Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Gaming
  3. News

Put down the pitchforks: Microsoft relents, reverses maligned Xbox One policies

Adam Rosenberg
By
E3-Tech-Preview-Xbox-One
Image used with permission by copyright holder

The Xbox One will no longer require access to an active Internet connection every 24 hours, and there won’t be any restriction on the trading and sharing of games. Confirmation comes directly from Microsoft president of interactive entertainment business Don Mattrick in a new update on Xbox.com.

“Since unveiling our plans for Xbox One, my team and I have heard directly from many of you, read your comments and listened to your feedback. I would like to take the opportunity today to thank you for your assistance in helping us to reshape the future of Xbox One,” Mattrick writes.

Recommended Videos

“You told us how much you loved the flexibility you have today with games delivered on disc. The ability to lend, share, and resell these games at your discretion is of incredible importance to you. Also important to you is the freedom to play offline, for any length of time, anywhere in the world.”

Related

The note goes on to confirm the above items in a pair of bold-faced bullet points:

  • An internet connection will not be required to play offline Xbox One games– After a one-time system set-up with a new Xbox One, you can play any disc based game without ever connecting online again. There is no 24 hour connection requirement and you can take your Xbox One anywhere you want and play your games, just like on Xbox 360.
  • Trade-in, lend, resell, gift, and rent disc based games just like you do today – There will be no limitations to using and sharing games, it will work just as it does today on Xbox 360.

Digital delivery continues to be a big part of the next-gen hardware, and Mattrick confirms that Xbox One titles will be available via Xbox Live on the day of release. These, too, will be playable offline, and it seems that access to them won’t be bound by any regional restrictions. Those who opt for physical media instead will continue to be required to have the game disc in the tray, just like the Xbox 360.

This is not an unexpected move. The company’s E3 2013 presence, as we suggested during the show last week, was all about the games. Policy changes were practically inevitable in light of the public outcry that followed the initial reveal of Xbox One policies and Sony’s own announcements concerning the PlayStation 4. That those changes came so quickly can be read as an acknowledgement that, as Mattrick says, Microsoft was indeed listening.

Editors' Recommendations

Topics
Adam Rosenberg
Adam Rosenberg
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Previously, Adam worked in the games press as a freelance writer and critic for a range of outlets, including Digital Trends…
Microsoft beat the FTC. Here’s what the controversial court ruling means for Xbox
Xbox's logo used during the Extended Games Showcase

You’ve probably heard that the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) lost its case against Microsoft after an exciting and revelatory trial. On Tuesday, Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley denied FTC's motion for a preliminary injunction to block Microsoft’s acquisition of Activision Blizzard before its potential completion by July 18. Ultimately, Corley did not believe that Microsoft owning Call of Duty would “substantially lessen competition” in the game industry. It was major win for Microsoft after months of regulatory hoops and roadblocks, but the FTC quickly moved to appeal the decision. This all raises an important question: What’s next?

Over the next week, Microsoft, Activision Blizzard, and the FTC will determine the fate of the gaming companies involved in this acquisition and set a precedent for the future of the game industry. On top of that, Microsoft still has to deal with the next moves made by the U.K.'s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), which wants to block the acquisition due to its impact on cloud gaming. Following the release of Judge Corley’s Preliminary Injunction Opinion, I spoke to two analysts and a lawyer with knowledge of the video game industry to better understand what lies ahead for Microsoft and Activision, the FTC, and the CMA. The battle isn't quite over yet, even if the end is finally on the horizon.
What’s next for Microsoft and Activision Blizzard
Currently, Microsoft and Activision are in a solid position, as a Judge has ruled that Microsoft is unlikely to pull Call of Duty from PlayStation or lessen competition in the game console, cloud gaming, or game subscription markets by acquiring Activision Blizzard. There’s a temporary restraining order in place until July 14, which the FTC hopes to successfully appeal during. As soon as that order is up, though, Microsoft and Activision Blizzard have until July 18 to complete the acquisition.

Read more
Microsoft wins FTC case, removing Xbox’s biggest Activision Blizzard acquisition hurdle
Characters shooting in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2.

Following a multi-week court case, Microsoft has won its battle with the Federal Trade Commission regarding its proposed Activision Blizzard acquisition. The ruling is a major win for Microsoft's troubled deal, clearing the biggest hurdle it faced.

Last January, Microsoft announced its intention to acquire Activision Blizzard for $69 billion. The blockbuster announcement immediately raised antitrust concerns, which resulted in the FTC filing a legal challenge in December 2022. Microsoft has not been able to proceed with the acquisition since then, as its faced similar scrutiny in the U.K.

Read more
Microsoft to pay $20M over Xbox child privacy violations
Microsoft signage at the Meridian Building (formerly CompuWare) in Detroit, Michigan.

Microsoft has agreed to pay $20 million to U.S. regulators for violating the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA).

The breach involved the computer giant collecting and retaining personal information from children who set up an Xbox account prior to obtaining permission from their parents.

Read more