Skip to main content

Say hello to two of the cheapest smartwatches around, courtesy of China

Much like with smartphones, it seems as if Chinese companies are determined to win the race to the bottom, a race that seemingly dictates how certain companies currently conducts business. Two such companies are Oukitel and Bluboo, relative unknowns in the U.S. market but established entities in China. These firms recently announced the A29 and the Uwatch, respectively, both of which come in at under $100, but it sometimes pays to ignore face value and hack away at the layers.

Starting with the A29, Oukitel’s wearable uses Bluetooth 4.0 to sync contacts and play music from your phone, among other niceties. In addition, with the SIM card slot, you can make calls and send messages to your loved ones.

Recommended Videos

The A29 also manages to include a heart rate sensor, a pedometer, and a sleep monitor, as well as a 320mAh battery, which should give the smartwatch 150 hours of standby and four hours of talk time. Finally, the A29 works with both iOS and Android, giving the smartwatch flexibility that is still relatively uncommon in the smartwatch world.

Bluboo UwatchNext up is the Uwatch, Bluboo’s upcoming smartwatch. Bluboo was shy at revealing what powers the Uwatch, though the watch has a capacitive home button below the display, with bezels refreshingly kept to a minimum. Finally, unlike the A29, which seems to run proprietary software, the Uwatch will run Android Wear, possibly making the Uwatch the cheapest Android Wear smartwatch available.

What sets the A29 and the Uwatch apart from the competition, however, are their attractive points. Going for $70 and $50, respectively, these watches represent how quick the race to the bottom seems to have been completed for smartwatches. This makes sense, given the relative lower number of components needed for a smartwatch as opposed to those needed for a full-fledged smartphone.

At the same time, however, people have certain prices in mind when it comes to products. With smartwatches, the jury is still out, since the category is still rather nascent, but people will surely be wary of the $70 and $50 price tags of the A29 and the Uwatch, respectively. Unsurprisingly, the question will be what Oukitel and Bluboo had to sacrifice in order to get the prices so low, a question that should have an answer since both smartwatches will be released sometime this month.

Williams Pelegrin
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Williams is an avid New York Yankees fan, speaks Spanish, resides in Colorado, and has an affinity for Frosted Flakes. Send…
Why this luxury smartwatch isn’t out to beat the Apple Watch
The Montblanc Summit 3 on a mans wrist.

“When we decided to make a smartwatch, our inspiration was to take something from our history and give it smart technology. We’re trying to bring the story of watchmaking to smartwatches. Something that’s true to us”

This is how Felix Obschonka, category director of new technologies at Montblanc, described the company’s approach to its range of smartwatches, and how the new Summit 3 differs from models made by technology brands. However, the Summit 3 is also the first non-Samsung smartwatch to use Google’s Wear OS 3 software, so while it’s steeped in Montblanc’s history, it’s not lacking in tech credentials.

Read more
These two smartwatches reveal a dark side of Wear OS 3
The Galaxy Watch 5 Pro and the Montblanc Summit 5.

Since Google announced Wear OS 3 in 2021, the only way to experience the software has been on a Samsung smartwatch — either the Galaxy Watch 5 or Galaxy Watch 5 Pro, where it’s covered by the company’s own One UI Watch interface and tweaks. That has recently changed with the release of the Montblanc Summit 3, which also comes with Wear OS 3, but obviously not Samsung’s software.

It gives us a chance to see how Samsung’s vision for Wear OS 3 differs from Google’s, as there appears to be very little customization on Montblanc’s part. It turns out it’s very different, and using them may give us a glimpse as to what Wear OS 3 will be like when companies without Samsung’s experience eventually utilize the new software.
Same swipes, different results
The two smartwatches differ considerably in operation. Swipe up on the Galaxy Watch 5 Pro, and you get a list of installed apps — but do the same on the Summit 3, and you’re looking at your notifications. You press the button on the crown to see installed apps, where they’re presented in a vertical, named list. This is actually preferable to Samsung’s icon-based app list, which can be confusing as it's not always immediately obvious which apps some icons relate to. The Summit 3 is far more glanceable.

Read more
Android 12L and Wear OS 3 show Google still isn’t serious about tablets and smartwatches
Onn Android Tablet on Table

Late last year, Google introduced Android 12L, its operating system optimized specifically for tablets and foldables. After years of neglect, Google showed it was finally taking the form factor seriously. The same went for Wear OS 3, with Google breathing new life into smartwatches. There's just one problem for both.

As of the time of writing, not one tablet, foldable, or smartwatch has been updated to either of these operating systems. Google has planned to overhaul how its smartwatch and tablet platforms work for the better, but the company's rollout has undermined its ambitious plans.
Google's lofty ambitions

Read more