Skip to main content

Aereo’s quasilegal TV streaming is just what we need to slap big media awake

Aereo iPad App

In case you haven’t been following the uproar over the little-known startup Aereo lately, allow me to summarize: A bunch of brilliant nerds are legally making money distributing content they don’t own on the Internet, it’s perfectly legal, and TV networks are pissed.

Aereo first ruffled antennas back in 2012 when it began recording live over-the-air television — the stuff you pick up with any TV for free — and charging consumers a monthly fee to stream that content online. Because the Supreme Court established all the way back in 1983 that “time-shifting” television for your own use is perfectly legal and affirmed that streaming that time-shifted content is legal in 2008, networks don’t have much legal ground to stand on. You’re basically paying Aereo to lease an antenna and DVR with your name on it, not for the content you actually stream.

Aereo antenna (array)
An array of Aereo’s antennas. Each subscriber gets an antenna to their name.

Here’s the beauty: Whether you see Aereo as an opportunistic leech or a forward-thinking engine of innovation, the disruption the NYC-based startup causes as it crashes through the gridlock of status quo like a nuclear icebreaker is going to benefit consumers. This is the slap in the face sleepy-eyed TV networks needed to finally wake up, set down their greasy turkey drumsticks, and get online.

For the last decade, television networks have clung to their over-the-air broadcasts with a frenzied grip, only throwing scraps of content online as a concession to the hoards of consumers demanding more flexibility over the content they watch. Sure, we’ll let you watch a few clips of last week’s American Idol online, but you’ll need to find yourself a TV on Wednesday if you want the whole thing. And you want to watch live events like the grammy online? Pfff. No.

Online viewers have always been treated as second-class citizens to the type of people who might either watch over-the-air or pay for cable. But in many cases, they’re the same people, just trying to watch shows at a more convenient time, or on a more convenient device like an iPad or laptop.

Why snub Internet viewers? Advertisers still pay the bills in TV, and prime-time TV advertising still costs more than equivalent time on a site like Hulu. By allowing more people to watch shows online, networks risked siphoning off viewers from their more lucrative TV broadcasts.

Networks want you to think they’re reaching for a knife to pull a 127 Hours stunt, but we know better.

As content owners, networks have always had the choice to keep it offline, no matter how much we whined. Until now. By taking the grunt-work out of time-shifting live, over-the-air TV and conveniently streaming it to any number of devices, Aereo is essentially doing what networks always had the power to do, but selfishly refused. Now that someone else is collecting the toll, networks have no choice but to step up, or watch someone else profit from their work.

The compromise could come from offering additional programming on cooperative sites like Hulu (which Newscorp, ABC and NBC all own a stake in) or even increasing the amount of video streamed from the sites of local affiliates. Any of these routes would allow the networks to continue tracking how many people watch their shows, and prevent them from snipping out ads by fast forwarding.

Of course, there is the nuclear option. Both Fox and CBS have now threatened to shut down their free broadcasts entirely to freeze our Aereo, but that threat is almost certainly empty. Their balls are in a vice. They want you to think they’re reaching for a knife to pull a 127 Hours stunt, but we know better.

Only 10 percent of TV viewers still rely on over-the-air signals to watch TV, but dumping them into static to prevent a couple thousand Aereo viewers from watching online would almost certainly be cutting off your … nose to spite the face. Do you really think CBS’ sales guys want to go back to potential advertisers and explain that instead of giving them more eyeballs online through streaming viewers, they just voluntarily scythed viewership down by 10 percent?

So put down those bunny ears and foil. Broadcast TV is coming to the Web whether the companies that produce it want it there or not. And it’s about time.

Editors' Recommendations

Nick Mokey
As Digital Trends’ Managing Editor, Nick Mokey oversees an editorial team delivering definitive reviews, enlightening…
Google ends support for the original Chromecast
Google's first-gen Chromecast dongle.

Ten years is not a bad run in the world of smart devices. That's how long it's been since Google released the very first Chromecast, a tiny $35 HDMI dongle that let you wirelessly stream audio and video to your TV, with your phone serving as the remote. We liked it so much when it debuted, we named it the best product of 2013.

Unfortunately, all good things must pass, and 9to5Google recently noticed that Google quietly ended support for the original Chromecast on April 27, 2023, which means it will no longer get any feature or security updates.

Read more
This 65-inch Samsung 4K TV is $220 off at Best Buy
The Samsung 70-inch Class 7 Series 4K TV in a living room.

Best Buy is the place to shop for TV deals. We saw a lot of fantastic discounts during Memorial Day weekend, and Best Buy has extended a few past that official sale. For instance, this 65-inch Samsung TU690T 4K TV is down to just $450 from its usual $670. That's a nice discount of $220, bringing this mid-priced TV into budget TV territory. This deal has been live for a while now, but don't get too comfortable with it. It could end at any moment.

Why you should buy the Samsung 65-inch TU690T 4K TV
As one of the best TV brands around, it's always worth considering buying a Samsung TV. In the case of this Samsung 65-inch TU690T 4K TV, while the best TVs may have moved onto OLED or QLED technology, this is still a very fine example of 4K.

Read more
Get these Philips water-resistant wireless earbuds for $18
philips t2206 true wireless earbuds deal woot june 2023 lifestyle image

Regular readers will know roughly what kind of headphone deals unfold each day and will get why we're stunned by being able to buy true wireless earbuds for just $18. The earbuds in question are Philips T2206 True Wireless Earbuds so they're not exactly the very best, but they are incredibly cheap. The deal is available at Woot where the earbuds normally retail at $50 so you're saving 64% off the regular price. If you have a Prime membership, you also get free standard shipping included in the deal. Sound tempting? Let's take a look at what else you need to know.

Why you should buy the Philips T2206 True Wireless Earbuds
In an ideal world, you might want the very best headphones but there's invariably a catch. The obvious one is money -- amazing headphones aren't cheap -- but you might also be someone that's prone to losing their earbuds frequently and it's pretty painful to spend hundreds of dollars on earbuds that you soon misplace. That's where the Philips T2206 True Wireless Earbuds come in. At this price, they're bordering on disposable.

Read more