Skip to main content

Skulls in the living room? Intel's NUC brings the pain with powerhouse internals

Although it might technically have missed its announced first-quarter launch window by a few days, nobody is going to argue that Intel’s uber-powerful Skull Canyon NUC isn’t an impressive piece of kit. Packing a Core i7 CPU with Iris Pro graphics, support for powerful DDR4 memory, and M.2 storage, it has the potential to change the face of small-form-factor PCs.

Intel previously talked up its Skull Canyon design back at CES 2016, describing it as a game changer with a new design, new focus, and possibly even a new intended audience. Now that we’ve gotten our first look at the system, we can see why.

It features a new form-factor design, with an elongated chassis that makes it look like a small console or Steam Machine, rather than a NUC. It also bears a large skull logo, which means this is unlikely to be marketed as a mainstream system. There’s definitely a gamer vibe about the whole thing.

Iris Pro 580 graphics aren’t anything to shrug at, with Intel previously stating that it was capable of outperforming as much as 80 percent of dedicated graphics cards (as per WCCFTech). Considering that’s sitting aboard the powerful, Skylake i7-6770HQ CPU, the result is a solid combination.

Related: Intel tries to downsize your gaming desktop with its new Skull Canyon NUC

We aren’t expecting this system to dominate high-end discrete GPUs of course, but if it can offer solid entry-level gaming at its $650 price tag, that could make it a solid purchase for a lot of people.

Overall performance will also depend on what additions people make to it, though. With support for up to 32GB of memory and the ability to utilize high-speed M.2 SSDs, the Skull Canyon NUC could be quite a powerhouse.

That should be especially true if you paired it up with an external GPU enclosure as TechReport suggests.

Connectivity-wise the Skull Canyon system offers a Thunderbolt 3 port, one “Display Port via USB-C,” four USB 3.0 ports, and a single SDXC slot. It also has support for Intel Dual Band Wireless AC and Bluetooth 4.2.

Available to pre-order now at $650, the Skull Canyon NUC will be officially available on May 12.

Would you have one of these in your living room?

Editors' Recommendations

Jon Martindale
Jon Martindale is the Evergreen Coordinator for Computing, overseeing a team of writers addressing all the latest how to…
Intel Raptor Lake breaks the 6GHz barrier, and it’s not even the flagship
Intel Raptor Lake chip shown in a rendered image.

With the release of Intel Raptor Lake inching closer, we're now seeing a flurry of benchmarks, spec leaks, and tests that all do a good job of driving up the hype for the next-gen processors. This time, it's once again the Intel Core i7-13700K that makes an appearance in two or three different tests. One thing is certain: It doesn't just make an appearance -- it shines.

The CPU appeared in a couple of CPU-Z tests, reaching intensely high clock speeds. It actually managed to hit 6GHz, surpassing the tests done on the flagship of the lineup, the Core i9-13900K.

Read more
Intel Raptor Lake could deliver a 60% performance upgrade, but there’s a catch
Intel Raptor Lake chip shown in a rendered image.

Engineering samples of the upcoming Intel Raptor Lake Core i7-13700K and Core i5-13600K processors have been thoroughly tested, and the results appeared on Bilibili, a Chinese social media platform.

Comparing the next-gen CPUs to their current-gen counterparts reveals massive performance gains, with some of the benchmarks returning up to 64% higher scores for Raptor Lake. Unfortunately, these performance gains come at a price.

Read more
AMD and Intel duke it out in the GPD Win Max 2, and there’s a clear winner
A small GPD Win Max 2 laptop being held by two hands while playing a game with a Viking on the screen

GPD Win Max 2, the recently announced upcoming gaming console/handheld laptop hybrid, was just tested in a series of rather extensive benchmarks. Seeing as the GPD Win Max 2 comes in two variants, one with an AMD processor and one with Intel, both of them were compared to each other.

Sometimes, benchmark results can be inconclusive, but this time around, the winner is very clear to the point of it almost feeling unfair. AMD scored a resounding victory, but is there any hope for redemption for the Intel version of the console?

Read more