Skip to main content

Why you’re right to fear the Comcast-Time Warner Cable mega-merger from hell

can comcasts new image change loathed loved comcast center sky
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Comcast confirmed this morning its plans to devour Time Warner Cable. For just $45.2 billion worth of stock, Comcast will control the Internet connections of some 30 million Americans – far more than any other Internet service provider in the US – super-sizing an ISP monster into an IPS Franken-colossus larger than nearly any other ISP on the planet.

Let’s just cut to the heart of this beast. This deal holds few conceivable benefit to consumers.

The merger would not hurt competition because there already is no competition.

The heads of Comcast and Time Warner Cable – two of the least liked companies in America – tout dreams of a rosy utopia where Comcast “will accelerate the pace of that innovation,” as Robert D. Marcus, Chairman and CEO of Time Warner Cable, said in a press release. That means “a superior video experience, higher broadband speeds, and the fastest in-home Wi-Fi,” writes Comcast. A Comcast-TWC uber-corp could accelerate rollout of streaming television service, advance technology standards, and expedite widespread adoption of next-generation set-top box technology, like Apple TV, Roku, and the Xbox One.

Except, history shows us that this deal will likely stifle competition, slow innovation, reduce content options, shut out potential competitors, and boost prices for customers all at once. We may get innovation, but it will be entirely on Comcast’s terms.

“An enlarged Comcast would be the bully in the schoolyard, able to dictate terms to content creators, Internet companies, other communications networks that must interconnect with it, and distributors who must access its content,” John Bergmayer, Senior Staff Attorney for Public Knowledge, said in response to the deal. “By raising the costs of its rivals and business partners, an enlarged Comcast would raise costs for consumers, who ultimately pay the bills. It would be able to keep others from innovating, while facing little pressure to improve its own service. New equipment, new services, and new content would have to meet with its approval to stand any chance of succeeding.”

Robert D. Marcus,
Robert D. Marcus, Chairman and CEO of Time Warner Cable Image used with permission by copyright holder

Free Press President and CEO Craig Aaron echoed these concerns, calling the deal “a disaster for consumers” that “must be stopped.”

“No one woke up this morning wishing their cable company was bigger or had more control over what they could watch or download,” he said. “But that – along with higher bills – is the reality they’ll face tomorrow unless the Department of Justice and the FCC do their jobs and block this merger. Stopping this kind of deal is exactly why we have antitrust laws.”

The frustrating reality is that Internet customers already suffer from a lack of competition. ISPs like Comcast and TWC have enormous power to control market prices, and introduce higher broadband speeds at their leisure (or not at all). It lets them to nickel and dime customers with data caps – a dishonest revenue-boosting tactic that Comcast imposes on its customers but TWC currently does not – at the expense of impotent subscribers who have nowhere else to turn.

And yet Comcast claims this lack of competition among ISPs is the very reason the Justice Department and FCC should approve the deal. “Comcast and Time Warner Cable do not compete in a single zip code in America,” explained Comcast executive vice president David Cohen during a conference call today. So the merger would not hurt competition because there already is no competition.

Let’s just cut to the heart of this beast. This deal holds few conceivable benefit to consumers.

In other words, the Comcast-TWC deal moves the Internet service industry in exactly the wrong direction. As former FCC Commissioner Mignon Clyburn said in 2010, “Competition is the lifeblood of investment, innovation, and affordable prices. Without it, industry has little reason to upgrade its facilities and improve its services. … Thus, only in those areas where Americans are lucky enough to have more than one provider with truly high-speed capability will providers … have any economic incentive to offer better service.”

What America needs is a greater number of ISPs that are forced to compete with each other over price and technology, not fewer. Not consolidation. Not market domination so extreme that it essentially guarantees no new entrants into the market.

The single silver lining for customers is that a new, bigger Comcast could expedite the shift from cable TV to Internet-streaming. Comcast lost 305,000 video subscribers in 2013, but gained 1.3 million Internet customers. TWC saw a similar shift, having lost 831,000 video subscribers last year, while continuing to gain tens of thousands of broadband customers each quarter. This natural shift in customer preference may push Comcast to establish more robust streaming options for “cord cutters” (who, incidentally, aren’t really cutting the cord; they’re just switching to a different type).

I’m just not sure the possibility of expanded Internet TV options is worth consolidation of power inherent in this deal. Either way, the Comcast-TWC buyout is sure to undergo rigorous scrutiny by federal regulators. But with enough concessions to the FCC – an agency that has long failed to help increase competition ISPs – it just might go through.

So fingers crossed, Internet users. It’s bad now, but the worst may be yet to come.

Andrew Couts
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Features Editor for Digital Trends, Andrew Couts covers a wide swath of consumer technology topics, with particular focus on…
One of our favorite 75-inch 4K TVs is 34% off at Amazon
Hisense U8G 4K ULED HDR TV

Is it time to upgrade your TV? If you're planning to get a massive display for your living room, look no further than the 75-inch Hisense U8 Series ULED 4K TV. From its original price of $1,950, it's down to $1,290 from Amazon following a 34% discount. It's still not cheap by any means, but if you want nothing but the best for your home entertainment needs, this is the kind of purchase from TV deals that you should be willing to make. We're not sure how much time is remaining before the $660 in savings disappears though, so you better hurry with the transaction if you're interested in this 4K TV.

Why you should buy the 75-inch Hisense U8 Series ULED 4K TV
Hisense is one of the best TV brands, and it uses its mini-LED QLED technology, which it calls ULED, in its premium models like the Hisense U8 Series ULED 4K TV -- one of our best TVs. You'll be enjoying excellent contrast and vivid colors, for image quality that challenges those from the best models of Samsung, Sony, and LG. The 4KT V also supports Dolby Vision IQ and Dolby Atmos, which combine to create a truly cinematic experience in the comfort of your own living room while you're watching streaming shows through the Google TV platform.

Read more
Ends tonight: Save $400 on the 50-inch Samsung Frame TV
Samsung's 65-inch Class 'The Frame' QLED 4K Smart TV displaying a famous oil painting.

If you want a unique TV to place in your living room or anywhere else around your home, you should check out Samsung's The Frame QLED 4K TV. It's a top-performance screen, a conversation starter, and as of right now, the 50-inch model is $400 off from Best Buy for a lowered price of $900 from $1,300. This opportunity at savings ends tonight though, so if you're interested in taking advantage of one of the most interesting TV deals we've recently seen, there's no time to waste -- add it to your cart and check out as soon as you can.

Why you should buy the 50-inch Samsung The Frame QLED 4K TV
Samsung, one of the best TV brands, knocks it out of the park in terms of performance and design with The Frame QLED 4K TV. It features the most advanced display technology that's found in the best TVs, including 4K Ultra HD resolution that promises sharp and lifelike details, Quantum HDR that delivers an even wider range of color and contrast, and Samsung's Tizen platform that enables access to all of the popular streaming services. It's also a QLED TV, which offers higher brightness, a longer life span, no risk of screen burn-in, and a lower cost on a price-per-inch of screen size basis compared to OLED TVs, according to our QLED versus OLED comparison.

Read more
This 65-inch Samsung OLED TV is $500 off for a limited time
The Samsung S90C in a living room environment.

Best Buy has one of the better TV deals currently around if you're looking for a high-end OLED TV for less. Over at the popular retailer, you can buy the Samsung 65-inch S90C OLED TV for $1,600 thereby saving $500 off the usual price of $2,100. This is a well-sized TV for most living rooms while also packing all the essential features you need to enjoy a great visual experience while you game or watch a movie. If you're tempted but not entirely sure, read on while we take you through what the TV offers.

Why you should buy the Samsung 65-inch S90C OLED TV
Samsung is one of the best TV brands you can buy from at the moment with its S90C OLED TV a particular highlight. As the name suggests, you get OLED technology which is a great starting point for any high-end TV. It means you get a panel with self-lit pixels so that each pixel can be illuminated independently of each other. That ensures you can enjoy deep blacks and vibrant colors all on one scene without any quality being compromised. HDR OLED goes one step further by analyzing each scene so you get richer and more accurate colors than regular OLED. The TV is also Pantone validated so that you get colors looking just how they should.

Read more