Skip to main content

Writing with Fire review: Nevertheless, they persist

Independent journalism is threatened in many areas of the world right now, and during these difficult times, journalists’ experiences can occasionally make for stories as captivating as the topics they report on. That’s particularly true for the staff of Khabar Lahariya, India’s women-run news outlet that’s the subject of the Oscar-nominated documentary Writing with Fire.

An "Oscars Week" badge on an image.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Directed by Sushmit Ghosh and Rintu Thomas, Writing with Fire is the first feature-length Indian documentary to be nominated for an Academy Award, and follows the editorial team at Khabar Lahariya as they transition from 14 years of print publication to the digital medium. The film chronicles the experiences of several women on the outlet’s editorial team, largely of India’s oppressed Dalit caste, as they use smartphones, determination, and compassion to shed light on scandals and speak truth to power.

In depicting the staff of Khabar Lahariya’s struggles, Writing with Fire offers audiences a look at a world that might seem strange to those unfamiliar with India’s rigid caste system and unique sociopolitical environment, but it also delivers plenty of familiar frustrations, too. The challenges faced by women journalists — particularly in patriarchal environments — are widespread and well documented, for example. The same can be said for the difficulty many news outlets have faced in transitioning to an increasingly online, digital audience.

Both issues factor heavily into the uphill battle waged by the journalists of Khabar Lahariya as they journey from remote villages to crowded cities in pursuit of the truth.

A woman records an interview with an iPhone in a scene from Writing With Fire.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

While those elements set the stage for the film’s narrative, Writing with Fire also depicts how the aforementioned issues (and countless others) are amplified by India’s massive wealth disparity and a caste system that relegates a large portion of the population — including the bulk of Khabar Lahariya’s reporters — to an ignored, “untouchable” social and economic class. That the women of Khabar Lahariya are able to attain the level of access and reach they achieve is a testament to their perseverance and courage — something Writing with Fire makes clear time and time again throughout its swift 92-minute running time.

As the film indicates, training and equipping a team of reporters with iPhones in order to record videos of public events and interviews might seem simple enough. However, when many of the communities they report on (and for some, their own homes) don’t have electricity, the logistical dilemmas they face quickly become clear.

Two women discuss how to use an iPhone in a scene from Writing With Fire.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Despite the events in Writing with Fire taking place a world away from many audiences, the film does a wonderful job of finding the familiar in the reporters’ shared experiences. They report on deadly mining accidents, local law enforcement’s dismissal of sexual assault cases, and the rise of Hindu nationalism in the country’s politics, but corporate greed, government corruption, and aggressive nationalism aren’t problems unique to India. The same can be said for many of the problems the women face in the film, whether they’re dealing with difficult public officials or casual misogyny.

Writing with Fire could have easily delivered a detached observation of Khabar Lahariya and the women of its groundbreaking editorial team, but the film’s directors find just the right balance of narratives to keep it both fascinatingly foreign and familiar in equal measures. In doing so, they ensure the film has as much to tell us about the women on the front lines of journalism in India as it does about the world just outside our doors.

Sushmit Ghosh and Rintu Thomas’ Writing with Fire is nominated for an Oscar at the Academy Awards ceremony on March 27, and will have its television debut on March 28 on PBS.

Editors' Recommendations

Rick Marshall
A veteran journalist with more than two decades of experience covering local and national news, arts and entertainment, and…
Blonde review: a striking and tough Marilyn Monroe biopic
Ana de Armas smiles while wearing a billowing white dress in Blonde.

Andrew Dominik’s Blonde opens, quite fittingly, with the flashing of bulbs. In several brief, twinkling moments, we see a rush of images: cameras flashing, spotlights whirring to life, men roaring with excitement (or anger — sometimes it’s hard to tell the difference), and at the center of it all is her, Marilyn Monroe (played by Ana de Armas), striking her most iconic pose as a gust of wind blows up her white dress. It’s an opening that makes sense for a film about a fictionalized version of Monroe’s life, one that firmly roots the viewer in the world and space of a movie star. But to focus only on de Armas’ Marilyn is to miss the point of Blonde’s opening moments.

As the rest of Dominik’s bold, imperfect film proves, Blonde is not just about the recreation of iconic moments, nor is it solely about the making of Monroe’s greatest career highlights. It is, instead, about exposure and, in specific, the act of exposing yourself — for art, for fame, for love — and the ways in which the world often reacts to such raw vulnerability. In the case of Blonde, we're shown how a world of men took advantage of Monroe’s vulnerability by attempting to control her image and downplay her talent.

Read more
Meet Cute review: Peacock’s time travel rom-com falls flat
Kaley Cuoco stands next to Pete Davidson in Peacock's Meet Cute.

Meet Cute wants to be a lot of things at once. The film, which premieres exclusively on Peacock this week, is simultaneously a manic time travel adventure, playful romantic comedy, and dead-serious commentary on the messiness of romantic relationships. If that sounds like a lot for one low-budget rom-com to juggle — and within the span of 89 minutes, no less — that’s because it is. Thanks to the performance given by its game lead star, though, there are moments when Meet Cute comes close to pulling off its unique tonal gambit.

Unfortunately, the film’s attempts to blend screwball comedy with open-hearted romanticism often come across as hackneyed rather than inspired. Behind the camera, director Alex Lehmann fails to bring Meet Cute’s disparate emotional and comedic elements together, and the movie ultimately lacks the tonal control that it needs to be able to discuss serious topics like depression in the same sequence that it throws out, say, a series of slapstick costume gags.  The resulting film is one that isn't memorably absurd so much as it is mildly irritating.

Read more
Confess, Fletch review: Jon Hamm charms in crime comedy reboot
Jon Hamm holds a drink in a scene from Confess, Fletch.

Murder mysteries with a sense of humor are back in vogue lately, with projects like Knives Out, Death on the Nile, and Only Murders in the Building enjoying success as their protagonists -- sometimes brilliant, sometimes bumbling -- navigate cases crowded with colorful suspects. Given all of that positive buzz, you don't need a trail of clues to deduce why Confess, Fletch is reintroducing audiences to Irwin "Fletch" Fletcher, novelist Gregory Mcdonald's snarky, crime-solving investigative journalist.

Directed by Greg Mottola (Superbad, Adventureland) from a script he co-wrote with Zev Borow, and based on Mcdonald's 1976 novel of the same name, Confess, Fletch casts Jon Hamm as the titular tenacious reporter, who finds himself embroiled in yet another murder while investigating an international art theft. Hamm takes over the role from Chevy Chase, who portrayed Fletcher in the 1985 film Fletch and its 1989 sequel, Fletch Lives.

Read more