Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. News

Meta just pulled its most controversial AI image generation feature days after launch

Meta is framing this as "hearing feedback," not as fixing a consent problem.

Add as a preferred source on Google
Instagram Muse Image
Meta

A couple of days ago, I covered Meta’s announcement of the Muse Image, an AI tool that lets users generate images based on someone’s Instagram profile without asking the account owner. 

I also highlighted the risks associated with it in another piece, along with steps for opting out. Three days later, the feature is no longer available. 

Statement from Meta:

Earlier this week, we announced that one way for people to generate images in Meta AI is by @-mentioning public Instagram accounts that they want to reference. Our intent was to provide a useful creative tool and to give people control over whether their…

— Dylan Byers (@DylanByers) July 10, 2026

What exactly happened there?

As more and more people picked up on Meta’s Muse Image and how it assumed you’re okay when someone else used your Instagram pictures as a reference for generating AI pictures, the tool started to face a massive backlash. 

Recommended Videos

Opt-out controls existed for users who wanted to protect their likeness, but the default was in, which meant millions of public Instagram users were enrolled in a system that could generate AI images of them without ever clicking anything to agree.

However, in a statement to Puck News’ Dylan Byers, Meta acknowledges that the feature “missed the mark” and is therefore “no longer available.”

What did Meta say about it?

“Earlier this week, we announced that one way for people to generate images in Meta AI is by @-mentioning public Instagram accounts that they want to reference,” says Meta in a statement to the outlet. 

“Our intent was to provide a useful creative tool and to give people control over whether their public content could be referenced in this way. We’ve heard the feedback that this feature missed the mark, so it’s no longer available.”

Byers highlights that the pushback from talent agencies, most notably CAA, one of the largest in the entertainment industry, could have played a major role in rolling the feature back. 

While I would have argued that turning it off by default for all Instagram accounts and allowing experimental users to opt in would have been the right approach, the feature is gone, and I beleive it’s for good. 

Shikhar Mehrotra
For more than five years, Shikhar has consistently simplified developments in the field of consumer tech and presented them…
X’s creator payouts are changing, and original content is the new currency
The platform is replacing Revenue Sharing with a program designed to reward creators who actually make something.
X Twitter on iPhone

X is changing the rules for creators yet again. This time, the platform wants to put less emphasis on simply generating engagement and more on actually making something original. X is replacing its controversial Creator Revenue Sharing program with a new initiative called Original Content Rewards, which will officially launch on September 8, 2026. The existing Revenue Sharing program will continue paying participating creators through September 7, after which the new system takes over.

X wants to reward creators, not engagement farmers

Read more
Snapchat’s Spotlight algorithm now favors human-made videos over AI-generated ones
Snapchat is taking a firm stance against AI slop.
Snapchat-App-Store-open-on-iPhone

If you've been uploading fully AI-generated videos on Snapchat in hopes of earning rewards, it might be time to rethink your strategy. Snapchat has announced changes to Spotlight that prioritize authentic, original creativity over content created entirely by artificial intelligence. The company says its recommendation system will now favor videos made by real creators, while fully AI-generated submissions will no longer qualify for monetization.

So what's changing on Spotlight?

Read more
LinkedIn is crowdsourcing its fight against AI slop
The company is rolling out a new button that lets you flag posts that seem AI generated.
LinkedIn seems like AI slop button

LinkedIn has a serious AI slop problem, and it's now turning to its own users to help fix it. The platform is rolling out a new button that lets users flag posts they suspect were generated by AI. It plans to use that feedback to fine-tune the system that decides how much reach a post gets outside a user's own network, based on how AI-generated it appears.

The announcement comes shortly after an analysis by Pangram found that more than forty percent of long-form LinkedIn posts are fully AI-generated, and it suggests that the reach-trimming measures the company rolled out earlier this year haven't been enough on their own.

Read more