Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. Health & Fitness
  4. News

Google’s A.I. can now detect breast cancer more accurately than doctors can

Add as a preferred source on Google
 

Google’s artificial intelligence technology is able to spot signs of breast cancer in women with more accuracy than doctors, according to a new study. 

Recommended Videos

The study, published on Wednesday, January 1, in the scientific journal Nature, found that by using A.I. technology, there was a reduction in false positives and false negatives when it came to diagnosing forms of breast cancer.

A.I. technology was used to look the mammograms from more than 15,000 women in the United States, and over 76,000 women in the United Kingdom. The program was able to reduce false positive by 5.7% for women in the U.S. and 1.2% for those in the U.K. False negatives were reduced 9.4% in the U.S. and by 2.7% in the U.K. 

The advanced A.I. system proved to be more accurate than human experts with knowledge of a patient’s history, even if doctors did a second reading of mammogram results, according to the study. 

“The performance of even the best clinicians leaves room for improvement,” the study reads. “A.I. may be uniquely poised to help with this challenge.”

The study was a collaboration between Google Health, Northwestern University, Cancer Research U.K. Imperial Centre, and Royal Surrey County Hospital. 

“Looking forward to future applications, there are some promising signs that the model could potentially increase the accuracy and efficiency of screening programs, as well as reduce wait times and stress for patients,” wrote Google Health’s Technical Lead, Shravya Shetty and Product Manager, Daniel Tse, in a blog post announcing the initial findings. 

The use of A.I. technology to better detect screenings could be groundbreaking, considering that one in eight U.S. women will develop breast cancer in their lifetime, according to the American Cancer Society. 

Aside from health applications, Google’s A.I. technology is also being applied for identifying different species of animals in a new wildlife conservation program that aims to better protect and monitor animals throughout the world. 

The ultimate goal for the data is to identify different species of animals faster. According to the blog, human experts can look through 300 to about 1,000 images per hour, but Google’s A.I. technology can analyze 3.6 million photos an hour and automatically classify an animal. 

Allison Matyus
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Allison Matyus is a general news reporter at Digital Trends. She covers any and all tech news, including issues around social…
You can now generate images with Gemini’s memory without paying a dime
Study guide created by Gemini

Google has made one of Gemini's most interesting AI tricks a lot easier to try. The company is rolling out its personalized image generation feature to eligible U.S. users for free, removing a paywall that previously kept it exclusive to Gemini's paid tiers.

Powered by Google's Nano Banana image model, the feature does more than generate pretty pictures; it taps into Gemini's understanding of you, making AI-generated images feel surprisingly personal.

Read more
Meta’s Brain2Qwerty v2 turns thoughts into text, and it doesn’t need brain implants
The latest AI model decodes brain signals into coherent sentences using external scanners.
Meta Brain2Qwerty v2 Featured

Artificial intelligence is getting surprisingly good at understanding humans. Now, Meta wants it to understand our brains too. The company has unveiled Brain2Qwerty v2, an upgraded AI system that can translate brain activity into full sentences, all without requiring brain implants or surgery. The goal isn't mind reading for the masses. Instead, it's to help people who have lost the ability to speak communicate again.

How a Brain-powered keyboard works

Read more
AI chatbots can often feed into your delusions. Researchers say you should look for three signs
Experts warn that chatbot design choices can reinforce unhealthy beliefs in vulnerable users.
ChatGPT on a smartphone

Artificial intelligence chatbots have become incredibly good at sounding human. But a new review paper by psychiatrist Marc Augustin and fellow researchers Thomas A. Pollak and Helen Morrin, published in NPP—Digital Psychiatry and Neuroscience, argues that existing AI research points to an overlooked psychological risk. The paper, highlighted by The Wall Street Journal, reviews previous studies and proposes a framework explaining how three common chatbot behaviors can combine to reinforce delusional thinking in vulnerable users, creating what the authors call an "amplification spiral."

Researchers say these are the three warning signs

Read more