Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. News

Twitter not liable for the rise of ISIS, rules federal court

Add as a preferred source on Google

A lawsuit alleging that Twitter was legally responsible for facilitating ISIS attacks has been dismissed by a federal district court judge in California.

The lawsuit was filed in January by the families of two U.S. government contractors (Lloyd “Carl” Fields, Jr. and James Damon Creach) who were shot and killed at a law enforcement center in Amman, Jordan. ISIS took responsibility for the attack, describing the perpetrator as a “lone wolf.”

Recommended Videos

The plaintiffs accused Twitter of violating the Anti-Terrorism Act by knowingly permitting ISIS to use its platform as a “tool for spreading extremist propaganda, raising funds and attracting new recruits.”

The suit claims that Twitter’s so-called “material support” has been “instrumental to the rise of ISIS,” enabling it to carry out numerous attacks, including the shooting in Amman, Jordan that resulted in the deaths of Fields and Creach.

However, the judge overseeing the case ruled in Twitter’s favor, dismissing the suit based on the Communications Decency Act (CDA), under which the company could not be held accountable for ISIS activity conducted on its social network.

“As horrific as these deaths were, under the CDA Twitter cannot be treated as a publisher or speaker of ISIS’s hateful rhetoric and is not liable under the facts alleged,” U.S. district court judge William H. Orrick wrote Wednesday.

The plaintiffs have the option to file a second amended complaint within the next 20 days.

Similar lawsuits have been brought against Twitter and Facebook this year. In June, the two social networks, and fellow tech giant Google, were hit with a lawsuit from the father of a woman killed in the Paris attacks in November. The suit, which is currently moving through French courts, claims the companies “knowingly permitted” ISIS to disseminate “extremist propaganda” on their respective platforms.

Another complaint was filed against Facebook in the U.S. in June by the loved ones of U.S. and Israeli citizens who were killed in attacks by Palestinian militants. The plaintiffs claim the company knowingly enabled the assailants to plan and carry out their attacks, and are seeking damages from Facebook to the tune of $1 billion.

Saqib Shah
Saqib Shah is a Twitter addict and film fan with an obsessive interest in pop culture trends. In his spare time he can be…
Instagram scammers are holding creators’ accounts hostage with copyright strikes
Meta’s copyright system is being weaponized against the creators it’s supposed to protect
A person holding a phone with the Instagram app open on it.

Imagine waking up to find your Instagram account suspended because someone claims you stole their content. You might know that the claim is false, but appealing it could take weeks. If you're a content creator, each day offline could cost you money. Meanwhile, the person behind the complaint offers to make the problem disappear for just a few hundred dollars.

According to a new BBC investigation, Instagram creators are being hit with this new online racket. Scammers are filing bogus copyright complaints and demanding payment to withdraw them, exploiting the fact that repeated claims can put an account at risk of suspension. The account owner may still have their password and login credentials, but that does little good when their content or account has been taken offline.

Read more
Social media users in Australia might get freedom from algorithms. I want it for us all.
Big Tech may soon have to give Australians more say over what lands in their feeds.
iPhone showing social media apps

Australians might soon get to hit the off switch on the algorithm running their social media feed. According to a BBC report, draft legislation set to land this week would force platforms to hand users that choice, and honestly, I believe every country deserves this option.

Why is the government pushing this now?

Read more
Instagram will limit reach for AI influencers who skip AI-generated label on their profile
Instagram tightens AI influencer disclosure rules with a clearer profile label
instagram-ai-generated-profiles

Instagram just drew a hard line around AI influencers pretending to be real people. The platform is renaming its old AI creator label to AI-generated profile, and this time it comes with penalties too. Accounts featuring a fully AI-generated person will see their reach cut if they skip the label, meaning your feed is about to get a lot more honest about who is actually behind the account.

So what counts as an AI-generated profile?

Read more