoft,” Castree tells Digital Trends.

Key art showing multiple devices playing games via the cloud.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

The U.K.-based analysts Digital Trends spoke to don’t think the CMA is as much of a threat to Microsoft now. “In the worst case, the acquisition can close without the U.K. market,” Severin admits. “In a more likely case, there will be some sort of renegotiation with CMA in the coming days, and/or Microsoft’s appeal hearing will take its course.”

Omdia Senior Principal Analyst George Jijiashvili mostly agrees, although he thinks it’s unlikely Microsoft will pull out of the market altogether. “Microsoft would probably also want to avoid having to offer a differentiated service in the U.K. due to the complexities involved,” Jijiashvili told Digital Trends. “I, therefore, think working out a deal with CMA is the most desirable outcome for Microsoft.”

What’s next?

In April, it looked like the Activision Blizzard acquisition might not happen after the CMA’s decision. Now, it seems more likely the CMA and Microsoft will want to reassess things together and come to a more amicable deal as the acquisition completes in the U.S.

Speaking to analysts and a lawyer about the outcome of these hearings, it seems likely that the deal could go through, although the FTC and CMA will continue to have objections to aspects of the acquisition. It’s possible for the purchase to not happen if some shocking new Microsoft-damning evidence emerges or the U.S. Appellate Courts reverse Judge Corley’s decision. Still, those are hypotheticals at this time.

So, what’s next? Microsoft is going to hope the FTC’s appeal is not successful — or timely enough to happen pre-merger — and will do all it can to get this Activision Blizzard acquisition done in North America before that July 18 date. The FTC and CMA are still presenting roadblocks that could negatively impact the deal, what happens over this next week will shape one of the most important moments in the history of Xbox.

Editors' Recommendations

Tomas Franzese
Gaming Staff Writer
Tomas Franzese is a Staff Writer at Digital Trends, where he reports on and reviews the latest releases and exciting…
Microsoft offered Sony a 10-year Call of Duty deal for PlayStation, report says
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2.

Microsoft reportedly offered Sony a deal to keep the Call of Duty franchise on PlayStation for 10 years, according to a report by The New York Times. The tech giant announced its intention to acquire Activision Blizzard earlier this year for almost $70 billion, but the deal has come under intense scrutiny from regulators such as the U.K.'s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) and the E.U.'s European Commission.

According to The New York Times, Microsoft said that on November 11 it had made an offer to keep Call of Duty on PlayStation for another decade. However, Sony declined to comment on this specific claim.

Read more
PlayStation and Xbox are betting big on mobile, and for good reason
The Backbone One - PlayStation Edition has a phone in it.

Sony surprised PlayStation fans August 29 when it acquired Savage Game Studios, a mobile game developer. As part of this announcement, Head of PlayStation Studios Hermen Hulst unveiled the company's new PlayStation Studios Mobile Division that "will operate independently from our console development and focus on innovative, on-the-go experiences based on new and existing PlayStation IP." The news comes in the wake of the Backbone One -- PlayStation Edition's launch and Microsoft's Activision Blizzard acquisition that will also bring Candy Crush developer King and Blizzard mobile games into Xbox Game Studios. It's clear that the big console players are investing more than ever in mobile. 
That might sound like a shocking development, especially for hardcore console and PC players who aren't fans of mobile games for various reasons, including predatory monetization practices. But when you take a step back and look at the reality of mobile gaming, it's entirely clear why two of the biggest names in console gaming want to spread their reach to an even more global and lucrative market -- especially as overseas markets further embrace mobile as a gaming platform of choice.
Finding their knack for mobile 
Focusing on console and PC gaming makes it easy to forget just how big mobile gaming is. After Microsoft's announcement of the Activision Blizzard acquisition, Omdia Principal Analyst George Jijiashvili told Digital Trends that while consumer spending on PC and console gaming is predicted to reach $62 billion this year, mobile game players will spend $111 billion overall in 2022. "If we look at our forecast for 2025, we expect the spend on console and PC games to remain relatively flat," Jijiashvili said. "However, mobile gaming is set to grow considerably." Jijiashvili's estimations also don't even consider cloud gaming, which is prevalent on mobile and is expected to grow in the coming years.

Jijiashvili highlighted that console gaming would stay healthy but somewhat stagnant as players from previous generations upgrade to PS5 and Xbox Series X. Meanwhile, he says PC gaming is falling out of favor in Asia, highlighting that a game like PUBG sees most resources assigned to the mobile game before they come over to the PC and console versions. Before the Activision Blizzard acquisition, Jijiashvili believed Xbox "desperately lacked" a strong foothold in the mobile gaming market, and it's easy for us to see that the same currently applies to PlayStation prior to the Savage Game Studios acquisition. For how important PlayStation and Xbox were to console players, companies like King and Zynga meant much more to mobile gamers for a long time. 
On top of that, mobile gaming also expands these game companies' reach to an even bigger audience. Yes, over 20 million PS5 and 117 million PS4 consoles are out there, but especially in Asian markets, mobile games will give PlayStation and Xbox much more exposure. Of course, Jijiashvili points out that just having mobile studios doesn't immediately guarantee success, as Asian mobile players favor "more hardcore games from the battle royale and MOBA genres, which have achieved great popularity and deliver strong performance." Still, Xbox and PlayStation will soon have a stronger foothold than ever on platforms and in regions where gamers playing on PC or console isn't as prevalent.
It's worth noting that both Xbox and PlayStation do have some history on mobile -- just not very successful ones. Microsoft had Windows Phones, tried to shove SmartGlass features into early Xbox One exclusives, and is currently making great strides in console gaming via the cloud on mobile. Meanwhile, PlayStation franchises like Uncharted, LittleBigPlanet, and even Knack (Knack's Quest, ladies and gentlemen) got mobile games under the "PlayStation Mobile" banner in the 2010s. These acquisitions showed renewed interest in developing games exclusively made for mobile. While we can't predict Microsoft's long-term plans for King as the Activision Blizzard deal still isn't finished, Hulst made Savage Game Studios' position within PlayStation Studios very clear.

Read more
Microsoft claims Sony pays to stop devs from adding content to Xbox Game Pass
A tv shows the new Xbox Game Pass that comes to Samsung Gaming Hub soon.

In the midst of the ongoing battle to get its $69 billion acquisition of Activision Blizzard approved by Brazil, Microsoft has accused Sony of paying for "blocking rights" to prevent developers from adding their games to Xbox Game Pass.

The company filed a claim to the South American country's Administrative Council for Economic Defense (CADE) on Tuesday, commenting that Sony has been actively trying to inhibit the growth of Game Pass by keeping certain games from appearing on Microsoft's game-streaming service. In the claim, Microsoft says Sony is paying developers to keep their games out of Game Pass out of exclusivity fears. In other words, it's concerned that some of the Activision Blizzard games that are on PlayStation Plus, like games in the Call of Duty series, may become a Game Pass exclusive once the deal closes -- a concern that Microsoft deems incoherent.

Read more