Skip to main content

Dissatisfied iPad owners take Apple to court over AppleCare+

apple lawsuit california applecare broken iphone
Apple finds itself back in court, but instead of getting in trouble over possible patent infringement, the Cupertino company finds itself potentially in hot water over its AppleCare and AppleCare+ plans, reports AppleInsider.

The lawsuit, filed in the Northern California District Court by Vicky Maldonado and Joanne McRight, stems from Maldonado’s experience with her third-generation iPad, According to the plaintiff, her iPad’s screen cracked after she owned the tablet for six months. Because Maldonado accidentally damaged her iPad, she was told she needed to pay $250 for a replacement. Furthermore, she was told that replacing a device under AppleCare+ will cost her $100.

As a result, Maldonado purchased a fourth-generation iPad and AppleCare+ in September 2013. AppleCare+, an offshoot of the regular AppleCare, covers customers for two years and allows them to make two claims due to damage they might incur. The price of AppleCare+, which must be purchased within 60 days of a device’s initial purchase, range from $50 when buying an iPad to $100 for buying an iPhone 6S.

Maldonado alleges she received a refurbished device in May 2015, but was not told she would receive a refurbished device as a replacement. According to the lawsuit, this goes against the terms of AppleCare+, which state that customers will receive “a device that was new or equivalent to new in performance …”

The issue the lawsuit raises concerns how “new” and “refurbished” are defined. The complaint alleged that replacements are not “equivalent to new” because “refurbished devices can never be the equivalent to new in performance …”

“‘New’ means a Device that has never been utilized or previously sold and consists of all new parts,” reads the lawsuit. “The word ‘refurbished’ appears only once in the AppleCare+ terms and conditions even though the printed booklet is 33 pages long. The word is not even used to reference a device, but a part.”

Because of the nature of the lawsuit, since the action was brought on behalf of customers who bought an AppleCare or AppleCare+ plan for their iPhone, iPad, or iPod Touch after July 11, 2011, an Apple loss means all of those customers, including Maldonado and McRight, will receive some sort of compensation. Both defendants also seek an injunction prohibiting Apple from sending out refurbished devices as replacements, along with changes to the AppleCare+ terms and conditions, and the ability for customers to receive the full purchase price of a damaged device.

Editors' Recommendations

I tried replacing my $4,000 camera with the Galaxy S23 Ultra and iPhone 14 Pro
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra. and iPhone 14 Pro.

The smartphone-versus-DSLR camera debate divides opinions rather sharply, and for good reason. Each has its own set of benefits and drawbacks. However, unless you’re doing photography for professional reasons, the phone in your hands is an extremely powerful imaging tool that can run circles around a DSLR or mirrorless camera.

I’ve been exploring the foothills of the Himalayas for the past few weeks and decided to take along Samsung and Apple’s best smartphones, instead of carrying a professional DSLR camera with me (one that, in total, costs around $4,000). My travel-logging companions have been the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra and the iPhone 14 Pro. I’ve been blown away by what these smartphone cameras can accomplish, and the dramatic upper hand they hold over your average DSLR camera in a healthy bunch of scenarios.
Night mode is the magic mode

Read more
Your Google One plan just got 2 big security updates to keep you safe online
Two Google Pixel 7 Pro smartphones.

Google just added some major new security features to keep its Google One subscribers safe while on the web. After all, the internet is where you spend a lot of your time, whether that's looking things up, paying bills, shopping, booking appointments, or sharing photos with family and friends. That’s a lot of information, and Google wants to keep subscribers safe from the darker side of the web.

Regardless of whether you use an iPhone or an Android smartphone, all Google One subscribers are getting the following two security features.
VPN by Google One for everyone

Read more
How the iPhone became the most boring phone you can buy in 2023
iPhone 14 Pro Max in the middle with Galaxy S23 Ultra on the left and Honor Magic 5 Pro on the right.

It says a lot about a phone when the most-talked thing about its next iteration is its new volume buttons. That’s what the Apple iPhone is in 2023. It doesn’t fold, it doesn’t have a periscope zoom lens, it doesn’t fast charge, the design has been the same for years, it’s uncomfortable to hold, and its cameras are no longer the best — something proved most recently in our Galaxy S23 Ultra and iPhone 14 Pro camera test.

In the past few years, iPhones haven’t seen any kind of big new innovation. The Dynamic Island had the potential to be the innovation we'd been waiting for, but that hasn't come to fruition. When you add all that together, it makes the iPhone the most boring phone you can buy in 2023. Here’s why.
The iPhone has a folding problem

Read more