Skip to main content

Bezos doesn’t deny Amazon used third-party seller data

Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos was finally questioned more than two hours into the Big Tech hearing about using third-party seller data to inform its own products — and Bezos didn’t deny it.

U.S. Representative Pramila Jayapal (D-WA), questioned Bezos about reports that Amazon employees access third-party seller data to directly compete with its own products. Jayapal asked Bezos if Amazon accesses third-party seller data, but Bezos replied he couldn’t give a “yes or no” answer and that they were investigating those reports.

U.S. Rep. Pramila Jayapa
House of Representatives

Bezos’ appearance at the hearing was largely due to a Wall Street Journal investigation that uncovered the alleged use of third-party data. That report contradicted statements made by Amazon representatives during a hearing last year, and spurred Congress to demand Bezos appear before lawmakers.

Recommended Videos

Jayapal said a former Amazon employee told the committee that data from third-party sellers “is like a candy shop…anyone can have access to anything they want.”

“We have a policy against using seller-specific data to aid our private business but I can’t guarantee you that the policy has never been violated,” Bezos said. “If we found that someone violated it, we would take action against them.”

Jayapal said that the committee is concerned that Amazon monitoring this third-party data would hinder the smaller businesses Amazon claims to help.

“If you’re continuously monitoring the data, then they’re never gonna get big enough to compete with you,” she said. Jayapal also grilled Bezos for its policies for third-party sellers which she claimed Amazon was not itself compelled to follow.

“You can set the rules of the game for your competitors but not have to follow them yourself,” she said.

Bezos replied that Amazon was “proud” of its work with third-party sellers.

Later, Rep. Lucy McBath raised the concerns of a third-party bookseller, who claimed her business was delisted after she began competing against Amazon’s own book sales.

“What do you have to say to the small businesses who are talking to Congress because you’re not listening to them?” McBath said.

Bezos denied that Amazon systematically used its power to crush third-party sellers.

“That is not how we operate the business,” he said.

Allison Matyus
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Allison Matyus is a general news reporter at Digital Trends. She covers any and all tech news, including issues around social…
This modular Pebble and Apple Watch underdog just smashed funding goals
UNA Watch

Both the Pebble Watch and Apple Watch are due some fierce competition as a new modular brand, UNA, is gaining some serous backing and excitement.

The UNA Watch is the creation of a Scottish company that wants to give everyone modular control of smartwatch upgrades and repairs.

Read more
Tesla, Warner Bros. dodge some claims in ‘Blade Runner 2049’ lawsuit, copyright battle continues
Tesla Cybercab at night

Tesla and Warner Bros. scored a partial legal victory as a federal judge dismissed several claims in a lawsuit filed by Alcon Entertainment, a production company behind the 2017 sci-fi movie Blade Runner 2049, Reuters reports.
The lawsuit accused the two companies of using imagery from the film to promote Tesla’s autonomous Cybercab vehicle at an event hosted by Tesla CEO Elon Musk at Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) Studios in Hollywood in October of last year.
U.S. District Judge George Wu indicated he was inclined to dismiss Alcon’s allegations that Tesla and Warner Bros. violated trademark law, according to Reuters. Specifically, the judge said Musk only referenced the original Blade Runner movie at the event, and noted that Tesla and Alcon are not competitors.
"Tesla and Musk are looking to sell cars," Reuters quoted Wu as saying. "Plaintiff is plainly not in that line of business."
Wu also dismissed most of Alcon's claims against Warner Bros., the distributor of the Blade Runner franchise.
However, the judge allowed Alcon to continue its copyright infringement claims against Tesla for its alleged use of AI-generated images mimicking scenes from Blade Runner 2049 without permission.
Alcan says that just hours before the Cybercab event, it had turned down a request from Tesla and WBD to use “an icononic still image” from the movie.
In the lawsuit, Alcon explained its decision by saying that “any prudent brand considering any Tesla partnership has to take Musk’s massively amplified, highly politicized, capricious and arbitrary behavior, which sometimes veers into hate speech, into account.”
Alcon further said it did not want Blade Runner 2049 “to be affiliated with Musk, Tesla, or any Musk company, for all of these reasons.”
But according to Alcon, Tesla went ahead with feeding images from Blade Runner 2049 into an AI image generator to yield a still image that appeared on screen for 10 seconds during the Cybercab event. With the image featured in the background, Musk directly referenced Blade Runner.
Alcon also said that Musk’s reference to Blade Runner 2049 was not a coincidence as the movie features a “strikingly designed, artificially intelligent, fully autonomous car.”

Read more
Apple TV+ just got a price slash that’s tough to resist, and it won’t last long
The Apple TV main screen.

Apple has just quietly announced that it will be slashing the price on its Apple TV+ offering for a limited time deal.

While Apple prices the service at a standard $9.99 per month usually, it has just cut that way down to $2.99 per month.

Read more