Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Audio / Video
  3. Entertainment
  4. Features

‘Twin Peaks’ explained, ‘Part 10:’ Men behaving badly

Add as a preferred source on Google

Amid the various digressions and riddles presented in each new episode of Twin Peaks, you’d be excused for openly wondering on occasion just what exactly this show is about — not just narratively, but thematically. While there are many angles you could take — the town of Twin Peaks itself, beset by substance abuse, could be read as a requiem for small town America — one of the most prominent strains in the show, both in the original run and the new, is the presentation of evil.

Evil in Twin Peaks is often depicted in otherworldly figures, such as the woodsmen or the Black Lodge, the nightmarish home of menacing spirits like BOB and the Man from Another Place. But evil also tends to manifest in mundane ways. Even BOB, the body-snatching archvillain of the original show, most often took the form of an ordinary, if creepy, man in a trucker jacket. In The Return, Cooper’s doppelgänger, the primary antagonist, is similarly ordinary: He’s just Cooper with a leather jacket and a flowing mane, the kind of person who wouldn’t look out of place browsing the metal section at a record store.

Image used with permission by copyright holder

Villainy in Twin Peaks is distressingly ordinary, and Part 10 exemplifies this, opening on two acts of disturbingly realistic violence and abuse. The episode begins with Richard Horne (Eamon Farren), having run over a child in a previous episode, arriving at the home of the witness who saw him driving, Miriam Sullivan.

Recommended Videos

Richard wears a mask of friendliness at first, but his reflection looms in Miriam’s glass door, and he drops his charade when she reveals that she sent written testimony to the sheriff. He bursts through her door in a fury.

Image used with permission by copyright holder

A number of critics over the years have accused Lynch’s works of misogyny: In his review of Blue Velvet, Roger Ebert decried the depravity shown toward Isabella Rossellini’s character, even describing Lynch as “sadistic.” It’s a strain of thought that’s still present in criticism of the new run of Twin Peaks. The accusations maintain that Lynch’s camera revels in the destruction of the female body.

Yet when Richard tramples into Miriam’s home, the camera does not follow. Instead it remains still, watching the motorhome tremble as we hear the violence within. The show refrains from showing us the attack, keeping the audience at a distance, a voyeur disturbed by the implied violence.

Image used with permission by copyright holder

A similar moment follows, when the show shifts to Carl Rodd’s (Harry Dean Stanton) trailer park. Carl sits outside, strumming a guitar and singing. It’s a gentle moment, shattered by a mug flying through the window of a nearby trailer.

Image used with permission by copyright holder

The camera pans up to the broken window, as we hear yelling from within, and the camera lingers a while. Rodd does not intervene; he simply shakes his head and mutters that the situation is a “fucking nightmare.”

Image used with permission by copyright holder

The show then cuts to the inside of the trailer, where Becky (Amanda Seyfried), last seen in a blissful, drug-induced haze with her husband Steven (Caleb Landry Jones), is now cowering on a couch as Steven screams at her, snot and spittle dripping from his face. While their relationship hardly seemed a storybook romance in the first place — he was unemployed, she was borrowing money from her mom to maintain their lifestyle — in this moment it is truly grotesque.

In both these scenes, Lynch keeps the audience outside at first. Like Carl, we hear the disturbance, and are forced to wonder — though it doesn’t take much imagination — what is happening within. While some might call it voyeuristic, the scenes render us all neighbors who hear a couple fighting next door, disturbed by the implication of domestic violence but unwilling or unable to act on that disgust.

Twin Peaks has always found evil in the shadowed corners of mundane life, and the show’s villains, as mentioned, often aren’t villains, but mere men who do their evil just out of sight. Leland Palmer (Ray Wise), the seemingly ideal American father, molested his daughter for years under the influence of BOB, eventually killing her and setting the show’s original mystery in motion. Richard Horne beats Miriam unconscious and leaves her to die, turning on her gas oven and lighting a candle. He later forces his way into his grandmother’s house, throwing her to the ground and demanding money. Steven Burnett raises a fist as he berates his wife.

Like the drugs that flow through Twin Peaks’ dive bars and back alleys, violence is lurking behind closed doors, carried out by mortal men.

Will Nicol
Will Nicol is a Senior Writer at Digital Trends. He covers a variety of subjects, particularly emerging technologies, movies…
I desperately want a new classic Walkman, but Sony probably can’t give me one
Tech minimalism is begging for a new Walkman. Though rebuilding it may be close to impossible
Sony Walkman WM2011

Every few months, another piece of tech that seems obsolete crawls out of a drawer and becomes cool again. The age of minimalism has revived the popularity of iPods among younger buyers. Dumbphones have become an escape hatch from endless notifications. Similarly, digital cameras are dangling from bags again. Physical media keeps attracting people who want something they can actually hold instead of another frustrating subscription.

All of this makes it the perfect time for Sony to bring back the classic Walkman, which was a phenomenon during the 80s and 90s. I would love one. Give me a compact cassette player, physical buttons, and wired headphones. Keep the apps, notifications, and algorithms that shape your taste of music. No more AI assistants or personalzied feeds, just you and your Walkman. There is only one problem though. Recreating the Walkman that people love and remember, would be far harder than putting an old design back into production.

Read more
Proton reveals how smart TVs track you and the escape situation is pretty grim 
Modern smart TVs fingerprint your screen content at the chipset level.
Google TV applications on the Sony A95K TV.

Your smart TV may know far more about your viewing habits than you realize, even if you rarely use its smart features. In a new privacy explainer, Proton warns that many modern TVs quietly collect data about everything displayed on the screen and share it with manufacturers, advertisers, and analytics companies.

The worrying part is that escaping this tracking is becoming increasingly difficult because many privacy controls are buried deep in settings or enabled by default. Proton argues that buying a smart TV today often means accepting a level of surveillance that most people never knowingly signed up for.

Read more
LG is cracking down on smart TV apps that quietly turn your TV into a secret proxy
LG OLED Settings

If you own an LG smart TV, there's a chance one of your harmless-looking apps has been moonlighting as an internet relay for someone else's traffic. According to a report from KrebsOnSecurity, LG says it's finally stepping in to stop this menace. This week, the company confirmed it plans to suspend any webOS app that turns a TV into what's called a residential proxy node.

The move follows a report from security firm Spur, which found that more than 42 percent of apps on LG's webOS store include SDKs that quietly reroute internet traffic through your TV, indefinitely. Samsung isn't spared either, with over a quarter of Tizen apps carrying similar code.

Read more