We don’t claim to be ethanol experts, but the more we learn about the fuel additive, the less we like it. Sadly, we now have even more reason to dislike E15. Tests are now showing that the E15 fuel mix can harm cars built after 2001 according to a recent API press release.
E15 – a gasoline blend with 15 percent ethanol – was green lit by the EPA in 2010 for mass-market implementation in order to meet the federal Renewable Fuel Standard.
This E15 blend has been shown to cause fuel pump failures, fuel system component swelling, and impairment of fuel measurement systems. E15 can also cause erratic and misleading fuel gauge readings or faulty check engine light illuminations. Additionally, E15 has been found to cause damage in engine valve and valve seats.
This is just one more nail in the coffin of ethanol as a mass-market fuel substitute. Ethanol, which mostly comes from corn in the US, has been promoted as a renewable fuel source. This couldn’t be further from the truth. Corn is produced through a hugely un-renewable agriculture industry. If that weren’t enough, ethanol contains less energy than gasoline so fuel efficiency is diminished with its use.
Ignoring its negative environmental impacts, ethanol, when specifically applied, can be a great fuel in the right application. Take the Koenigsegg CCX for example. When tuned to run on E85 (85 percent ethanol) the CCX power output is upped from 800 horsepower to 1018.
Unfortunately for those of us without a Swedish supercar, increased ethanol execution will only cause vehicle damage and breakdowns. So when you see a gas pump marked with an E15 sticker, avoid it.
A little biased is an understatement. Ethanol has been around for decades and all of a sudden it is bad for your vehicle. Really? So why is Brazil running on 100% ethanol? Yet 15% ethanol is bad for us? Sounds like somebody is a LITTLE bit protective of their market…We have cars that run on 85% ethanol. Shouldn’t they all, and let the consumer choose? It is cheaper fuel by the way.
Yea, here in the Southeast it’s very common to see these E-15 stations and they are usually cheaper than non-ethanol gas, which is really ridiculous. Why should we have to pay extra for non-ethanol gas, when ethanol has been clearly shown by many car experts that it’s NOT designed for many vehicles unless you have a FLEX fuel vehicle. Doesn’t make any sense to me, oh wait, the oil companies lobbied for those car makers to put ethanol in their cars to “hasten” their wear and tear so you have to get car earlier than usual.. and they wonder why we dislike them because of this..
This is just a little biased. The API is (American Petroleum Institute) and they had the study done by the CRC (COORDINATING RESEARCH COUNCIL) which is funded by the Petroleum industry.
Additionally, the report (Published January 2013) says the results reflect effects on a “subset” of components from cars dating from 2001 to 2007 … So, it is not dealing with new vehicles and in fact could even be construed to be focused on an opportunistic segment that would yield the most petroleum-industry-friendly results. But what consultant wants to make their benefactor look bad …
I’m sure it’s just convenient that they found evidence that rejects a non-petroleum supplement.