Skip to main content

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

Apple’s long-delayed BeatsX wireless headphones will be released February 10

Last year was a rough one for Apple when it came to headphones. Its own true wireless headphones, the AirPods, were originally scheduled to ship in October, but only became available for purchase in December. That same day, another audio product from the company — the BeatsX wireless earphones — had its release pushed back to February 2017. Fortunately, Apple has held to its word, and the headphones will arrive later this week.

Alongside the launch of the iPhone 7, the first not to include a headphone jack, Apple announced a total of four wireless headphone options: the AirPods, and three Beats-branded products, all of which are powered by its W1 chip. The two other Beats products announced — the Solo3 and the Powerbeats3 — shipped in 2016.

Recommended Videos

It seemed that the headphones’ release was imminent when models began showing up in various Apple stores, but as of this morning, the product page for the BeatsX still simply reads that the headphones are coming in February 2017. The official release date was instead revealed by the official Beats By Dre Twitter account via a tweet containing a short video clip and the words “available Feb. 10.”

Apple has yet to confirm the reason behind the delay of its AirPods or the BeatsX, but the fact that both products use the W1 chip could have something to do with the delay — but it wouldn’t explain why the Solo3 and Powerbeats3, also powered by the W1 chip, have launched without issue.

Unlike those headphones, which recharge via Micro USB, the BeatsX use a Lightning port to recharge. The BeatsX also feature a Fast Fuel feature that promises users two hours of playback from a five-minute charge. This also may have had something to do with the delay, but for now, we have no way of knowing what the culprit is.

Once the BeatsX are available, they will retail for $150. If you’d rather opt for something else, the Beats Powerbeats3 sell for $200, while Apple’s AirPods sell for $160.

Story originally published on December 16, 2016. Updated by Kris Wouk on 02-07-2017: Edited to add the official release information for the Beats X. 

Kris Wouk
Former Contributor
Kris Wouk is a tech writer, gadget reviewer, blogger, and whatever it's called when someone makes videos for the web. In his…
Apple Watch X: The 9 biggest things I want to see
watchOS 10 running on an Apple Watch Ultra.

The original Apple Watch was announced in September 2014, with Apple's first smartwatch released in April 2015. Lat year, we got the Apple Watch Series 9 and Apple Watch Ultra 2, both of which were relatively iterative upgrades. Now, we should focus on what Apple could be doing for the 10th anniversary of the Apple Watch, similar to what the company did with the 10th anniversary of the iPhone, which gave us the iPhone X.

Rumors suggest that this anniversary smartwatch could be called the “Apple Watch X," and we could see it later this year or, more likely, in 2025.

Read more
Does Apple Music sound weak? It’s not your headphones’ fault
Man wearing Beats Studio Pro (front view).

A lot of folks got a new set of Apple or Beats wireless headphones or earbuds for the holidays, only to discover that things don't sound as good as expected when listening to Apple Music. If that's been your experience too, don't worry -- it's very unlikely that your new wireless earbuds or headphones are to blame.

The real culprit is Apple Music itself. That sounds like hooey, especially if you're a longtime Apple Music listener and it's never been a problem for you in the past. But if your previous earbuds or headphones were made by a company other than Apple or Beats, you may not realize that Apple Music treats Apple and Beats products a little differently.
The Dolby Atmos default

Read more
The Apple M1X may not be called ‘M1X’ at all
Apple M1 chip on a motherboard.

Update: As was announced at the Apple Unleashed event, this rumor about the M1 Pro and M1 Max turned out to be true.

Apple's hotly-anticipated M1X chip may not be called the "M1X" at all. App logs have revealed names like "M1 Pro" and "M1 Max," suggesting that Apple is taking a different approach to naming with its M1 refresh. We'll know in a few short hours, with Apple's Unleashed event going live shortly.

Read more