Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. News

Libra Lite? Facebook Pay is the social network’s latest foray into finance

Allison Matyus
By

Facebook just introduced a new payment system called Facebook Pay that would be accessible with Facebook, Instagram, Facebook Messenger, and WhatsApp. The new payment system debuts amid controversy on Facebook’s proposed cryptocurrency known as Libra. 

Facebook Pay is meant to make in-app purchases, transfer payments from person to person, and make purchases on select Facebook pages or businesses, as well as on Facebook Marketplace. All major credit cards are supported by Facebook Pay, as well as PayPal and Stripe. 

Recommended Videos

“Facebook Pay is part of our ongoing work to make commerce more convenient, accessible and secure for people on our apps. And in doing so, we believe we can help businesses grow and empower people everywhere to buy and sell things online,” Deborah Liu, the vice president of Marketplace and Commerce at Facebook, wrote in Tuesday’s blog post announcing Facebook Pay. “We’ll continue to develop Facebook Pay and look for ways to make it even more valuable for people on our apps.”

Related

One of the main criticisms of Facebook’s proposed Libra system is privacy issues since the social media network had its fair share of those in the past. However, Facebook laid out the security that went into Facebook Pay. 

“We designed Facebook Pay to securely store and encrypt your card and bank account numbers, perform anti-fraud monitoring on our systems to detect unauthorized activity and provide notifications for account activity. You can also add a PIN or use your device biometrics, such as touch or face ID recognition, for an extra layer of security when sending money or making a payment. Facebook does not receive or store your device’s biometric information,” the post reads. 

Facebook Pay is currently only available on Facebook and Facebook Messenger, and WhatsApp and Instagram will be added later on. Once it’s available on WhatsApp and Instagram, you won’t need a Facebook account to use Facebook Pay. 

While Facebook said in its announcement that the two payment systems are entirely separate, Facebook Pay could very well be the precursor to Libra. There’s been a bipartisan consensus that Facebook having a currency is a bad idea, with both Republicans and Democrats attacking the plan since its inception in the summer.

Beyond lawmakers, many of Libra’s initial partners appear uncertain about the cryptocurrency’s chances. In October, PayPal decided to end its participation in the Libra Association following regulatory scrutiny from lawmakers in both the U.S. and Europe. Visa, Mastercard, eBay, Stripe, and Argentine e-commerce giant Mercado Pago all pulled out of the project shortly after that.

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg testified before Congress last month about Libra, defending the idea but acknowledging the struggles left to overcome. 

“I understand we’re not the ideal messenger right now. We’ve faced a lot of issues over the past few years, and I’m sure people wish it was anyone but Facebook putting this idea forward,” he said in his testimony.

Editors' Recommendations

Topics
Allison Matyus
Allison Matyus
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Allison Matyus is a general news reporter at Digital Trends. She covers any and all tech news, including issues around social…
Here’s yet another sign that Facebook’s Libra is never going to happen
Facebook Libra

When Facebook unveiled the idea for its Libra cryptocurrency in June, the project had some major backers from the traditional financial industry, including Visa, Mastercard, PayPal, and more. Now it looks like those key partners are getting cold feet in light of major scrutiny from financial regulators around the world.

Visa, Mastercard, and other organizations that initially signed on to create and maintain Libra are now "reconsidering their involvement" in the cryptocurrency, according to a report Tuesday from the Wall Street Journal.

Read more
Here’s yet another reason why Facebook’s Libra might never happen
episode 154 facebook project libra particpants 1200x675

Some of the early backers of Facebook’s Libra are looking to distance themselves from the cryptocurrency project.
According to The Financial Times, at least three of the project’s founding backers are concerned about the regulatory spotlight on the project and are considering discontinuing their support over concerns that their involvement will draw the attention of agencies that regulate their businesses.
Facebook released a white paper in June explaining its plans for Libra. It describes the cryptocurrency as a way for payments to be processed seamlessly across all 1.7 billion people in the world, a universal currency of sorts.
There are currently 28 founding members of the Libra Association including Visa, Mastercard, Uber, and Spotify.
The currency is already getting a good deal of scrutiny from politicians, and European Union antitrust officials have opened an official investigation into the project. In early July, President Donald Trump attacked Libra via Twitter.
“I am not a fan of Bitcoin and other Cryptocurrencies, which are not money, and whose value is highly volatile and based on thin air,” Trump tweeted. “Unregulated Crypto Assets can facilitate  unlawful behavior, including drug trade and other illegal activity.”

Trump wrote “Facebook Libra’s ‘virtual currency’ will have little standing or dependability. If Facebook and other companies want to become a bank, they must seek a new Banking Charter and become subject to all Banking Regulations, but like other Banks, National and International.”

Read more
In SEC filing, Facebook admits Libra cryptocurrency may not happen after all
Facebook Libra

Facebook’s drive to create its own worldwide cryptocurrency might have hit a brick wall. The company said that Libra’s planned 2020 launch might be delayed – or it might not ever happen at all.

In a quarterly update filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) last week, Facebook warned investors that “market acceptance of such currency is subject to significant uncertainty.”

Read more