Skip to main content

IBM’s Watson supercomputer beats humans in Jeopardy

Its may only have been a practice match, but Watson has proven to be a serious competitor to the likes of Jennings and Rutter. Watson is IBM’s Jeopardy-playing supercomputer. And Ken Jennings and Brad Rutter — both Jeopardy champions — served as human competition today during a preliminary Jeopardy match with the machine.

IBM took four years to develop the supercomputer so that it would be capable of mastering the subtleties of the language-based trivia that defines Jeopardy. To get Watson at the Jeopardy-smart level, engineers scanned over 200 million pages of information into its memory.

Watson, named after IBM founder Thomas J. Watson, is made up of 10 racks of IBM Power 750 servers and runs Linux as its operating system. It also has 15 terabytes of RAM, and 2,880 processor cores. That makes Watson able to scan the millions of pages of data stored in its memory in a quick three seconds. Oh, and it won’t fit on a desktop — it’s the size of 10 refrigerators.

Watson is considered to be the next big step forward in artificial intelligence that could soon be applied to areas outside of games. Watson’s creators suggest the machine’s abilities may be useful in the health care industry in the future. In 1997, IBM supercomputer Deep Blue defeated Gary Kasparov in a chess match that ignited the public’s fascination in human-computer competition.

Despite some categories that seemingly only a human could comprehend (“Chicks Dig Me” for one), Watson triumphed in today’s practice round, but not by enough to signal an imminent Watson is ready to lead machines in a world-takeover. Watson finished with a score of $4,400 and Jennings came in second place with $3,400 and Rutter was last with $1,200.

Today’s practice round held in Yorkston Heights, New York set the stage for a series of Jeopardy matches with Watson to be held in February.

In this video, IBM explains why they chose Jeopardy to test its latest supercomputer.

Editors' Recommendations

Aemon Malone
Former Digital Trends Contributor
The robot ‘artist’ that’s challenging humanity’s concept of creativity
aida robot artist ai da in a seat  photographer victor frankowski

“People don't judge an artwork on its own merit,” said Aidan Meller, the director of a prestigious U.K. gallery called, well, the Aidan Meller Gallery. “They always do it through the lens of the artist. When you look at a Picasso or you look at Tracey Emin, you have a very different response based on the personalities that created [the work]. That's no different with a robot.”

It’s not the kind of conversation you might expect to have with an art expert and dealer whose previous big splash of publicity came, in 2014, when he helped bring to light seven large cardboard boxes of drawings found in a loft, which turned out to be highly significant Pre-Raphaelite School sketches. But somewhere, it seems, Meller’s trajectory changed course.

Read more
OpenAI’s GPT-3 algorithm is here, and it’s freakishly good at sounding human
GPT-2 AI Text Generator

When the text-generating algorithm GPT-2 was created in 2019, it was labeled as one of the most “dangerous” A.I. algorithms in history. In fact, some argued that it was so dangerous that it should never be released to the public (spoiler: It was) lest it ushers in the “robot apocalypse." That, of course, never happened. GPT-2 was eventually released to the public, and after it didn't destroy the world, its creators moved on to the next thing. But how do you follow up the most dangerous algorithm ever created?

The answer, at least on paper, is simple: Just like the sequel to any successful movie, you make something that’s bigger, badder, and more expensive. Only one xenomorph in the first Alien? Include a whole nest of them in the sequel, Aliens. Just a single nigh-indestructible machine sent back from the future in Terminator? Give audiences two of them to grapple with in Terminator 2: Judgment Day.

Read more
IBM will no longer develop or research facial recognition tech
IBM's Summit Supercomputer

IBM CEO Arvind Krishna says the company will no longer develop or offer general-purpose facial recognition or analysis software. In a June 8 letter addressed to Congress and written in support of the Justice in Policing Act of 2020, Krishna advocates for new reforms that support the responsible use of technology -- and combat systematic racial injustice and police misconduct.

“IBM firmly opposes and will not condone uses of any technology, including facial recognition technology offered by other vendors, for mass surveillance, racial profiling, violations of basic human rights and freedoms, or any purpose which is not consistent with our values and Principles of Trust and Transparency,” wrote Krishna in the letter.

Read more