Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. News

The real reason fake social media accounts will haunt us for years to come

Add as a preferred source on Google

Over the past week, Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn all disclosed that they’ve removed legions of fake accounts from their platforms. Phony accounts on social media are nothing new, but the problem seems to continue even though platforms say they’re working to stop it.

After Facebook and Twitter announced on August 20 that they had removed hundreds of accounts from their platforms that were focused on discrediting the current protests in Hong Kong, LinkedIn revealed that it had blocked or deleted millions of fraudulent accounts.

Recommended Videos

Platforms like Facebook expect to constantly be adding new active users in order to sell ads and placate stockholders, which means a growing number of users — even if they’re fake — is always better than a shrinking user base, experts said.

“They are deliberately doing nothing and are guilty of willful negligence, and it’s costing society billions of dollars — from which they are profiting,” Aaron Greenspan, a former classmate of Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, who wrote a report estimating that about 50% or more of Facebook’s current monthly active users are fake, told Digital Trends.

LinkedIn said in a blog post that between January and June, 21.6 million fake accounts were either prevented from being created or taken down. LinkedIn said that 19.5 million accounts were prevented from being created in the first place and that 2 million fake accounts were found and deleted via human review and artificial intelligence.

Fake accounts are not just a spam risk: They’re essential to spreading misinformation or propaganda, as seen with the Facebook and Twitter China-based accounts that attempted to discredit the current events in Hong Kong.

“It’s not even a user experience problem or even a platform integrity problem, but one of cybersecurity and national security,” said Brian Keegan, an assistant professor in the Department of Information Science at the University of Colorado Boulder.

Image used with permission by copyright holder

Fake accounts mean you don’t know who or what to trust when you’re browsing through your feeds, and Keegan argued that inflated user numbers only benefit the social media companies themselves.

“A key performance metric is growth in users, and that’s a key metric that Wall Street looks at,” Keegan said. “They end up being stuck in a bind because on one hand, Wall Street wants to see user growth, and on the other hand, there’s this systematic problem of fake accounts.”

Digital Trends reached out to Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn for further comment on how they are attempting to curb the issue of fake accounts, but we have not yet received a response.

Greenspan’s January report for Plainsite, a legal research initiative, took a look at fake accounts on Facebook by analyzing the company’s quarterly reports on fake accounts.  The company said it deleted about 2.2 billion fake accounts in the first three months of 2019 — or about approximately 283 accounts per second. That number could be much higher now, Greenspan said.

Greenspan himself started a site called The Face Book during his time at Harvard and settled a dispute over a trademark for the site in 2009.

Although Greenspan’s report focused on Facebook, he said fake accounts are a problem across social media platforms.

“I’ve experienced an attempted attack by a fake account on LinkedIn, so it happens,” he said. “But people on LinkedIn expect more from a person’s profile — like a résumé — so it’s easier to detect if something is wrong.”

LinkedIn also has a much greater incentive to ensure users on their platform are actually real people: The company makes money off of job postings and recruitment services. It sells big companies on the idea that it has the right users, not just a large amount of them.

So what can be done? Facebook said in its August 20 blog post that it is constantly improving the technology to weed out fake accounts, but Greenspan says it isn’t doing enough to keep up with the pace of the problem.

“I don’t think they have a lot of good options … they would have to spend billions of dollars,” Greenspan said.

He said that platforms like Twitter and Facebook would have to fundamentally change their products or start over if they truly wanted to put an end fake accounts.

“They are utterly terrified of this issue because it could destroy their entire company,” he said. “It didn’t start out as a scam, but that’s what it’s become.”

Allison Matyus
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Allison Matyus is a general news reporter at Digital Trends. She covers any and all tech news, including issues around social…
Meta just pulled its most controversial AI image generation feature days after launch
Meta is framing this as "hearing feedback," not as fixing a consent problem.
Instagram Muse Image

A couple of days ago, I covered Meta’s announcement of the Muse Image, an AI tool that lets users generate images based on someone’s Instagram profile without asking the account owner. 

I also highlighted the risks associated with it in another piece, along with steps for opting out. Three days later, the feature is no longer available. 

Read more
Your YouTube playlists can now become actual TV shows, but there’s a catch you need to know
YouTube just gave Partner Program creators the episodic infrastructure that Netflix has been using to keep audiences hooked for years.
Electronics, Mobile Phone, Phone

YouTube just gave its creators a tool that streaming platforms take for granted. I’m talking about the ability to structure content as proper episodic TV. 

If you're in the YouTube Partner Program and you’ve been organizing your videos into playlists while praying that the algorithm and your audience notice, then Shows is the upgrade you've been waiting for.

Read more
I knew there was plenty of AI slop on LinkedIn. Shocking report says the problem is far worse than suspected
LinkedIn app on App Store iPhone

I already knew LinkedIn was overflowing with posts written by AI, recycled leadership advice, and those god-awful lessons about entrepreneurship. A new report suggests the situation is considerably worse than even the platform’s feed makes it appear.

AI-detection company Pangram analyzed more than one million posts scanned through its Chrome extension across LinkedIn, X, Reddit, Medium, and Substack. LinkedIn represented approximately one-third of everything scanned, yet produced 62% of all content Pangram flagged as AI-generated.

Read more