Skip to main content

Digital rights group Fight for the Future wants to ban facial recognition

A digital rights group wants to completely ban the government from using facial recognition surveillance software.

Fight for the Future’s new campaign, announced Tuesday, includes the website, which asks visitors to contact lawmakers about the issue. The website states, “Facial recognition surveillance technology is unreliable, biased, and a threat to basic rights and safety.” 

The website points to reports that have shown that 98% of the time, facial recognition programs identify the wrong person. A Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) study also found that facial analysis software is more likely to misidentify people of color, more specifically women of color.

Evan Greer, the Deputy Director of Fight for the Future told Digital Trends that errors like these have dire consequences. 

“A facial recognition error could land an innocent person in prison,” she said. 

Greer said the group is calling for a complete ban rather than a regulation of facial recognition surveillance because of the fundamental issues with facial recognition. 

“The industry would like to avoid this debate entirely by focusing on regulation and cautious implementation — we need to be discussing whether technology this dangerous has any role in a free and open society,” she said. 

The group’s call to action against facial recognition comes on the heels of a new report by the Washington Post that the FBI and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) are using facial recognition on Americans’ state drivers license photos without their consent. The report states that the FBI has logged more than 390,000 facial-recognition searches since 2011, using federal and local databases, as well as state DMV databases. 

Politicians have also voiced their opinions on the issue since the report came out. Both Democrats and Republicans — including Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) — agree that facial recognition use poses a threat to civil liberties. 

Cities like San Francisco and Sommerville, Mass. have already banned the use of facial recognition from police and public agencies. 

Facial recognition software is nothing new, but as the technology becomes more advanced, its use has become more widespread outside of just unlocking our smartphones. 

Greer said that Fight for the Future is only focusing on law enforcement and government use of facial recognition surveillance, but that other uses could also prove to have problems. 

“We think that private uses should be scrutinized as well, especially since that biometric data can often be accessed by law enforcement,” she said. 

Digital Trends reached out to ICE and the FBI, and ICE has provided the following statement:

“Due to law-enforcement sensitivities, ICE will not comment on investigative techniques, tactics, or tools. During the course of an investigation, ICE has the ability to collaborate with external local, federal, and international agencies to obtain information that may assist in case completion and prosecution efforts. This is an established procedure that is consistent with other law-enforcement agencies.”

Editors' Recommendations

Allison Matyus
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Allison Matyus is a general news reporter at Digital Trends. She covers any and all tech news, including issues around social…
Amazon bans police from using facial recognition tech Rekognition for 1 year
Amazon Logo

Amazon has barred police from using its facial recognition technology for one year.

In a company blog post Wednesday, Amazon said it will implement a one-year "moratorium on police use of Amazon’s facial recognition technology" -- known as Rekognition.

Read more
IBM will no longer develop or research facial recognition tech
IBM's Summit Supercomputer

IBM CEO Arvind Krishna says the company will no longer develop or offer general-purpose facial recognition or analysis software. In a June 8 letter addressed to Congress and written in support of the Justice in Policing Act of 2020, Krishna advocates for new reforms that support the responsible use of technology -- and combat systematic racial injustice and police misconduct.

“IBM firmly opposes and will not condone uses of any technology, including facial recognition technology offered by other vendors, for mass surveillance, racial profiling, violations of basic human rights and freedoms, or any purpose which is not consistent with our values and Principles of Trust and Transparency,” wrote Krishna in the letter.

Read more
‘Dazzle’ makeup won’t trick facial recognition. Here’s what experts say will
martymoment CV dazzle

As demonstrators protest against racism and police brutality, some have suggested that extravagant makeup can block facial recognition technology they worry have been deployed by authorities.

But the creator of this “CV Dazzle” makeup style said the patterns, which were designed to fool an older method of facial detection, won't trick more sophisticated algorithms — though he and other experts said protesters can take steps to evade detection.

Read more