Skip to main content

God’s Creatures review: an overly restrained Irish drama

From its chaotic, underwater first frame all way to its liberating, sun-soaked final shot, God’s Creatures is full of carefully composed images. There’s never a moment across the film’s modest 94-minute runtime in which it feels like co-directors Saela Davis and Anna Rose Holmer aren’t in full control of what’s happening on-screen. Throughout much of God’s Creatures’ quietly stomach-churning second act, that sense of directorial control just further heightens the tension that lurks beneath the surface of the film’s story.

In God’s Creatures‘ third act, however, Holmer and Davis’ steady grip becomes a stranglehold, one that threatens to choke all the drama and suspense out of the story they’re attempting to tell. Moments that should come across as either powerful punches to the gut or overwhelming instances of emotional relief are so underplayed that they are robbed of much of their weight. God’s Creatures, therefore, ultimately becomes an interesting case study on artistic restraint, and, specifically, how too calculated a style can, if executed incorrectly, leave a film feeling unsuitably cold.

Paul Mescal stands outside a house with Emily Watson in God's Creatures.
Courtesy of A24

To its credit, God’s Creatures’ detached style isn’t entirely misplaced. The film’s coldly removed approach not only suits the windy, hard-edged Irish village in which it’s set, but it also reflects the understated, reserved way that so many of its residents prefer to carry on with their lives. That includes Aileen O’Hara (Emily Watson), a well-respected mother who runs the floor at her village’s local fishing depot. Between her estranged relationship with her son, Brian (Paul Mescal), and the constant care that her disabled father, Paddy (Lalor Roddy), requires, there’s already plenty weighing Aileen down when God’s Creatures begins.

You wouldn’t know that at first, though, because Aileen does her best to keep her emotional baggage hidden. It’s only during certain instances of quiet contemplation that the weight of Aileen’s trauma becomes apparent, but those moments become increasingly more common once Mescal’s Brian makes a surprise return to his hometown after spending a number of years abroad. His return triggers Aileen’s most maternal, self-destructive impulses, which take the form of gestures that put her own life at risk in favor of improving Brian’s.

The limits of Aileen’s love for her son are tested, however, when Brian is suddenly accused of raping Sarah Murphy (Aisling Franciosi), a young girl in town that he used to date. When Aileen is called into the local police station out of nowhere in the middle of the night, she is asked to corroborate an alibi for Brian that she knows isn’t true. While she initially does so without hesitation as well, the repercussions of her decision quickly begin to take a toll not only on her but the entirety of the Irish town that she calls home.

Emily Watson stands in a crowd in A24's God's Creatures.
A24, 2022

The fallout of Brian’s violent act against Sarah gradually unfolds over the course of God’s Creatures‘ patient second half, which follows Aileen as she becomes increasingly uncertain about whether or not she made the right decision in protecting her son. That doubt, which steadily eats away at her, manifests itself as a series of silent gazes that only become increasingly guilt-ridden the closer Aileen gets to God’s Creatures’ surprisingly brutal finale.

Had Aileen been played by anyone other than Emily Watson, the film’s third act, which rests the weight of its story entirely on her character’s shoulders, likely would have fallen completely flat. Fortunately, Watson remains one of our most intelligent, commanding performers, and in God’s Creatures, she beautifully navigates the conflicting emotions that are raging within Aileen for much of the film’s second half. Opposite her, Mescal (soon to be seen in another A24 drama, Aftersun) turns in a deceptively understated, quietly unsettling performance as Brian, Aileen’s entitled son.

While she isn’t given as much time to explore her character as Watson and Mescal are, either, Aisling Franciosi also gives a vulnerable, movingly dignified performance as Sarah, the woman at the center of God’s Creatures’ plot. Together, Franciosi, Mescal, and Watson bring the necessary gravity to God’s Creatures that its stiflingly restrained screenplay doesn’t. The three actors are not, however, capable of totally lifting God’s Creatures up to the heights that it could have reached had it been allowed to be a bit more emotionally direct or forthright.

Paul Mescal lights a cigarette in A24's God's Creatures.
A24, 2022

Behind the camera, Holmer and Davis bring as much directorial sophistication to God’s Creatures as they can, delivering shots that are both deceptively simple and visually layered. In one of the film’s more ingenious visual moments, Holmer and Davis even place Watson in the center of their frame only to have her lean out of view at the exact moment that Mescal’s Brian enters the pub door behind her. The image is the result of several incredibly well-timed physical movements as well as Holmer and Davis’ keen eye for blocking, which allows them to place Watson directly in the same line of sight as the door that Mescal eventually walks through.

That said, it’s not Brian’s surprise barroom entrance in God’s Creatures’ first act that feels the most emblematic of the film’s strengths and weaknesses. That honor, instead, goes to the film’s opening moments, which see Holmer and Davis transition from several handheld, unwieldy underwater images to one long, far away shot of the sea. The film’s initial handheld shots are, notably, accompanied by the visceral screams of someone drowning, but by the time Holmer and Davis have moved on to their long shot of the sea, their victim’s muffled screams have been replaced by silence.

God’s Creatures | Official Trailer HD | A24

These opening minutes perfectly encapsulate the film itself, which contains more than its fair share of gripping and intense scenes but frequently chooses to place itself at an emotional distance that doesn’t suit the story it’s telling. For that reason, it doesn’t come as much of a surprise when God’s Creatures makes the odd last-minute decision to turn its focus away from Aileen just when her emotional journey has begun to reach its thorniest and most compelling places. In the end, this is a film that will always choose a distant, unmoving shot of the sea over the submerged perspectives of its characters, and that’s why God’s Creatures ultimately fails to dive as deeply as it should.

God’s Creatures hits theaters and VOD on Friday, September 30.

Editors' Recommendations

Pearl review: a star is born (and is very, very bloody)
Mia Goth stares at the camera in the poster for Pearl.

Pearl is a candy-coated piece of rotten fruit. The film, which is director Ti West’s prequel to this year's X, trades in the desaturated look and 1970s seediness of its parent film for a lurid, Douglas Sirk-inspired aesthetic that seems, at first, to exist incongruently with its story of intense violence and horror. But much like its titular protagonist, whose youthful beauty and Southern lilt masks the monster within, there’s a poison lurking beneath Pearl’s vibrant colors and seemingly untarnished Depression-era America setting.

Set around 60 years before X, West’s new prequel does away with the por nstars, abandoned farms, and eerie old folks that made its predecessor’s horror influences clear and replaces them with poor farmers, charming film projectionists, and young women with big dreams. Despite those differences, Pearl still feels like a natural follow-up to X. The latter film, with its use of split screens and well-placed needle drops, offered a surprisingly dark rumination on the horror of old age. Pearl, meanwhile, explores the loss of innocence and, in specific, the often terrifying truths that remain after one’s dreams have been unceremoniously ripped away from them.

Read more
The Woman King review: a thrilling period epic
Viola Davis holds a torch in The Woman King.

The Woman King opens purposefully and violently. The film’s first sequence, which brings to life a brutal battle from its sudden beginning all the way to its somber end, is a master class in visual storytelling. Not only does it allow director Gina Prince-Bythewood to, once again, prove her worth as a capable action filmmaker, but it also introduces The Woman King’s central all-female army, sets up the film’s core conflict, and introduces nearly every important character that you’ll need to know for the two hours that follow it. The fact that The Woman King does all of this within the span of a few short minutes just makes its opening sequence all the more impressive.

The level of impressive craftsmanship in The Woman King’s memorably violent prologue is present throughout the entirety of its 135-minute runtime. For that reason, the film often feels like a throwback to an era that seems to reside farther in the past than it actually does, one when it was common for all the major Hollywood studios to regularly put out historical epics that were, if nothing else, reliably well-made and dramatically engaging.

Read more
See How They Run review: a charming but slight whodunit
Sam Rockwell and Saoirse Ronan lean in to inspect something together in See How They Run.

The opening narration of See How They Run, which comes courtesy of Adrien Brody’s ill-fated Leo Köpernick, doesn’t just tell you what kind of movie it is. Brody’s sardonic voice-over also makes it clear that See How They Run knows exactly what kind of a story it’s telling, and so do its characters. As Köpernick is killed by an unknown assailant in See How They Run’s prologue, Brody’s voice even dryly remarks: “I should have seen this coming. It’s always the most unlikable character that gets killed first.”

In a less charming film, See How They Run’s streak of self-aware comedy would wear thin quickly. However, the new film from director Tom George is able to, for the most part, strike the right balance between tongue-in-cheek humor, mystery, and genuine sweetness. The film is a lean, not-particularly-mean whodunit, one that lacks the acidic strain of humor present in some of cinema’s other great murder mysteries, including 2019’s Knives Out, but which still boasts the kind of playful spirit that is at the heart of so many of its notable genre predecessors.

Read more