Skip to main content

No more Apples for the teacher? Schools now more likely to use Chromebooks

school computers chromebooks more than apples budgetlaptops acerchromebook15
Image used with permission by copyright holder
After a slow start in the 1980s, computers in schools are now ubiquitous. Apple controlled much of the market for decades, but its machines are no longer the most common in schools. Apple is still a player, but for several years, the Cupertino company has been losing educational market share. Windows OS system sales have crept up and now exceed iOS non-desktop devices, but the classroom increasingly belongs to Chrome OS and Chromebooks, according to Business Insider.

Selling products to schools in the U.S. has traditionally involved a marketing and branding strategy. Singer gave sewing machines to schools for Home Economics classes back when students learned how to sew. Driver’s Education classes often had free or heavily discounted use of new vehicles from local dealers.

Recommended Videos

Today the same thinking has been in play when it comes to getting computers into schools. Apple’s desktop and portable devices were the standard as early as the 1980s when Apple had special educational computer purchase programs as well as support for teachers trying to figure how to use the new technology.

Please enable Javascript to view this content

It’s ironic that current Apple CEO Tim Cook spoke dismissively of Chromebooks in December 2015, referring to them as just “test machines.” In 2015 those “test machines” accounted for 51 percent of K-12 school sales in the U.S., according to figures from FutureSource Consulting for non-desktop systems.  The same year Windows devices had a 25-percent market share. Mac OS accounted for 4 percent and iOS for 17 percent of the institutional sales.

While Windows device sales stayed roughly the same for three years, from 2013 to 2015 (ranging from 22 to 25 percent), Apple OS sales (Mac OS and iOS combined) fell from 34 percent in 2013 to 25 percent in 2014, and then to 21 percent in 2015. Clearly Apple lost share to the “test machines” as, in that same period, Chrome OS devices increased from a 38-percent to a 51-percent share. It is notable that when Cook made his comment, ChromeOS devices had already been outselling Apple OS devices handily for two years.

So what does this mean for parents today? When computers were first used in schools and most parents didn’t have a clue how to use them, it made sense to buy an Apple computer for your children to use at home. They were familiar with them and, if they had questions, teachers or other kids at school could help. Even back in the 1980’s Apple computers cost more than other brands suitable for home use, but the higher cost didn’t deter parents who often felt they had to get what was best for their kids’ education.

Today with computers becoming commodity devices, and when so much of what everyone does with them is internet-based, Chromebooks’ web utility and lower cost is a driving factor. Apple Inc. has never sought to compete on price, but that may mean the end of Apples for the teacher.

Bruce Brown
Bruce Brown Contributing Editor   As a Contributing Editor to the Auto teams at Digital Trends and TheManual.com, Bruce…
Apple will pay up to $1M to anyone who hacks its AI cloud
Apple's Craig Federighi speaking about macOS security at WWDC 2022.

Apple just made an announcement that shows it means business when it comes to keeping Apple Intelligence secure. The company is offering a massive bug bounty of up to $1 million to anyone who is able to hack its AI cloud, referred to as Private Cloud Compute (PCC). These servers will take over Apple Intelligence tasks when the on-device AI capabilities just aren't good enough -- but there are downsides, which is why Apple's bug-squashing mission seems like a good idea.

As per a recent Apple Security blog post, Apple has created a virtual research environment and opened the doors to the public to let everyone take a peek at the code and judge its security. The PCC was initially only available to a group of security researchers and auditors, but now, anyone can take a shot at trying to hack Apple's AI cloud.

Read more
Xreal vs. Apple Vision Pro: Why I chose Air 2 and Beam Pro
My two monitor PC sits unused while I use the Xreal Air 2 and Beam Pro with Bluetooth accessories.

Xreal’s latest product, the Beam Pro, turned my $400 Xreal Air 2 smart glasses into a low-cost Vision Pro alternative. While Xreal’s spatial computing solution lacks the power and sophistication of Apple’s first VR headset, it offers many similar features.

The Beam Pro can also capture 3D photos and videos to help you relive memories with Xreal Air smart glasses, which show depth and movement that make those moments come alive. Undoubtedly, Apple’s headset is currently the best solution for spatial computing, but the Vision Pro's ultra-premium $3,500 price inspired my search for a more affordable alternative.

Read more
An all-glass MacBook? Here’s what Apple thinks it would look like
Bladur's Gate 3 being played on the M3 MacBook Air.

Patents and clues pointing to all-glass MacBooks and iMacs have been floating around since 2011, and this week, another patent has appeared on Patently Apple -- a "glass housing" for a MacBook-like device. It has a virtual keyboard and trackpad, and there's even a separate patent for "finger devices" that would decrease the strain of typing on a glass surface.

One of the most interesting things about the glass housing is that it "provides I/O functionality." This means, that instead of inserting a separate trackpad or keyboard keys into the housing for users to interact with, the housing itself would provide a method of input and output. In some areas and contexts, the surface would function simply as housing to protect internal components, and in others, it would display information and react to user input.

Read more