Skip to main content

10 years ago, the most underrated version of Batman hit the small screen

David Mazouz in Gotham
Fox

A young orphan watches his parents die, becomes traumatized, and works on his issues by embracing his fears and adopting a costumed identity to fight crime in his morally bankrupt and corrupt city, Gotham. We all know the tale, and we’ve seen it countless times on the big and small screens. However, amid the many Batman movies and TV shows over the years, especially those in the live-action realm, one stands out because of how refreshing and surprisingly insightful it is.

Fox’s Gotham premiered 10 years ago, in September 2014, on the Fox network, and while it didn’t necessarily revolutionize Batman’s origin story, it did recontextualize it. Presenting a new take on Bruce Wayne’s early years in the inter between his parents’ murders and his decision to become Batman, Gotham shined a light on this crucial and formative yet tragically ignored period in the future hero’s life. At first sight, it could be easy to discard Gotham as another origin story born during the TV superhero boom of the 2010s. However, upon closer examination, one can easily see it as a truly original and quite daring version of Batman’s youth that remains criminally underrated, even when it’s arguably the most inspired adaptation of the character we had in the last decade.

Recommended Videos

Bruce steps into the spotlight

Sean Pertwee and David Mazouz as Alfred and Bruce Wayne at a party in the TV show Gotham.
Fox

One of the main issues modern Batman adaptations have is a distinct lack of understanding of who the character is. The idea that “Bruce is the mask and Batman is the real version,” popularized directly after Christopher Nolan’s game-changing Dark Knight trilogy, took over the character’s lore, with many treating it as gospel. However, that’s just a basic misread of who the Caped Crusader is, and while the approach was valid and fit with Nolan’s hyper-realistic take, it’s not who Batman is or, more importantly, who he should be. And yet, adaptations post-Nolan, from Zack Snyder’s misguided take on the DCEU to Matt Reeves’ crime noir in 2022’s The Batman, have actively sidelined Bruce in favor of showcasing Batman.

It’s not an either-or situation, something sadly few adaptations understand. This basic understanding is what separates Gotham from other versions of the Caped Crusader. The show focuses exclusively on Bruce Wayne — indeed, Batman doesn’t appear at all, save for a brief glimpse at his back during the last scene of the last episode. This approach doesn’t take away from the action or make the narrative less compelling; quite the opposite, in fact. David Mazouz is one of the best versions of Bruce Wayne we’ve ever seen. Starting the show at 13, Mazouz takes Bruce on a typical coming-of-age journey, albeit one infested with crime and a constant struggle to deal with the grief and trauma of watching his parents die before him.

Bruce Wayne looks at a photo in Gotham.
Warner Bros.

Adding a coming-of-age twist to Bruce Wayne’s storyline is such a stroke of genius that it’s frankly shocking no one thought of doing it before. Mazouz looks his age and acts it, playing Bruce with a palpable mix of typical teen angst, enduring trauma and regret, and, as the series progresses, cocky confidence born from being a literal billionaire. He’s likable and easy to root for while also being slightly annoying and often frustrating, as a typical teenager is.

Seeing Bruce Wayne, usually a larger-than-life, elusive figure portrayed in such a simple and, dare I say it, approachable manner was far more refreshing than anything Nolan, Snyder, or Reeves did in their respective universes. It was a true reinterpretation of a familiar character, an insightful new way to look at a figure who many of us thought we knew inside and out.

Bruce and Selina talk in Gotham.
Warner Bros.

Gotham‘s greatest strength is treating Bruce Wayne as a human being first and a superhero second. Like the all-time best adaptation of Batman, the masterful Mask of the PhantasmGotham uses its setting and narrative approach to explore Bruce’s rich and often contradictory psyche.

His inner turmoil takes center stage, showed through his most crucial relationships with the future commissioner James Gordon (Ben McKenzie), his trusted butler and surrogate father, Alfred (Sean Pertwee), and his on-again-off-again love interest, Selina Kyle (Camren Bicondova). By watching the aftermath of the decisive moment of Bruce’s life, Gotham recontextualizes the world’s greatest detective, adding layers to his already complex characterization and making him a richer, more engaging and fascinating character.

Embracing the color

Bruce and Jerome in a hall of mirrors in "Gotham."
Fox

Recently, the upcoming Max show The Penguin made headlines when the title character’s name was changed from the comic’s accurate Oswald Cobblepot to the duller Oz Cobb. The change, according to producer Dylan Clark, was born from a desire to give the character a more “grounded” tone; in their eyes, “Oz Cobb” was more “believable” and thus better. There’s no rule that says a comic book adaptation needs to be 100% accurate or treat the source material as gospel, but there’s something instantly recognizable here, a distinct embarrassment at being based on a comic book property. The word “grounded” has very much become a way for Hollywood to get rid of the sillier and campier aspects of a superhero in an attempt to legitimize the character as a “serious” IP.

This issue is especially prevalent in Batman adaptations. Nolan’s Dark Knight trilogy proved superhero movies could be taken seriously by the industry, receiving Oscar nominations and even winning some statuettes, including a posthumous victory for the late Heath Ledger’s all-time great villain. It’s a valid approach, and creators are entitled to make the adaptation they want to make. However, there’s something so lame in trying to make a character who purposely exists in the fantastical more realistic and duller. Nolan, Snyder, and Reeves all tried it, with varying degrees of success, to the point where this more “grounded” version is Batman’s new normal.

The Penguin and Riddler look ahead in Gotham.
Warner Bros.

Now, Gotham wasn’t exactly “camp” in the way the 1966 show was. However, it wasn’t the hyper-realistic, violent version desperate to be seen as “real,” either. Instead, it walked a delicate line between comic book-y flamboyance and police procedural with a healthy dose of teen angst. Take the show’s version of Oswald Cobblepot, played by the criminally underrated Robin Lord Taylor. In Gotham, Penguin is a medium figure in the city’s criminal underworld, much like he is in The Batman. However, Gotham embraces the eccentricities and stylish flairs that make Penguin… well, Penguin.

From a penchant for carrying umbrellas to a broken leg that never healed and left him walking with a limp, Gotham‘s Penguin is true to his comic book counterpart. Yet, Taylor’s performance is so detailed, so layered and lived-in that the character never seems exaggerated or unreal. In fact, Taylor’s Penguin is among Gotham‘s most evocative figures, an ambitious and manipulative man who climbs his way through the city’s criminal ladder through sheer force of will.

The Riddler points his gun in Gotham.
Warner Bros.

The same can be said for Gotham‘s version of iconic Batman rogues like Edward Nigma, played by a spectacular Cory Michael Smith, and the Valeska Brothers, the show’s take on the Joker, played by an outstanding and unhinged Cameron Monaghan. Gotham never shies away from the source material’s more foolish aspects; instead, it embraces them, seamlessly incorporating them into its world-building. The truth is, comic books and the superheroes that inhabit them are inherently silly, and that’s OK.

In fact, that’s one of the key aspects of Batman’s story: he is the outlier in a world populated by freaks and creeps, not because he isn’t those things — he is the biggest freak of them all — but because he chooses to oppose them in an effort to make sense of the chaos. The world is a madhouse, but Batman isn’t the warden — he is the patient who recognizes his delusion and uses it to keep everyone in check.

‘I’m an idea, a philosophy’

A man comforts a child in Gotham.
Warner Bros.

Gotham is pretty much everything a great Batman adaptation should be. It delivered the best Bruce Wayne since Mask of the Phantasm and proved that Batman doesn’t need to be opposed to his natural campiness in the realm of live action. Moreover, it arguably produced the best and most detailed Gotham City we’ve ever seen. From the numerous crime families and gangs vying for control to the many, many, many deranged individuals living in a perpetual state of arrested development, Gotham presented the ultimate version of the titular city, one that was equal parts alluring and off-putting, an alluring cautionary tale where the darkness came from within.

Few adaptations have such an understanding of their source material. Yet, for multiple reasons, Gotham was never a major hit. Sure, a large part of that came from the fact it aired on Fox during the last days of network TV before the rise of streaming. However, part of its status as an underappreciated gem comes from the looming shadow of Nolan’s and, now, Reeves’ Batman. But the entertainment landscape is big enough for multiple versions of Batman, especially when it’s as inspired and clever as Gotham.

A promo image for Gotham.
Warner Bros.

For any fan of Batman or comic books themselves, Gotham is a must-watch. However, even those with a passing regard for the genre will find something to enjoy here. It doesn’t necessarily have something for everyone — it’s actually catered toward a specific audience that both enjoys and, more importantly, appreciates comic book storytelling — but it does have a unique, assured, and unabashedly self-aware voice. And in a television landscape where shows must be distinctive to the point of singularity, Gotham is truly one of a kind.

All 5 seasons of Gotham are available to stream on Max.

David Caballero
David is a Mexican freelance writer with a deep appreciation for words. After three years in the cold world of Marketing…
10 years later, is The Dark Knight Rises a bad film or simply misunderstood?
Christian Bale as Bruce Wayne in The Dark Knight Rises

This year marks the 10th anniversary of Christopher Nolan's The Dark Knight Rises, a film best remembered as an underwhelming follow-up to a genuinely masterful sequel than as a worthy entry in its own trilogy. It must be difficult to act as the next chapter to what is, objectively speaking, the best superhero film in Hollywood history. Indeed, The Dark Knight's standing and legacy are too grand and meaningful, the closest thing to legendary that modern filmmaking has approached. Could any film compete with it?

Now, to be fair, The Dark Knight Rises is not a terrible movie. On the contrary, Rises is a tense, action-packed, grand spectacle that lives up to the much-maligned and often bastardized term "summer blockbuster." But in the context of Nolan's filmography, and especially his two Batman films that came before it, the film can't help but feel underwhelming. Rises is fascinating because it had everything it needed to succeed, from great source material (Knightfall is one of Batman's classic modern stories) to talented actors like Tom Hardy, Anne Hathaway, and Marion Cotillard breathing new life into old characters. The elements to make a fantastic, career-defining movie are all there, so why is it so disappointing and, worse, unmemorable? And why did it take so long for everyone to accept the fact that it's not as good as it should be?
Bruce Wayne at his worst

Read more
The Batman: The movies and comics that inspired the hit film
Split image of Robert De Niro in Taxi Driver, Robert Pattinson in THe Batman, & Jake Gyllenhaal in Zodiac.

Note: Spoilers for The Batman are discussed in this article.

Following the turbulent opening phase of the DCEU, director Matt Reeves was given the massive task of helming the third incarnation of DC's Caped Crusader within the last 10 years. Christopher Nolan's Dark Knight trilogy set a high bar for how Batman could be shaped in live-action theatrical endeavors, but The Batman needed to be much more than going back to those fundamentals. For that, Reeves and co-writer Peter Craig needed to draw on several sources of inspiration to make Robert Pattinson's hero resonate with a 2022 audience numbed from relentless reboots and sequels. Thankfully, they did just that and then some by looking toward the gritty crime-noir thrillers of director David Fincher and the comic book source materials that make Batman the "World's Greatest Detective."

Read more
Gladiator 2: release date, cast, plot, trailer, and more
A man points his sword in Gladiator II.

In 2000, director Ridley Scott introduced Maximus Decimus Meridius to the world in Gladiator. The historical epic starred Russell Crowe as Maximus, a Roman general sold into slavery after being betrayed by Commodus (Joaquin Phoenix), the Emperor's power-hungry son. Maximus becomes a gladiator and vows to exact his revenge on Commodus for killing his family. Gladiator was the second-highest-grossing film of 2000 and won five Oscars, including Best Picture and Best Actor for Crowe.

Twenty-four years later, Scott returns to the arena of blood and sand with his long-awaited sequel, Gladiator 2. The film will follow an adult Lucius Verus, son of Lucilla and nephew of Commodus. Gladiator 2 is one of the most anticipated films on the 2024 calendar. Below, we explore everything you need to know about Gladiator 2, including the release date, cast, synopsis, and trailer.
When is Gladiator 2's release date?

Read more