Skip to main content

Ring says it isn’t using facial recognition, but it’s definitely working on it

Ring Video Doorbell Pro
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Ring claims it isn’t using facial recognition technology — most recently in a story on its work with 400 U.S. police departments. However, the company is working on the technology, something the company has yet to publicly admit. The latest example? A response by its PR team to criticism by the Bernie Sanders presidential campaign.

Sanders deputy policy director Billy Gendell noted on Twitter Thursday that the Democratic presidential candidate is the only one in the race that would explicitly ban police from using facial recognition software.

Ring responded to Gendell’s tweet directly. “Hi Billy, this is misleading,” the company said. “Ring does not use facial recognition, and users are in control of their videos. Users can decide when they want to share footage with their local police and police go through Ring when making a request, and users can decline.”

Prime Day Focus
Roborock Prime Day shopping guide: Lots of options, which is right for you?
Is the Bluetti AC200L the best power station for camper vans?
These Razer Blade Prime Day deals really pack a punch [in gaming power]
Tiny projector, epic 4K cinema: Watch movies anywhere with LG CineBeam Q

But documents obtained by Buzzfeed continue to show the company is interested in the technology.

Buzzfeed found that the company’s Ukrainian arm has employees working on facial recognition. A cached version of the Ring Ukraine site states the company develops “semi-automated crime prevention and monitoring systems which are based on, but not limited to, face recognition.” Ring Ukraine also has a head of face recognition research, and a 2018 presentation by the individual was found online by Buzzfeed.

There is more evidence elsewhere. Last year, U.S. patents were found surrounding the identification of “suspicious individuals” from crime databases, and automatic notification of the police upon detection. There Ring downplayed the efforts, arguing that patents were no guarantee of future functionality.

In response to the Buzzfeed story, Ring again stressed that it doesn’t use facial recognition technology. But the key word is use: they might not be using facial recognition now, but are hard at work on technology that would make it possible.

Contradictory statements aside, and regardless of whether Sanders becomes president or not, law enforcement will have to contend with increasing resistance against the use of facial recognition technology to fight crime where privacy rights are involved.

Law enforcement use of facial recognition is a rare political issue that is becoming bipartisan. Voters are becoming increasingly skeptical of its use according to polls, and several cities have already banned its use. San Francisco and Oakland, California and Sommerville, Massachusetts have already done so, and several other cities are exploring similar measures.

Ed Oswald
For fifteen years, Ed has written about the latest and greatest in gadgets and technology trends. At Digital Trends, he's…
Ring Video Doorbell Pro 2 uses radar for bird’s-eye view of front door activity
ring video doorbell pro 2 uses radar technology installation 1000x1000

Ring's latest addition to its lineup of smart home security devices demonstrates exactly where the company is headed. The Ring Video Doorbell Pro 2 is a new, premium video doorbell with a host of next-generation technology to help keep your home safer than ever. The camera features 3D motion detection, 1,536p video, a Bird's Eye View feature, and customizable privacy.

Through the use of a radar sensor, the 3D motion detection technology provides more accurate and precise identification of when a motion event begins. The sensors measure an object's distance from the camera, which makes it easier to exclude certain high-traffic areas. For example, if your doorbell faces a sidewalk, you can set it so that only motion closer to your home triggers an alert.

Read more
Competition didn’t force Ring to make a cheaper doorbell. Accessibility did.
The second-generation Ring Video Doorbell installed on a front door.

Ring just announced its most affordable video doorbell to date, marking an interesting turn for the company that has long been the leader in the category. Prior to the announcement, the Ring Video Doorbell (2nd Gen) was its cheapest camera at $100 -- but now that title goes to the $60 Ring Video Doorbell Wired.

One could speculate that competition in the entry-level segment of the market forced Ring into releasing a cheaper doorbell. I thought that was the case, too, considering the number of companies currently making video doorbells. With products coming from brands such as Google, Logitech, Arlo, and August, competition has followed Ring since its first video doorbell in 2014. But in reality, this move to deliver its cheapest doorbell yet is in response to something entirely different -- and that’s the desire to make its products more accessible.

Read more
Ring tackles the entry-level market with its most affordable doorbell yet
A finger pressing a Ring video doorbell.

Ring has launched its most affordable and smallest doorbell yet. For just $60, the Ring Video Doorbell Wired is packed with all of the features users have come to expect.

It's a smart move given how rival Wyze introduced its video doorbell not too long ago for $30. A smart doorbell acts as your first line of defense, providing you with a clear view of any visitor and allowing you to keep an eye on packages dropped off at your home.

Read more