Skip to main content

Another Facebook quiz could have stolen data under the guise of research

As Facebook begins notifying the potential 87 million users of the “breach of trust” on their data, Facebook is now banning more accounts over similar data harvesting allegations. The social giant has now banned another company, CubeYou, suspected of designing quizzes under the guise of academic studies only to sell the data to marketing companies. Facebook has also suspended another account from a company said to have helped build the tools used in the Cambridge Analytica scandal on grounds that the company could have also received some of that data.

Facebook suspended CubeYou accounts after investigative journalists told Facebook the company used similar tactics to access and use user data. According to CNBC, CubeYou allegedly labels quizzes as data for non-profit academic research, then uses or shares the data for marketing.

Facebook says that CubeYou accounts have been suspended until the company can complete an audit. CubeYou claims it did not deceive users with the data collected and that data was only collected when working with a Cambridge University study between 2013 and 2015. The university says that they didn’t work with the company on a psychological quiz but that CubeYou built an interface for a website. According to a statement from the university, the prediction models were developed by Cambridge University researchers and remained secret. 

According to the company’s website, CubeYou uses “social media statistics” along with studies and government surveys to “bring together the most robust consumer data sources available.” According to CNBC, the company claims they have more than 10 million “opted-in panelists.”

The company’s most popular app is You Are What You Like, a quiz that uses a Facebook user’s likes to guess that user’s personality. Another version of the same app is called Apply Magic Sauce. Both apps reportedly have app terms that state that the quiz is used for “non-exclusive access for research purposes only.”

Like the “thisisyourdigitallife” app, before Facebook changed the access in 2015, the app could have also accessed data from a friend list when one user allowed the app access to their account.

Facebook has also suspended accounts for AggregateIQ, a company that built some data tools for Cambridge Analytica. Like CubeYou, Facebook says they are conducting an investigation and that the company’s accounts have been suspended until that investigation can be completed. The Guardian suggested that because the two companies coordinated on several projects, that AggregateIQ could also have the data. AggregateIQ denies the connection and says it never saw the Facebook data from Cambridge Analytica.

In Mark Zuckerberg’s first statement after the scandal broke, Facebook’s CEO said that the company would be conducting an audit of apps that were allowed to access friend data before the app access changed in 2015. Last week, the company shared new limitations on how third-party apps can access data, along with stating that users will begin seeing a notification if they were affected on April 9.

Meanwhile, Zuckerberg is expected to meet with Congress on Tuesday, April 9. A number of different privacy groups have also come together to ask the company to globally implement the privacy changes that will soon be required in the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation.

Editors' Recommendations

Hillary K. Grigonis
Hillary never planned on becoming a photographer—and then she was handed a camera at her first writing job and she's been…
Sen. Ron Wyden wants to protect your data from Big Tech, if Congress lets him
U.S. Senator Ron Wyden speaks in Washington, D.C.

Sen. Ron Wyden is fed up with Big Tech companies getting slapped on the wrist for violating user privacy. Unfortunately, he doesn't think his fellow congressmen feel the same way. Yet.

"My sense is we are one major privacy scandal away from finally getting the political support to move this legislation,” the Oregon Democrat said in an exclusive interview with Digital Trends.

Read more
Documents show Facebook used user data as bargaining chip against competitors
mark zuckerberg speaking in front of giant digital lock

Leaked documents show that Facebook used user data as a bargaining chip with its advertising partners and leveraged the data against its competitors. 

NBC News first reported on the confidential documents in April that contained Facebook’s internal communications from 2011-2015 as part of an ongoing lawsuit. The newly leaked documents — about 7,000 pages in total — shed light on how CEO Mark Zuckerberg used users’ data as leverage for company partnerships.

Read more
Facebook has suspended ‘tens of thousands’ of apps over private data use
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg in Washington, D.C.

Facebook says it has suspended “tens of thousands” of apps suspected of misusing private user data amid an investigation that it began last year following the Cambridge Analytica scandal.
The social media giant promised in March 2018 to take a look at all of the apps on Facebook that had access to large amounts of user information prior to when it changed its policy in 2014. The resulting suspensions were announced in a blog post on Friday. The investigation began after right-wing political analytics firm Cambridge Analytica improperly mined data from 87 million Facebook users. 
"Our App Developer Investigation is by no means finished. But there is meaningful progress to report so far," Ime Archibong, Facebook's vice president of product partnerships, wrote in the blog post. "To date, this investigation has addressed millions of apps. Of those, tens of thousands have been suspended for a variety of reasons while we continue to investigate."
Facebook said that it initially selected apps for investigation based on their user numbers, as well as how much data they could access from user accounts. It has since broadened that investigation to include apps that it thinks have the potential to abuse its policies, a process that involves both a background investigation of the developer, as well as an analysis of the app’s activity on the platform.
The investigation, Archibong wrote, involved “hundreds of people: Attorneys, external investigators, data scientists, engineers, policy specialists, platform partners, and other teams across the company.” 
While Facebook says that it removed tens of thousands of apps, it notes that the suspended apps, while plentiful, were only created by roughly 400 developers. An app being suspended doesn’t mean that it was necessarily posing a threat to people, and many were still in their testing phase when they were suspended, so they were never readily available to Facebook’s wider user base.
Facebook says it is not unusual for developers to have multiple test apps that never get rolled out. In some cases, apps were suspended because the developer did not respond to a request for information from Facebook, not due to any actual policy violations. One app, myPersonality, apparently shared information with researchers and companies but refused to take part in Facebook's audit -- so it was banned
The post goes on to says that Facebook hasn’t confirmed any other instances of misuse to date other than those it has already revealed to the public and that it has taken legal action against a handful of apps for a number of different reasons.
Beyond the investigation, Facebook says it has “made widespread improvements to how we evaluate and set policies for all developers that build on our platforms.” It also removed a number of APIs and has increased the number of people that work on its investigations team in order to better handle them in the future.

Read more