Skip to main content

Tesla ditches a feature many owners didn’t even know they had

Tesla boss Elon Musk said this week that the automaker ditched the lumbar support feature on the front passenger seat of the Model 3 and Model Y because vehicle logs revealed that it was hardly used.

“Logs showed almost no usage,” Musk tweeted in response to a follower who was complaining about Tesla’s recent price hikes, adding, “Not worth cost/mass for everyone when almost never used.”

Recommended Videos

However, even the briefest of online searches uncover plenty of comments that indicate the feature, which is designed to improve comfort via subtle seat adjustments, was rarely used because few people knew about it.

The person behind the Drive Tesla account on Twitter, for example, admitted last year that it took a while to realize what the button on the side of the seat was actually for.

I’m not ashamed to admit I only discovered this week that this is the lumbar support. What feature did you only discover weeks or months after owning your #Tesla? pic.twitter.com/pA0aZKiW8g

— Drive Tesla 🇨🇦 (@DriveTeslaca) February 27, 2020

In a Tesla forum, another driver wrote, “LOL I have had my TM3 almost 5 months and until I found this thread I didn’t know I had lumbar adjustments.”

On a separate Tesla-focused site, an owner said simply, “We have lumbar buttons?!?”

Some posts about the feature suggest people may have stopped using it after finding that it provided little improvement to comfort. Other drivers, meanwhile, complained that it was hard to operate, with one poster saying they found the controls “finicky,” adding that they “don’t always seem to be working.”

Offering a succinct summary of the situation, a commenter on a YouTube video about the feature’s removal wrote, “Amazing how many people are losing their sh*t over something that they’ve got to go out to their car to see if they even have it or not!”

Responding to Musk’s tweet about the removal of lumbar support from the Model 3 and Model Y vehicles, some Tesla owners had an alternative suggestion about why it’s hardly used, explaining that once you’ve set it to your liking, there’s rarely a need to adjust it — though it’s worth noting that the driver’s seat is keeping the feature.

Of course, features in the passenger seat will always be used less than those on the driver’s side because the seat is occupied less frequently, though it’s not clear if Tesla took this into consideration. Whatever the truth about precisely why passengers skipped using lumbar support, Tesla has decided to remove it anyway, leaving riders to use the regular seat buttons to adjust the seat to their liking.

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
Google just gave vision to AI, but it’s still not available for everyone
Gemini Live App on the Galaxy S25 Ultra broadcast to a TV showing the Gemini app with the camera feature open

Google has just officially announced the roll out of a powerful Gemini AI feature that means the intelligence can now see.

This started in March as Google began to show off Gemini Live, but it's now become more widely available.

Read more
This modular Pebble and Apple Watch underdog just smashed funding goals
UNA Watch

Both the Pebble Watch and Apple Watch are due some fierce competition as a new modular brand, UNA, is gaining some serous backing and excitement.

The UNA Watch is the creation of a Scottish company that wants to give everyone modular control of smartwatch upgrades and repairs.

Read more
Tesla, Warner Bros. dodge some claims in ‘Blade Runner 2049’ lawsuit, copyright battle continues
Tesla Cybercab at night

Tesla and Warner Bros. scored a partial legal victory as a federal judge dismissed several claims in a lawsuit filed by Alcon Entertainment, a production company behind the 2017 sci-fi movie Blade Runner 2049, Reuters reports.
The lawsuit accused the two companies of using imagery from the film to promote Tesla’s autonomous Cybercab vehicle at an event hosted by Tesla CEO Elon Musk at Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) Studios in Hollywood in October of last year.
U.S. District Judge George Wu indicated he was inclined to dismiss Alcon’s allegations that Tesla and Warner Bros. violated trademark law, according to Reuters. Specifically, the judge said Musk only referenced the original Blade Runner movie at the event, and noted that Tesla and Alcon are not competitors.
"Tesla and Musk are looking to sell cars," Reuters quoted Wu as saying. "Plaintiff is plainly not in that line of business."
Wu also dismissed most of Alcon's claims against Warner Bros., the distributor of the Blade Runner franchise.
However, the judge allowed Alcon to continue its copyright infringement claims against Tesla for its alleged use of AI-generated images mimicking scenes from Blade Runner 2049 without permission.
Alcan says that just hours before the Cybercab event, it had turned down a request from Tesla and WBD to use “an icononic still image” from the movie.
In the lawsuit, Alcon explained its decision by saying that “any prudent brand considering any Tesla partnership has to take Musk’s massively amplified, highly politicized, capricious and arbitrary behavior, which sometimes veers into hate speech, into account.”
Alcon further said it did not want Blade Runner 2049 “to be affiliated with Musk, Tesla, or any Musk company, for all of these reasons.”
But according to Alcon, Tesla went ahead with feeding images from Blade Runner 2049 into an AI image generator to yield a still image that appeared on screen for 10 seconds during the Cybercab event. With the image featured in the background, Musk directly referenced Blade Runner.
Alcon also said that Musk’s reference to Blade Runner 2049 was not a coincidence as the movie features a “strikingly designed, artificially intelligent, fully autonomous car.”

Read more