Skip to main content

Hated cell phone unlocking ban may be lifted by FCC

The contentious cell phone unlocking ban that went into effect this year may be on the ropes.

The Obama administration filed a petition (pdf) with the Federal Communications Commission on Tuesday, asking the agency to create new rules that would allow cell phone users to unlock their handsets once their carrier contracts expire. If approved, wireless carriers would be required by law to unlock customers’ devices.

Recommended Videos

The petition, formally filed by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), requires that wireless carriers unlock devices that are paid in full, allowing users to move their device to another carrier. If enacted, the new FCC rules would also allow those who buy secondhand devices to unlock them via the original carrier. The unlocking ban would also be lifted for both cell phones and tablets that are locked to a specific carrier.

Currently, the law mandates that wireless customers may only unlock their devices with permission from the carrier. If a person unlocks a device without carrier permission, he or she would be in violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DCMA), which protects the software used by carriers to lock devices to their networks.

NTIA argues in the petition that allowing customers to unlock the devices they own would “increase competition,” and “plainly promote the public interest.”

The Librarian of Congress, which issues new rules every three years to allow for exemptions to the DMCA, decided to remove cell phone unlocking from the list of approved practices last year, where it sat since 2006. As of January, unlocking a device without wireless carrier approval has carried a potential maximum sentence of five years in prison and a $2,500 fine per violation.

The NTIA petition is the first concrete pushback by the Obama administration, which publicly opposed the cell phone unlocking ban in March following a successful “We The People” petition against the ban that received 114,000 signatures.

Sina Khanifar, an entrepreneur turned digital rights activist who launched the White House petition, says the NTIA petition is an important first step toward restoring consumer rights.

“This is a pretty significant move: the NTIA petitions to the FCC are relatively rare, happening only once every few years,” said Khanifar in an email to Digital Trends. “Not only may this trigger action by the FCC, but it also shows that the administration is committed to making cell phone unlocking legal and accessible for consumers.”

Khanifar adds that, even if the petition successfully lifts the ban, it does not solve all the problems. Older devices and those produced by smaller manufacturers may not be easily unlocked due to out-of-date or incomplete databases of unlock codes. Further, says Khanifar, the new rules would not require wireless carriers to unlock devices in a timely manner. “For example, AT&T takes up to two weeks to unlock an iPhone,” says Kahnifar. “For many customers who might be traveling abroad or consumers who’ve bought devices second hand, that can make the unlock procedure ineffective.”

Khanifar says further legislation is needed to meet the needs of all customers. A bill (pdf) from Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) that would meet most of these demands, the “Unlocking Consumer Choice and Wireless Competition Act,” is currently moving though the House of Representatives.

The CTIA, which represents the wireless industry, supports the Goodlatte bill, but offered opaque opposition to the NTIA petition, warning in a statement that allowing for “bulk unlocking” may “harm consumers and facilitate the sale of stolen smartphones.”

Customers, meanwhile, appear undeterred by the unlocking ban. Reports from earlier this year found that cell phone unlocking in the U.S. had jumped 70 percent since the ban went into effect.

Andrew Couts
Features Editor for Digital Trends, Andrew Couts covers a wide swath of consumer technology topics, with particular focus on…
Nothing Phone 3 is the firm’s biggest swing at Apple and Samsung yet
Is this the shot-in-the-arm the smartphone market desperately needs?
A person holding the Nothing Phone 2, with the lights active.

The Nothing Phone 3 will officially be available in the US, as the company looks to take on the likes of the iPhone 16, Samsung Galaxy S25 and Google Pixel 9 with a handset Nothing founder and CEO, Carl Pei, calls its "first true flagship smartphone".

Those looking for an alternative smartphone option this year will be able to pick up the Phone 3 from Amazon and Nothing's own website, reports TechCrunch.

Read more
This one iPadOS 26 feature has me excited for the iPhone Fold
Semi-open state of a foldable iPhone concept

Samsung is set to launch the seventh generation of its Galaxy Z Fold book-style folding phone this Summer, but its biggest rival is yet to show its folding phone hand. Apple has long been expected to unveil an iPhone Fold, and the latest rumors suggest that it will launch next year.

I’ve used almost every folding phone released globally, with some exceptions for extremely obscure ones. While I've always been curious what an iPhone Fold would look like, I was fairly certain that Apple shouldn't build it, as I wasn’t sure they could deliver on one necessary feature.

Read more
These are the 4 best alternatives to the Google Pixel 9a
A person taking the Google Pixel 9a out of a pocket.

The best cheap phone race has been reignited by the Google Pixel 9a, which brings the Google Pixel 9 series experience at a significantly lower price. Starting at $449, Google’s latest Pixel offers the flagship processor of its siblings for flagship-level performance, an excellent camera, and long-term software support.

Yet, Google’s software experience won’t be for everyone; there are obvious tradeoffs in the specs sheet to enable the low price; the camera bar design is somewhat polarizing for long-term fans, and there’s no telephoto camera. 

Read more