Skip to main content

Kamala Harris is Biden’s VP selection, and that may be good news for Big Tech

 

Presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden announced Tuesday that Sen. Kamala Harris (D-California) is his running mate. After nearly four years as a senator from California and six years as that state’s attorney general, Harris has plenty of experience with Silicon Valley, and that history could inform the tech policies of a Biden (or even future Harris) administration. If the past is any indication, Harris’ ascension may be a win for Big Tech.

Recommended Videos

Where does Harris stand on antitrust?

During her 2020 presidential campaign, Harris criticized tech companies like Facebook for abusing user data, although she didn’t go as far as candidates like Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Massachusetts) in calling for the breakup of big tech.

Sen. @KamalaHarris: "Facebook has experienced massive growth and has prioritized its growth over the best interests of its consumers."

"We need to seriously take a look" at breaking up Facebook, "it is essentially a utility that has gone unregulated." #CNNSOTU pic.twitter.com/ywbJk6gxvC

— State of the Union (@CNNSOTU) May 12, 2019

Speaking to CNN in May 2019, Harris said that “Facebook has experienced massive growth and has prioritized its growth over the best interests of its consumers, especially on the issue of privacy,” adding that “there needs to be serious regulation … There needs to be more oversight.”

Harris went on to describe Facebook as “essentially a utility,” pointing out that very few people in modern society can operate in their communities or careers without using Facebook at some point.

When asked specifically if these companies should be broken up, Harris said, “I think we have to seriously take a look at that.”

In 2019, when the New York Times asked then-candidate Harris if big tech companies like Facebook, Amazon, and Google should be broken up, Harris said, “I believe that the tech companies have got to be regulated in a way that we can ensure, and the American consumer can be certain, that their privacy is not being compromised.”

When the interviewer pressed her to clarify whether that would mean reducing the sizes of companies, Harris dodged, reiterating that her “first priority is going to be that we ensure that privacy is something that is intact, and that consumers have the power to make decisions about what happens with their personal information and that it is not being made for them.”

Despite her criticisms of Facebook, Harris did not try to wrangle Big Tech in antitrust matters. As Chapman University’s Joel Kotkin writes: “As California’s attorney general, she did little to prevent the agglomeration of economic power that has increasingly turned California into a semi-feudal state dominated by a handful of large tech firms.”

It’s a sentiment echoed by Consumer Watchdog President Jamie Court, who told MarketWatch that Harris “oversaw the growth of the biggest sector in America that dominates our privacy and our choices, and didn’t file a single case to take on that power.”

Privacy has long been a focus for Harris

As attorney general of California, Harris made consumer privacy a focus of her work. In 2012, she got the companies that dominate the apps market (such as Amazon and Apple) to agree to allow consumers to review an app’s privacy policy before downloading it, rather than after.

Harris has also taken an assertive stance against “revenge porn” sites (where people post nude photos or videos of individuals without their consent). Harris launched an investigation of the revenge porn site ugotposted.com, which led to the site’s operator, Kevin Bollaert, being sentenced to 18 years in prison. Harris’ office touted the case as “the first criminal prosecution of a cyber-exploitation website operator in the country.”

In 2016, when the FBI was calling for Apple to give it access to a locked phone used by the San Bernadino shooter, Harris declined to take a side.

During a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing in 2018, Harris pressed Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg on the company’s control of consumer data and whether Facebook was doing enough to protect that data.

How does Silicon Valley view Harris?

Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg praised Harris’ selection, calling it “a huge moment for Black women and girls all over the world – and for all of us.”

According to the Center for Economic and Policy Research’s Revolving Door Project, Harris’ donors include executives from Facebook, Amazon, Apple,. Google, Oracle, and others. In the past, Harris has also received support from executives like Sean Parker (Napster, Facebook) Marc Benioff (Salesforce), and Marissa Mayer (Yahoo).

In 2018, Harris delivered the keynote address at the State of the Valley conference in San Jose, California.

Overall, Harris is a popular figure among the Silicon Valley elite, and her record suggests that while she will likely push for better consumer privacy protections, she might not be a Big Tech trust buster.

Will Nicol
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Will Nicol is a Senior Writer at Digital Trends. He covers a variety of subjects, particularly emerging technologies, movies…
Google just gave vision to AI, but it’s still not available for everyone
Gemini Live App on the Galaxy S25 Ultra broadcast to a TV showing the Gemini app with the camera feature open

Google has just officially announced the roll out of a powerful Gemini AI feature that means the intelligence can now see.

This started in March as Google began to show off Gemini Live, but it's now become more widely available.

Read more
This modular Pebble and Apple Watch underdog just smashed funding goals
UNA Watch

Both the Pebble Watch and Apple Watch are due some fierce competition as a new modular brand, UNA, is gaining some serous backing and excitement.

The UNA Watch is the creation of a Scottish company that wants to give everyone modular control of smartwatch upgrades and repairs.

Read more
Tesla, Warner Bros. dodge some claims in ‘Blade Runner 2049’ lawsuit, copyright battle continues
Tesla Cybercab at night

Tesla and Warner Bros. scored a partial legal victory as a federal judge dismissed several claims in a lawsuit filed by Alcon Entertainment, a production company behind the 2017 sci-fi movie Blade Runner 2049, Reuters reports.
The lawsuit accused the two companies of using imagery from the film to promote Tesla’s autonomous Cybercab vehicle at an event hosted by Tesla CEO Elon Musk at Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) Studios in Hollywood in October of last year.
U.S. District Judge George Wu indicated he was inclined to dismiss Alcon’s allegations that Tesla and Warner Bros. violated trademark law, according to Reuters. Specifically, the judge said Musk only referenced the original Blade Runner movie at the event, and noted that Tesla and Alcon are not competitors.
"Tesla and Musk are looking to sell cars," Reuters quoted Wu as saying. "Plaintiff is plainly not in that line of business."
Wu also dismissed most of Alcon's claims against Warner Bros., the distributor of the Blade Runner franchise.
However, the judge allowed Alcon to continue its copyright infringement claims against Tesla for its alleged use of AI-generated images mimicking scenes from Blade Runner 2049 without permission.
Alcan says that just hours before the Cybercab event, it had turned down a request from Tesla and WBD to use “an icononic still image” from the movie.
In the lawsuit, Alcon explained its decision by saying that “any prudent brand considering any Tesla partnership has to take Musk’s massively amplified, highly politicized, capricious and arbitrary behavior, which sometimes veers into hate speech, into account.”
Alcon further said it did not want Blade Runner 2049 “to be affiliated with Musk, Tesla, or any Musk company, for all of these reasons.”
But according to Alcon, Tesla went ahead with feeding images from Blade Runner 2049 into an AI image generator to yield a still image that appeared on screen for 10 seconds during the Cybercab event. With the image featured in the background, Musk directly referenced Blade Runner.
Alcon also said that Musk’s reference to Blade Runner 2049 was not a coincidence as the movie features a “strikingly designed, artificially intelligent, fully autonomous car.”

Read more