Skip to main content

Jury tells Samsung to pay $119.6 million to Apple for patent infringement

Decided within a San Jose court earlier today, a jury in California just awarded Apple a judgement of $119.6 million from Samsung for infringing on patents related to the development of new smartphones. Specifically, the jury members believe that Samsung directly infringed on Apple’s “quick links” patent in all Samsung mobile devices. That particular patent is related to links embedded within text and the process that occurs when the user interacts with those links. In fact, the bulk of the damages were awarded for Samsung use of “quick links” on the S3 smartphone, approximately $52 million of the overall total.

In addition, the jury found that Samsung infringed on Apple’s “slide to unlock” patent on the Samsung’s Admire, Galaxy Nexus and Stratosphere. However, the jury ruled that Samsung didn’t not infringe on that patent when it came to the Samsung Galaxy S2, Galaxy S2 Epic 4G Touch and the Galaxy S2 Skyrocket. However, the jury also found that Samsung infringed on Apple’s “autocorrect” patent on all Samsung devices.

Recommended Videos

Interestingly, the jury ruled that Samsung did not infringe on Apple’s “universal search” patent or Apple’s “background sync” patent. Conversely, they also found that Apple was infringing on Samsung’s video transmission patents by offering FaceTime video calling to users. However, the penalty for this infringement was much smaller in comparison to the other monetary award. Basically, Apple has to pay Samsung a sum of $158,400 for the infringement or perhaps just reduce the overall award to Apple down to $119.44 million.

apple-vs-samsung-fight
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Of course, $119.6 million is just a minor portion of the $2.2 billion that Apple was originally seeking for the patent infringement. Approximately five percent of the original figure, some analysts are calling this a win for Samsung, in that the total figure was far less than what Apple originally wanted. It’s also likely that Apple spent tens of millions on legal fees, thus diluting the monetary judgement even more. Alternatively, Samsung was seeking 6 million for patent infringement related to the video transmission patents. 

Releasing a statement about the decision, an Apple representative said “We are grateful to the jury and the court for their service. Today’s ruling reinforces what courts around the world have already found: that Samsung willfully stole our ideas and copied our products. We are fighting to defend the hard work that goes into beloved products like the iPhone, which our employees devote their lives to designing and delivering for our customers.” Samsung has not released a statement about the decision at the time of publication of this article.

Today’s judgement hasn’t completely brought the trial to an end though. The jury will be meeting again on Monday to determine other damages related to the Samsung Galaxy S2. Based on today’s ruling, that could increase the overall award for Apple. According to trial coverage, the jury is comprised of a former business executive at IBM, an assistant at Seagate, an employee of the Los Gatos police department, another executive assistant, a former teacher and a property manager. Before reaching the verdict, the jury deliberated for three days. Prior to that, this trial lasted about four weeks. 

Mike Flacy
By day, I'm the content and social media manager for High-Def Digest, Steve's Digicams and The CheckOut on Ben's Bargains…
Apple iPhone 16 vs. Samsung Galaxy S24: Is one better than the other?
iPhone 16 vs. Galaxy S24.

Apple recently released the iPhone 16, almost nine months after Samsung unveiled the Galaxy S24 series. Although these phones are similar in many ways and are the cheapest in their flagship ranges, they run on different operating systems. How do these two phones compare in other aspects? Is one better than the other? Which one is the superior choice based on your preferences?

Let's compare the two phones and find out which one suits you better.
Apple iPhone 16 vs. Samsung Galaxy S24: specs

Read more
Both the Apple Watch 9 and Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 are on sale
Apps page on the Samsung Galaxy Watch 6.

Amazon has some great smartwatch deals right now, encompassing two obvious options for both iPhone and Android phone owners. Right now, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 for $230 instead of $330 -- $100 saving. Alternatively, the Apple Watch Series 9 is also $100 off, down to $299 from $399. If all that sounds great to you, hit the buttons below to immediately buy, or you can keep reading while we take you through what you need to know about each watch. Count on both deals ending pretty soon.

Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 -- $230, was $330

Read more
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra vs. Apple Watch Ultra 2: Which one is the best?
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra with black band and Apple Watch Ultra with orange band against a gradient blue background.

This year, Samsung has taken its wearables to an impressive new level with the new Galaxy Watch Ultra, a smartwatch that’s inevitably drawing comparisons to its biggest rival, the Apple Watch Ultra 2.

From the name to the design, it’s apparent that this is precisely what Samsung was going for. However, it’s unfair to call the Galaxy Watch Ultra merely a copycat product. There are also some ways in which Samsung has put its unique spin on the new extreme wearable, and it’s certainly a much better fit for the needs of outdoor adventure enthusiasts than 2022’s Galaxy Watch 5 Pro, which was a decent smartwatch that suffered from a bit of an identity crisis.

Read more