surfer-mammoth-with-beer

Japanese scientists believe they have the technology and know-how to create a living woolly mammoth, a clone of a species that died thousands of years ago.

Finding a fully intact frozen woolly mammoth isn’t enough, it seems. Now, a professor at Kyoto University in Japan is planning to bring the species back from extinction through cloning, reports the AFP. Dr. Akira Iritani plans to insert the nuclei of mammoth cells into a modern elephant’s egg cell, creating a woolly mammoth embryo that will be brought to term by an elephant mother. The elephant was chosen because it is the nearest modern relative to the mammoth. Woolly mammoths died out during the last ice age, more than 5,000 years ago. Iritani thinks he can resurrect one in five years.

The key is soft tissue. Unlike older extinct species like the dinosaur family, scientists have been able to dig up entire frozen mammoth carcasses in Siberia, most of which still have soft tissue with cells containing DNA. The key breakthrough is a new technique that allows the scientists to extract DNA from frozen cells. Previously, frozen cells were thought to be too damaged (by the freezing process) to use for things like cloning.

“If a cloned embryo can be created, we need to discuss, before transplanting it into the womb, how to breed (the mammoth) and whether to display it to the public,” Iritani said. ”After the mammoth is born, we will examine its ecology and genes to study why the species became extinct and other factors.”

There is debate among the science community how exactly mammoths went extinct. Some believe that humans hunted the creatures to extinction while others believe that climate change did the furry elephants in. Let’s just hope that all of these scientists give Jurassic Park a watch before they start completing the mammoth genetic codes with frog DNA.

Would you pay to see a living woolly mammoth?


UPDATE 4/15/2011: LiveScience has a video that explains Iritani’s plans.

Showing 54 comments

  1. Guestzorz at 12:09am 18th January 2011 MAN do I love the Internet. This idea has been around for a long time, so I'm glad to see that they're making some advances. Completing the gaps with frog DNA? Never would have come up with that. Why frogs, I wonder? That HAD to have come from some trial-and-error testing.
    1. @JeffreyVC at 5:26am 19th January 2011 That was a Jurassic Park reference. I certainly hope they don't complete the gaps with gender-hopping frog DNA. If they do, hopefully they'll do it on a remote island off the cost of Costa Rica.
  2. MorningStar at 6:49pm 17th January 2011 Your I.Q. is so big that you misspelled PREGNANCY twice (that's 2 times, not a typo) and DIVINE, also the rest of it is littered with what I'm assuming are typos or simply more spelling errors. Your sentences are completely incoherent so I had to interpret them to the best of my ability. If your spelling, typing and grammar are a reflection of the rest of your mental abilities, you would have to be a total moron. As far as god's DIVINE plan is concerned; I didn't mis-examine anything, because I didn't give my opinion as to what god's plan is. I simply said that you don't know what it is.
  3. Here Ye! Here Ye! at 5:28pm 17th January 2011 MorningStar, there is no need for me to even acknowledge your comment directed towards me. because obviously you didnt pay attention to what I wrote. I never said I was against it. I was only saying they should not go to cutting it open. and doing surgical examinations on it unless it could pose a threat biologically.So MorningStar go tour some other site and dircect your comments elsewhere because you are much beneth my I.Q, to tackle anything I have to say. Also, as far as God's devine plans concerne; Ooowww believe me you u mis-examine that concept.
  4. Here Ye! Here Ye! at 2:16pm 17th January 2011 I am not going to comment on whether such a species should or shouldnt be cloned because there are so many positives and negatives on both sides of the issue. But I will say this; if it was brought back to life; it should be deemed brought to Life for Scientific observation only and not biological experiments. Because we have to consider. It is not a natural animal brought here by God and Life's nature alone through the pregnancey of a woolly mammoth; but instead by mans doing through the pregnancey of a simple Elephant.
    1. MorningStar at 4:08pm 17th January 2011 Who gives a crap? God made us and we'll make mammoths. It is his will, it will be done. Hahahah! Doesn't he work in mysterious ways anyway, who are you to tell everyone god's will? As if you know god's grand plan. The nerve of some people...
  5. @JeffreyVC at 1:56pm 17th January 2011 Just to put this out there, if we really wanted to naturally make more mammoths, we will need more than 2 to begin with. Just one won't do it. I'm sure they can conjure up more clones, but unless they have DNA from enough different mammoths to begin with, fully resurrecting the species might be difficult!
  6. APRILLE at 1:53pm 17th January 2011 I WOULD LIKE TO SEE A WOOLLT MAMMTH COME TO LIFE. IT DEPENDS ON WHERE ITS AT. I WONT BE ABLE TO GO OVER SEAS. I WOULD BE SO COOL TO SEE ONE. I HAVE ALL 3 OF JURASSIC PARK MOVIES. THEY HAVE TO BE REAL CAREFULL HOW THEY DO IT. AN ILAND WOULD BE THE BEST PLACE TO DO THIS. BEING ON THE SAFE SIDE. JUST HAVE TO WAIT AND SEE WHAT HAPPENS. APRILLE
    1. reubenhwk at 2:43pm 17th January 2011 Take a close look at your keyboard, there's a shift and a caps lock. Please use them correctly.
  7. eRIC at 1:53pm 17th January 2011 THE MOTHER WILL TRY TO STOMP IT TO DEATH, THIS IS A BAD IDEA
  8. Jim at 1:51pm 17th January 2011 How about cloning anyone who is killed by terrorists? Now that would be a definate discouragement to those r*ghead s o b's,
  9. gary at 1:51pm 17th January 2011 U say u want to bring back herds of wooly mammoths.wouldn't u have to try to bring back the sabor tooth tiger also to keep herds at a minamum?Even todays elephants are dangerous to man,how dangerous do u think wooly mammoths will be?If u did bring back the sabbor tooth tiger back to keep herds at a minamum then how dangerous will they be, hmmmm!
  10. agagne67 at 1:46pm 17th January 2011 I did not evolve to the top of the food chain to eat carrots so cows work for me; as well as pigs, chickens or most any other animal. Mammoth cloning... way cool. Hope it helps science over and may give us clues on how to cure things like hunger, cancer and the like. Darwin had it right any way strong will survive. If it makes it it was meant to be if not oh well.
  11. Dave at 1:38pm 17th January 2011 Remember the old movie "Boys from Brazil". Wonder what kinda shape Lenin's DNA is in. Maybe we can clone him as well. Bring back King Tut, clone Bernie Madoff. How 'bout 2 or 3 more Obama's running around with the public checkbook. (rofl)
  12. Liberty at 1:33pm 17th January 2011 Personally, I think the idea is way cool. I would love to see one irl, but how can the scientists know the animal won't be too volatile to keep safely in captivity - elephants have been known to kill their keepers in zoos. And, we're assuming it can be kept alive with food available now, but there might be different nutritional requirements - who knows. Obviously, people a lot smarter than me will weigh the risks. I wonder if they are bred for release if it will amplify the problem of poaching for the ivory - there are probably people who would pay a fortune for mammoth ivory. Maybe its only cool in an InGen sort of way
  13. JR-O8 at 1:27pm 17th January 2011 I AGREE WITH SAMANTHA. GOD DID THIS FOR A REASON. N WHY TRY TO PLAY GOD IF THERE IS ONLY 1 GOD. SO SCIENTISTS INVEST UR TIME AND SOMEBODY ELSE'S MONEY ON SOMETHING ELSE. LIKE A CURE ON CANCER, AIDS, AND SOME OTHE STUFF LIKE THAT
    1. Ringbearer31 at 1:44pm 17th January 2011 Not all scientists can work on cancer, and for all we know we may find a type of aids in the whooly mamoth that we can cure, leading to a cure for human aids. any persuit of science for the sake of knowledge is worthy until it is overdone, to the point where we learn nothing
    2. reubenhwk at 2:41pm 17th January 2011 ....Then why did God freeze the mammoths for us to find? If we weren't meant to do this, then why did we find frozen mammoths at roughly the same time as cloning technology was developed? Maybe God wants us to do this. And if cloning mammoths is playing God (because God has a reason to kill them off), then why isn't cancer and aids also part of God's plan? If we can't revive Mammoths because we'd be playing God, then maybe we shouldn't be curing cancer or aids either as that would equally be playing God...
  14. lamedebate at 1:21pm 17th January 2011 CLONES ARE STERILE !!! When you cross breed animal DNA such as a horse and a donkey the offspring (mule) cannot reproduce. The cloned sheep.. STERILE!!! They are using an elephant which has diffent DNA to clone a mammoth .. so its going to be two times sterile .. crossbred and cloned .. and what are you people commenting on a this site if you have not a damn clue what your talking about. If we solved world hunger, disease and what ever elso you hippys can come up with not only would the worlds population increase to the size that cannot be accomidated .. therefore we would go HUNGRY !!! you think world hunger is as easy as putting dna into an elephant egg then by all means do your thing. who cares if we clone a mammoth its not going to do anything but provide scientist a look back in time and people something to look at.
    1. Jimmybl at 1:36pm 17th January 2011 Apparently, lamedebate, from what I understand they're trying to do, it will be a TOTAL genome replacement. The only elephant DNA involved will be mitochondrial DNA, which is not involved in anything besides replicating mitochondria. So your argument is invalid and uninformed. Besides, it is hybrids that are sterile. Clones are not, any more than twins are.
    2. Allan at 1:51pm 17th January 2011 I believe the plan is to ultimately clone a mammoth, then impregnate that mammoth with DNA from another frozen mammoth, making a 3/4 mammoth. Then doing that again to make a 7/8 mammoth and so on and so forth until they have a mammoth that is almost 100% DNA accurate to the samples. It would take years and probably many dead test subjects, if even possible but they want to be able to bring a species back completely and successfully.
    3. allan at 1:51pm 17th January 2011 And not all cross-breeds are sterile (look at dogs, cats, etc....). There are multiple factors that limit an animals ability to breed if crossed with another breed and yes, some resulting offspring are sterile (the males anyways) but that is less likely the case than not the case. Deer are another example. A mule deer can breed with a blacktail deer and produce offspring that are perfectly capable of having offspring but if a mule deer breeds with a whitetail deer the male offspring are sterile.
  15. Frank Elia at 1:15pm 17th January 2011 if you thought hamburger was tasty. A woolburger should have a warm taste in your mouth for the winter. A resurection of life is a magical thing, and maybe we can celebrate more of humanity in the same way giving inspiration to taking care of the this planet and everything on it
  16. bryan at 1:11pm 17th January 2011 Not so sure on us bringing things back that have gone extinct. For some reason to me, cloning and bringing back extinct animals will be a lot like opening Pandora's box and a lot more like playing god. Somethings we just should not do, just because we can Besides, does anyone really think that the Wolly will be treated humanely. That thing will probably experimented on to death, and who will care because it is a clone.
  17. Samantha at 1:09pm 17th January 2011 Wow. All I can say is that certain animals are permanently gone from the Earth for a reason. Just because we CAN clone doesn't mean we SHOULD!
    1. reubenhwk at 2:34pm 17th January 2011 You're just quoting Jurassic Park. We've all seen it.
  18. Ringbearer31 at 12:53pm 17th January 2011 I'm pretty sure this is a good thing. If we could clone extinct animals we may be able to find one that produces more, better tasting meat while produces less was and greenhouse gasses than cows do, which by the way is ALOT bigger than gasses produced by our cars, becauses you HAD to add a fourth patty to that baconizer or whatever.
  19. thebrokenseal at 12:03pm 17th January 2011 yup, that's what we need another species. And, of course if released into the world. With such a careless creature such as human. it will eventually end up extinct, AGAIN.
    1. reubenhwk at 12:24pm 17th January 2011 If cloned, it will absolutely die. Everything dies at some point. It's nature. But cloning is a scientific advance that will eventually help us all. I don't understand your negativity.
      1. Aaron at 11:18pm 18th January 2011 I agree cloning with animalx will bring breakthroughs to all humanity. Think of getting a new heart or kidney. This will also bring advances in medicine and cancer research.
  20. sum dude at 11:38am 17th January 2011 yea, we've solved hunger, pain, suffering, war, common cold, etc. Why not spend the time and resources on such a noble and socially-benefiting manor...waking a dead species from thousands of years ago....humans suck. -guest
    1. reubenhwk at 12:15pm 17th January 2011 So nobody should do anything until hunger, pain, suffering, war, common cold are solved? You're a looser!
      1. MorningStar at 3:53pm 17th January 2011 HAHAHA! That's awesome.
      2. MorningStar at 6:23pm 17th January 2011 Ouch! I agree w/ reubenhwk.
  21. MorningStar at 11:28am 17th January 2011 This site sucks, they delete any comment they don't like. SWEET CENSORSHIP YOU OPEN MINDED NAZIS!
    1. ioman at 11:58am 17th January 2011 Dude, tons of people reported your post. You said you would blow up a kindergarten to see a Mammoth. Or kill your own mom. What did you expect!? lol
      1. MorningStar at 3:50pm 17th January 2011 a lol or 2... i thought it was funny, what a bunch of babies. >:D
  22. ioman at 10:21am 17th January 2011 Question: Can these cloned mammoths reproduce? As in, a female and a male clone?
    1. Tim at 10:31am 17th January 2011 why not?
      1. ioman at 10:57am 17th January 2011 I have never read about cloned animals reproducing. Have cloned cows or sheeps? Maybe I have missed that.
        1. Tim at 11:14am 17th January 2011 yes, they're normal animals. nothing is missing. if their "parents" can, so could the clone. i don't know what would make you think that they couldn't.
          1. random_guy at 11:22am 17th January 2011 The movie "Aeon Flux" was about a society of clones that couldn't breed. Everyone was at least a 5th or 6th generation (or something like that) clone.
            1. Renee at 1:45pm 17th January 2011 Since we're being random, the characters in Aeon Flux were cloned because humans could no longer reproduce (the side-affect of the cure for a plague). They were not unable to reproduce because they were clones. Eventually "nature" restored itself and the cloned people were able to achieve unassisted "non-clone" pregnancies.
          2. Scott at 1:11pm 17th January 2011 Well....if I'm not mistaken a Mule is a sterile offspring of a horse and donkey. So sometimes mixing species can produce offspring...but that offsring sometimes won't be able to reproduce. And one can clone a species that can be sterile so that reproduction is taken out of the equation. HOWEVER......if you paid attention to Jeff Goldblum's character in Jurassic Park......he says "Life finds a way". So take that science.
            1. Michael Murray at 1:37pm 17th January 2011 Ummm...that was Sam Neill's character.
              1. Bob at 1:46pm 17th January 2011 Actually, Goldblum's character said it first near the beginning of the movie.
            2. Tim at 3:46pm 17th January 2011 Well it's NOT a hybrid, like a mule. It's a clone. And not all hybrids are sterile anyway.
              1. Aaron at 11:14pm 18th January 2011 Clones cannot reproduce. That is a fact
  23. Jack at 9:48am 17th January 2011 @H Mister They can just deliver it like a preemie baby when its the same size as a fully developed elephant. Shouldn't be a problem for people who can CLONE AN EXTINCT SPECIES.
  24. Danny at 9:46am 17th January 2011 There we go again, every time another country creates a breakthru, the press in the united states makes fun of it.
    1. reubenhwk at 12:26pm 17th January 2011 As long as somebody is doing something for the advancement of science, it's a good thing (too bad it is US though)...
      1. reubenhwk at 12:27pm 17th January 2011 Sorry, I meant "IS'NT US"
  25. allen at 9:23am 17th January 2011 I would pay for a nice thick woolly tbone steak.
  26. H Mister at 9:10am 17th January 2011 Hek yeah I would! I think the issue will be in keeping the host (mother) alive throigh out the entire gestation period. Woolly mamoths were 1/3 larger than the elephants today.
Close Suggestion NASA unveils weird airplane concepts for 2025
View Article