Skip to main content

‘Snowden’ review

Oliver Stone directed 'Snowden,' but Joseph Gordon-Levitt brings him to life

It says a lot about the effect Edward Snowden has had on the world that even amid the wild fervor of the current U.S. presidential election, he remains one of the most controversial figures in American society, more than three years after the incident that made him a household name.

A former government intelligence analyst and contractor who became one of the modern era’s most famous whistleblowers, Snowden is simultaneously a hero, villain, patriot, or traitor depending on who you ask. This makes him the sort of character that isn’t easy to translate to the big screen, and demands a tremendously skilled filmmaker and talented actor in order to do so in a way that’s both dramatic and authentic.

Fortunately, Snowden has both of these things in director Oliver Stone and lead actor Joseph Gordon-Levitt, and the result is an impressive – if occasionally too glossy – film that manages to find the compelling story that lies beneath a sea of raw data and public policy.

Snowden finds the compelling story that lies beneath a sea of raw data and public policy.

Written and directed by Stone, Snowden is based on Russian attorney Anatoly Kucherena’s novel Time of the Octopus, which chronicles his time working with Snowden in Russia, as well as Luke Harding’s novel The Snowden Files: The Inside Story of the World’s Most Wanted Man. The film casts Looper and Inception actor Joseph Gordon-Levitt as the title character, and covers his life and career leading up to and following his decision to leak restricted files concerning the American government’s surveillance of its citizens.

Snowden is far from a perfect film, but Gordon-Levitt deserves little – if any – blame for the movie’s flaws. The former television actor has come a long way since his days on the small screen, and his portrayal of Snowden may be one of his best performances to date.

Throughout the film, Gordon-Levitt finds the sweet spot between humanizing someone who many people have only seen in photos or on computer monitors and straying into an over-sentimentalized caricature of a familiar (if somewhat distant) figure. Make no mistake: Even with Stone behind the camera, it’s Gordon-Levitt’s performance that makes Snowden fascinating.

Gordon-Levitt’s supporting cast is a mixed bag, with Divergent franchise star Shailene Woodley providing a fine (if somewhat forgettable) portrayal of Snowden’s free-spirited girlfriend, Lindsay Mills, and Nicolas Cage doing the expected amount of scene-chewing as a pioneering CIA engineer condemned to a forgotten classroom.

It’s actor Rhys Ifans who stands out, however, in the role of Snowden’s former mentor at the CIA.

It would be all too easy to make Ifans’ character the villain of the story, and at times – particularly in one memorable scene that has Snowden communicating with Ifans’ character via an oversized video-conference projection – he comes perilously close to slipping into full-on bad guy. Fortunately, Ifans and Stone seem well aware of the nuance his character demands if they want him to remain a believable, real-world figure, and the movie is better for it.

Where Snowden falters is in its efforts to make its title character’s story feel somehow complete.

It’s [Joseph] Gordon-Levitt’s performance that makes Snowden fascinating.

In its efforts to create a narrative with a beginning, middle, and end, Snowden feels like it takes the easy way around some of the more complicated issues involved in its subject’s actions, and occasionally glosses over some of those issues entirely.

It’s clear that Stone is on Snowden’s side, but the film feels light on its exploration of the factors – justified or otherwise – that contributed to government surveillance reaching the levels that compelled Snowden to do what he did. The audience is simply presented with a bad situation that appears to be getting worse, and a reluctant hero who risks everything for the greater good.

For all the nuance that Gordon-Levitt and Ifans channel in their performances, there’s precious little of it to be found in the story, which occasionally feels heavy-handed in the way it hammers home a heroic filter on Snowden and his actions.

Snowden movie
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Still, Stone succeeds in making a complicated story rooted in philosophical and legal quandaries very digestible – which is no easy feat, given all of the technical jargon it demands.

Although Snowden wraps up too neatly in the end – possibly due to the still-evolving nature of its subject’s story in the real world (he’s still considered a traitor by the U.S. government and forced to live in Russia) – it also manages to seem increasingly relevant in the modern political climate. It leans heavily on its cast in order to push through the complex story it wants to tell, and they prove themselves more than capable of seeing it through to a satisfying conclusion that exists on the screen, if not in the real world.

If you think Snowden is a hero, Stone’s film will certainly validate your beliefs. If you think he’s a traitor, there’s little chance that his story – as it’s presented in Snowden – is going to convince you otherwise. But if you’re in search of a better understanding of Snowden himself, what he did, and why he’s such a controversial figure, Snowden offers all of that, along with some fantastic, memorable performances by its cast.

Editors' Recommendations

Rick Marshall
A veteran journalist with more than two decades of experience covering local and national news, arts and entertainment, and…
Operation Seawolf review: nice Nazis? No thanks!
Dolph Lundgren holds onto a pipe inside a U-Boat in a scene from Operation Seawolf.

At a time when anti-Semitic extremists are storming the U.S Capitol, running for office, and declaring war on Jewish people via social media, it might not be the best time for a movie that expects you to sympathize with Nazis. And yet, that hasn't stopped Operation Seawolf from sailing into theaters and on-demand streaming services this month.

The film, which follows the crew of a German U-boat during the waning days of World War II, casts Dolph Lundgren (Rocky IV) as German war hero Capt. Hans Kessler, who's ordered to lead the Nazis' remaining U-boats on a desperate (and likely fatal) mission to attack the U.S. on its own soil. As he and his crew make their way toward New York City in one final bid to turn the tide of war, Kessler finds himself struggling with both the internal politics of the ship and his own sense of duty as the Third Reich crumbles around him.

Read more
Conversations with A Killer: The Jeffrey Dahmer Tapes review: killer’s words yield little insight
A superimposed image of Jeffrey Dahmer in Conversations with a Killer.

It’s spooky season this month, and that means the atrocity mine is currently being plundered by content creators across America. The three-episode docuseries Conversations with a Killer: The Jeffrey Dahmer Tapes, directed by noted documentarian Joe Berlinger (Brother's Keeper, Paradise Lost), is Netflix’s second project tackling the infamous cannibal/necrophiliac/serial killer to debut in a matter of weeks. It follows Ryan Murphy’s 10-hour miniseries drama, Dahmer-Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story. This Dahmer double dose mirrors the barrage of Ted Bundy content that Netflix put out in early 2019, following up the Zac Efron-led drama Extremely Wicked, Shockingly Evil and Vile with the docuseries Conversations with a Killer: The Ted Bundy Tapes (also directed by Berlinger). 

As was the case with Bundy, Netflix is convinced that a multipronged examination of Dahmer could lead to a better understanding of his psychology and motivations, teaching viewers warning signs or expanding our capacity for empathy. Or maybe they recognize that people are addicted to unspeakable tragedies and will do anything they can to maximize viewers’ compulsion for true crime? Attempting to satisfy on all accounts, The Dahmer Tapes oscillates uneasily between character study, social commentary, and pure shock value, landing somewhere in between all three.
In Dahmer's own words

Read more
Amsterdam review: An exhausting, overlong conspiracy thriller
Christian Bale, Margot Robbie, and John David Washington walk through a lobby together in Amsterdam.

Amsterdam could have been forgiven for being a lot of things, but dull is not one of them. The new film from writer-director David O. Russell boasts one of the most impressive ensemble casts of the year and is photographed by Emmanuel Lubezki, one of Hollywood’s premier cinematographers. Beyond that, its kooky premise and even wackier cast of characters open the door for Amsterdam to be the kind of screwball murder mystery that O. Russell, at the very least, seems uniquely well-equipped to make.

Instead, Amsterdam is a disaster of the highest order. It’s a film made up of so many disparate, incongruent parts that it becomes clear very early on in its 134-minute runtime that no one involved — O. Russell most of all — really knew what it is they were making. It is a misfire of epic proportions, a comedic conspiracy thriller that is written like a haphazard screwball comedy but paced like a meandering detective drama. Every element seems to be at odds with another, resulting in a film that is rarely funny but consistently irritating.

Read more