Skip to main content

Convenient? Yes, but it turns out Kinect was never essential for Xbox One

microsoft xbox gamescom 2014 livestream brian heater one kinnect
At the introduction of the Xbox One, Microsoft made it clear the Kinect was an integral part of the experience. Image used with permission by copyright holder

For the better part of a year, Microsoft stood firm. There could be no Xbox One without Kinect — just as there could be no Kinect without Xbox One. In spite of early and regular criticism of the forced bundle, which tipped the system’s price $100 over the competing PlayStation 4, Microsoft insisted that that peripheral was an integral part of the package. Taking away the Kinect would be like selling the Xbox without a power cord. 

“Xbox One is Kinect. They are not separate systems,” Xbox exec Phil Harrison reiterated only last August. “An Xbox One has chips, it has memory, it has Blu-ray, it has Kinect, it has a controller. These are all part of the platform ecosystem.” 

It’s a case of pushing for too much change too soon.

Everything from gesture-based gaming to menu controls get better on Xbox One with the bundled Kinect. It was a surprise, then, when the company backed off last week, announcing that, come June, gamers will finally be able to pick up the console sans-Kinect. It’s practically a repeat of what happened in 2013, when Microsoft backed off of the immediately unpopular DRM policies and always-online requirements that were to be the foundation of the Xbox One ecosystem. Kudos to the company for once again listening and responding to consumer feedback. That it took so long for this change to happen is simply evidence of the long-term investment in Kinect. 

To move more systems and keep up with the hot-selling PlayStation 4, this decision makes a lot of sense. The considerable $100 price brings it in line with that system, making it much more competitive, especially given the need to grow the Xbox One’s audience beyond existing fans from the previous hardware generation. But in light of Microsoft’s original Xbox mission statement, it’s hard not to see this move as an admission of defeat. 

Selling the Xbox without the Kinect tosses any notion of necessity out the window, particularly since neither Sony nor Nintendo saw fit to make motion and voice control a wholly integral aspect of their own next-gen consoles. This isn’t the first time Microsoft has had to step back from core policies. The company’s done its best in the past week to get out in front of the news as much as possible, granting interviews to explain why bundling was the right decision off the bat and why unbundling is the right decision now. 

Xbox-One_Box-Shot
The new Xbox One bundle comes without Kinect, but sells for only $399. Image used with permission by copyright holder

“I think it was the right call to bundle with Kinect,” Xbox’s chief marketing and strategy officer, Yusuf Mehdi, told Forbes shortly after last week’s announcement. “In the beginning of a new console generation, you’re trying to set the bar for a new experience, and I think we did that with Xbox One.” Here’s where the pivot comes in: “The original vision we had for Xbox One [was as] an all-in-one entertainment device, and it still is, even with the $399 SKU. You still get Xbox One … where you can still watch live TV, do two things at once, input switch.” This is the definition of damage control; Mehdi’s reminding everyone that there’s still wonderful, multifaceted functionality to be enjoyed even without the motion-sensing peripheral in the box. 

Ultimately, Microsoft hasn’t backed off from the necessity of the Kinect, it’s just moved the goal post. Medhi again: “The way I look at it is that you should take a five-year vision. I think in five years, we will laugh at any computing device you can’t walk up to and talk to. Voice is going to be there for all devices.” The long game for Xbox One is integrated voice and motion control across the board, but the unbundling in the here and now is an acknowledgment of the high cost connected to enforced early adoption. 

“In five years, we will laugh at any computing device you can’t walk up to and talk to.”

To put it more simply, Microsoft has realized that the Xbox One cannot compete in a marketplace where its principal competitor sells what is ultimately a similar experience for $100 less. Much like the unpopular and now-banished DRM policies and always-on requirements of 2013, it’s a case of pushing for too much change too soon. Microsoft made buying Kinect with your console a necessity, but it didn’t provide a compelling enough reason. 

As such, the initial decision may have done the technology more harm than good, creating a backlash and turning many potential customers off from the system altogether. It’s going to be some time before Xbox fans warm to an ever-improving Kinect. The onus is on Microsoft to demonstrate how this technology promises to shape the future of gaming and entertainment.

Editors' Recommendations

Brian Heater
Brian Heater has worked at number of tech pubs, including Engadget, PCMag and Laptop. His writing has appeared in Spin…
Xbox has no plans to make its own handheld system, per leaked documents
The Logitech G Cloud Gaming Handheld sits on a stack of comics.

As part of the massive Xbox leak that came as part of its FTC trial, we got a look at Microsoft's road map for Xbox through 2030. One slide of this presentation outlines the kinds of hardware possible for Microsoft to make (and not make) itself. Most notably, Microsoft states in this document that making a dedicated Xbox handheld is "not in scope for first party."

Microsoft has been an avid supporter of devices like the Logitech G Cloud Gaming Handheld and ROG Ally with Xbox Cloud Gaming, but it was still quite surprising that the company never aimed to release a handheld that competed with those and Nintendo Switch itself. Now, we know that as far back as this May 2022 roadmap, Microsoft did not believe it currently has the resources and scope to make a Handheld.

Read more
Every blockbuster reveal from the Xbox leak: new consoles, Bethesda games, and more
Xbox's logo used during the Extended Games Showcase

Unredacted documents submitted and made publicly available to view as part of the ongoing Microsoft vs. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) trial just led to what may be the biggest leak in video game history.
A flood of files have revealed deep secrets about Xbox's upcoming plans for the bulk of the decade, giving us unprecedented insight into what's on the horizon for the gaming giant. That includes information on upcoming hardware refreshes, next-gen consoles, and unannounced Bethesda titles, as well as a further peek into Microsoft's acquisition ambitions. It's a lot to trudge through, so we've rounded up five key revelations that you'll want to know.
A new Xbox Series X model is coming next year
https://twitter.com/stephentotilo/status/1704121068519133313
The most shocking thing to leak as part of the trial is a new Xbox Series X model. Referred to as "Brooklin -- Xbox Series X Refresh" in the leaked documents, this is a diskless, cylindrical version of the Xbox Series X with 2TB of internal storage, a USB-C port, and smaller technical improvements to the system's Wi-Fi, PSU, standby mode, and more. An upgraded Xbox Series S code-named Ellewood may also be in the works and released before Brooklin.
If Microsoft still follows the plan laid out in this "Roadmap to 2030" document created in May 2022, it would release Brooklin in late October 2024 for $500. If Microsoft still plans to release Brooklin next year, it does contradict recent statements from Xbox chief Phil Spencer, who acted bearish on the idea of a mid-gen refresh in Gamescom interviews. It's possible Microsoft's plans have changed since these leaked documents were made, but if not, we now know what to expect in terms of Microsoft's console refreshes.
A new Xbox controller is in the works
https://twitter.com/charlieINTEL/status/1704088621475598345
Throughout that Brooklin leak, a new version of the Xbox Series X controller is also teased. The Xbox Series X controller is great, but lacks the unique features of controllers like the DualSense or Joy-Cons, so it makes sense Microsoft would want to change that. Referred to as "Sebile -- The New Xbox Controller," this controller can seamlessly pair and connect to the cloud.
It also will feature haptic feedback, an accelerometer gyro, quieter buttons, modular thumbsticks, a rechargeable and swappable battery, and the ability to wake just by being picked up. The same road map that lists Brooklin and Ellewood's release windows says the Sebile controller will launch sometime in late May 2024 for $70.
First details on Microsoft's next-gen console leak
https://twitter.com/AR12Gaming/status/1704102055206322389
It's hard to believe we're almost already three years into this console generation and that Microsoft is planning for its next major console release, but that is the case. Unfortunately for Microsoft, its current technical ambitions for the platform were included in this leak. A leaked document states that Microsoft's ultimate goal is to "develop a next-generation hybrid game platform capable of leveraging the combined power of the client and cloud to deliver deeper immersion and entirely new classes of game experiences." 
In practice, a list of technical improvements lays out that we can expect an ARM64 CPU that balances big and little cores, a GPU co-designed with AMD, and an NPU that balances "the desire for flexible, programmable ML silicon versus high-performance silicon for targeted workloads," as well as support for better ray tracing, global illumination, micropolygon rendering, and an ML-based Super Resolution. Microsoft also mentions a "thin OS" meant for cheaper consumer and handled devices, likely to play games via the cloud.
This next-gen console is currently slated for a 2028 launch.
Several upcoming Bethesda games leak

Enough about hardware -- several upcoming Bethesda games also leaked. A document from 2020 outlining Bethesda's game road map through fiscal year 2024 includes some games we don't know about. Alongside games we know of like MachineGames' Indiana Jones project, the list also includes several code-named projects, remasters of The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion and Fallout 3, a GhostWire: Tokyo sequel, Doom Year Zero, and Dishonored 3.
Another document also confirmed that The Elder Scrolls VI won't launch until at least 2026. Some of these games have missed the release windows listed in the documents, so it's very possible that these dates are no longer accurate and that some may not be released at all. Still, it lays out a clear picture of what was in development at Bethesda just a few years ago and provides insight into the lineup that enticed Microsoft to purchase Bethesda in the first place. 
Microsoft considered acquiring Nintendo and Warner Bros. Interactive
https://twitter.com/tomwarren/status/1704021807341203802
A leaked email from 2020 gives some insight into Spencer's acquisition ambitions at that point. Namely, it sounds like he'd love to acquire Nintendo as it would be a "career moment" for him.
"I totally agree that Nintendo is THE prime asset for us in gaming, and today gaming is a most likely path to consumer relevance," he wrote. "I've had numerous conversations with the LT of Nintendo about tighter collaboration and feel like if any U.S. company would have a chance with Nintendo, we are probably in the best position ... At some point, getting Nintendo would be a career moment and I honestly believe a good move for both companies."
Ultimately, Spencer didn't want to do a hostile takeover of Nintendo, so he settled for playing the "long game" when it came to acquiring it. This same email also reveals that Microsoft was interested in acquiring Warner Bros. Interactive around the same time as Bethesda, although the lack of any WB IP ownership was its undoing, Spencer is also as intrigued about acquiring Valve as it was Nintendo.
It's worth noting that this email is from over three years ago, and these acquisition ambitions might have been quelled following changing economic conditions and the rocky and expensive process of acquiring Activision Blizzard. 

Read more
You don’t need an Xbox Series X to play Starfield. Here’s how
Key art for Starfield

Starfield is the highest-profile Xbox Series X and Xbox Series S game since Halo Infinite, but the game isn't locked to those two consoles. Thanks to cloud gaming and Microsoft's more open-ended mentality of making its games available on a wide variety of platforms, you don't have to own one of Microsoft's current-gen systems or have the Xbox app installed on your PC.
No, it's not on PS5 or Nintendo Switch, but if you want to play Starfield while it's at the center of the video game industry zeitgeist, here are some places where it's playable other than the Xbox Series X, Xbox Series X, and Xbox PC app.
Steam

The most obvious choice if you want to play Starfield elsewhere is to pick it up on Steam. While Microsoft does have a proprietary PC launcher of its own, Microsoft now consistently releases its own games through Valve's launcher. Bethesda joined Xbox Game Studios in 2021 and has a long history of making its games available on Steam as well, so it's not too surprising that Starfield is available on the platform.
Starfield already proving quite popular on the platform too, having peaked at 266,000 concurrent players, according to SteamDB at the time I'm writing this. If you're looking for a way to play Starfield natively on the hardware you own without using a Microsoft platform or service, this is your best option. It'll run on Steam Deck too, although that's not the only way to experience Starfield on the go.
Xbox Game Pass app on Android

Read more