HP, RIM and Samsung take note: You’re doing it wrong. Here’s what potential challengers will really have to do to get traction against the iPad.

Want to get into the tablet PC business?

Stop.

Remember the warning Dorothy, Toto, the Scarecrow, the Tin Woodsman and the Cowardly Lion encountered on their way into the enchanted forest on their way to their appointment with the Wicked Witch of the West? “I’d turn back if I were you.” Since you’re not Dorothy and a bucket of water will not melt Steve Jobs, that’s good tablet PC market advice. (There’s a joke about Apple sales-associates as flying monkeys in there someplace, but damned if I can find it.)

At last count, Apple has sold 4.19 million iPads in around six months and is selling roughly 1.3 million a month. Earlier this month, an analyst observed that the iPad has been adopted faster than any other technology or gadget. And you do know that iPod still holds a 76 percent market share in the MP3 player business after fending off nearly a decade-worth of Dorothy/iPod wannabes?

This is the giant, scowling, floating, flaming head you want to chase around?

Okay, you don’t believe in Apple spooks, Steve Jobs is just a man behind the curtain and you plan on pushing ahead with your tablet. Since you must be a pain junkie, here’s my mixed-metaphor 12-step yellow brick road program to the tablet Emerald City.

Just don’t say I didn’t warn you.

Step 1. No Spec Zone

Don’t compare specs. Ever. No one cares about obscure alphanumeric acronyms or what jacks or slots or cameras you have that the iPad doesn’t (have you ever tried shooting a picture with something the size of a Dr. Seuss book? AWK-ward!). The iPad isn’t about specs – it’s what you can do with it. Once you start your spiel with “our tablet has four more quads per channel than the iPad…” you’ve lost the argument. (Extra credit if you can identify the “four more quads per channel” reference.)

Step 2. It’s Alive!

Okay, there’s one spec you’re allowed to brag about: battery life. You can watch 10 hours of video on the iPad on a single charge. (Notice I didn’t say “the iPad has a 10-hour battery life – that’s a spec comparison.) How much video can we watch on your tablet without a recharge? If I can’t watch three films and maybe do a little work on a flight to Asia, follow the Cowardly Lion’s first instinct to leave the forest.

Step 3. Mine’s Smaller, But Better

Here’s a spec you definitely shouldn’t brag about – a 7-inch screen. Yes, a tablet with a 7-inch screen is more mobile, it’ll fit in a suit or cargo pants pocket, blah blah blah. But a 7-inch screen is not just three inches smaller than the iPad’s 9.7-inch screen. Put ‘em side-by-side (and I have) and you’ll see the iPad’s screen is around twice the area of a 7-inch display. And sorry, Dell – the 5-inch Streak is not a tablet). People will put them side-by-side. Then they’ll compare prices. Uh oh.

Image courtesy of Gizmodo

Step 4. Maker it Cheaper

HP, how do you price your Slate 500, a tablet with a smaller screen (8.9 inches) and less battery life than the iPad, at $100 more than an iPad? And Samsung, you priced your Galaxy Tab, with a 7-inch screen and less battery life, only $30 less than an iPad. (Sound of buzzer) I’m sorry, you didn’t win, but thanks for playing our game.

Step 5. …But Not Cheap

Have you handled an iPad? Forget what’s inside – the thing feels like it’s worth 500 bucks. By contrast, Samsung’s plastic Galaxy Tab, well, doesn’t.

Step 6. Naming Rights

Yes, critics pounced on the “iPad” moniker, comparing it (unfavorably) to a digital sanitary napkin. No one’s snickering now – except at would-be competitor attempts at tablet names such as RIM’s PlayBook. Like the mis-named “mosque at Ground Zero,” RIM’s tablet is neither for play nor is it a book. RIM has referred to PlayBook as a “professional tablet” – as opposed to an amateur tablet? – yet the name is completely oxymoronic in the “drive on a parkway, park on a driveway” way.

Step 7. Working Girl Appeal

Don’t say your tablet is designed for “professional” users to begin with. First, we all know you’re just trying to lower competitive expectations, and consumers can smell desperation. Second, the iPad already has been adopted by any number of businesses, even though Apple didn’t stress this “professional” use in its marketing. Instead, describe your tablet like Melanie Griffith’s character in Working Girl, Tess McGill, describes herself: “I have a head for business and a bod for sin.” I’d buy that tablet.

Step 8. Go Into Business

If you’re going to say your tablet is designed for someone rather than everyone, be specific. At last month’s CEDIA, every home and system control company – Crestron, AMX, Control4, Z-Wave, ZigBee – showed iPads as controllers, potentially replacing their own multi-thousand-dollar touchscreen devices. In addition, several cars – Mercedes Benz, the Hyundai Equus, the Toyota Tacoma, the BMW X3 – feature iPads as bundled accessories. These associations are no accident. Apple actively pursued these vertical businesses.

Step 9. Fictional Character Endorsement

Suddenly, the iPad is the biggest star on TV. Apple’s tablet has made appearances in episodes of The Good Wife, NCIS, CSI: New York, Parenthood, Law & Order: Special Victim’s Unit – at that’s just one month into the new TV season. Since there won’t be a James Bond movie for a while, you’ll have to find a role for your tablet in a different cultural geek zeitgeist franchise. Do hobbits use tablets?

The iPad on ABC’s Modern Family

Step 10. No Stylus

Really, HP? A stylus? Oh, I’m sorry – a “digital pen.” Really? And no place on the Slate to store it? Really? Hey, HP. 1987 called. It wants its technology back.

Step 11: The Kitchen Sync

Unlike a cellphone, which has instant utility out-of-the-box, a tablet is, literally, a tabula rasa – you have to put stuff in it in order to get anything out of it. It has to be easy for consumers to acquire and load up their tablet with their photos, music, movies, and games, otherwise your tablet will be no more than a limited-function, silicon-filled plastic slab with a screen, and we already have those – they’re called Kindles. But Android mystifyingly still lacks an official iTunes-like desktop content sync client. DoubleTwist works, but it’s not nearly as seamless or fast as iTunes. If RIM wants PlayBook to appeal beyond its core base – or even to its core base – it’ll have to expand its BlackBerry Desktop Manager beyond contacts, e-mail and music to all the multimedia content that RIM is boasting the PlayBook can play. Microsoft does have the Zune marketplace, but the HP Slate runs full Windows 7, not Windows Phone 7.

Step 12: Got Apps?

Last, but definitely not least, see Step 1. What can I do with your tablet? E-book apps, the tablet equivalent of the Munchkins multitude, don’t count. Not all Android apps will work on all Android devices, especially tablets with their larger screens. RIM hasn’t said whether the PlayBook will run any of the current third-party App World apps because it won’t run the current BlackBerry OS 6, but a new OS called QNX, which means a dearth of third-party PlayBook play and work apps at launch. HP’s Slate runs Windows, but how do you get additional Windows apps on it? I hereby declare no tablet can be sold without access to a minimum of 1,000 apps, with the promise of at least 10,000 within a year. The great and powerful Oz has spoken. Now, go!

Still want to get into the tablet business? Short of following my yellow brick road, you might as well simply tap your heels together three times.

Showing 51 comments

  1. Ira at 4:53pm 15th December 2010 The Nook, right now, is the only serious iPad competitor because it is smaller, lighter, cheaper and has an IPS screen. But wait, it can't do as much and it runs that Friggin' Android 2.1. It's like comparing a Toyota Yaris with a Lexus. Which one would you rather be driving?
  2. NakedTruth at 2:31pm 1st December 2010 Hey Stewart Wolpin ( Dodo :) ) What would you do with an IPAD? a. Browse the web - 80% of websites use flash -- IPAD is a looser b. Carry it around to read stuff - Its size of a netbook, you need a suitcase/bag for it -- IPAD is a looser c. Apple Apps - 99% same apps that are on the Iphone look bigger ( without any added value), use Iphone instead -- IPAD is a looser d. Watch movies - where while travelling refer point b. Watch movies at home - its too big to hold it in your hand - keep it on your lap - Lord, whats the laptop for then? IPAD is a looser e. Type documents on the move - cannot hold it in your hands and type - one must keep it on the table /lap to type - isnt that a netbook/laptop - IPAD is a looser f. Fashion statement - yes true it is - great to show off to everyone that I am 99th million fool to have bought into the Apple marketing hype ( without using an ounce of brain to judge for myself), Talking about Fashion and media - on the Fashion ramps you see anorexic models( without brains) - similar to IPAD beautiful meant for the ramp - PLEASE STAY THERE. As you saw there isnt much utility to it so might as well.
  3. cerebral_cortex at 5:36pm 18th November 2010 choice is the best thing, its great to have alternatives to meet your needs. if you want a fashion statement & hyper-marketing buy Apple, if you don't , buy Android. Just because one is better for you , doesn't mean its better for the next person. It seems to me that Apple have learnt of what Sony did in the 80's with the Walkman and their T.V. Its great to have a choice.
  4. Orion at 6:21pm 30th October 2010 Ipad is better than all of those orther ones theyvlook like big phones not small tablets
  5. Me Myself and I at 9:46am 28th October 2010 Wish I could have this writer's job. I just have to believe the writer was being sarcastic and was facing some kind of deadline and just wipped something off the top of his head. It's a shame the author didn't look a little further around his own web site to see what others are writting about RIMj and Samsung's tablet. Oh, and the day I don't compare specs between competing products is the day I hand in my tech-geek card.
  6. Sean at 5:07pm 27th October 2010 The technically minded user is the minority, Apple is more interested in selling millions of units to the general public, than it is to people who read tech blogs and drool over product specs. Its not true that Apple have used hype to sell their products, they use savvy marketing, which creates hype. Fair enough some early adopters and fanboys will buy anything that Apple brings out, but take a look at the figures from their latest quarterly profits call, the numbers are staggering are you relly arguing that their wrong?. If you don't like Apple just say it, but you can't ignore success, you can only envy it
  7. ore masta at 12:09pm 27th October 2010 How to crush the iPad in 1 easy step. 1. Run it over.
  8. itninja at 8:28am 27th October 2010 Yeah, fooling everyone. Sure.
  9. rob at 7:27am 27th October 2010 I am laughing I really am...the user got a couple of things right but a few glaring things wrong...and thats why I think we should pretty much ignore anything this guys says about tech in the future. It's all in how you spin it, I mean look at apple they used hype to convince everyone their products were actually good and look at their market share today. 1 I like smaller because it's easier to carry with me and hold. Compare those big honkin' brick cell phones to the modern sleek and easy to hold models we have today...see my point 2 Dont create any itunes like software...itunes is plain garbage. Having to create a playlist in order to get your music on your phone in exactly the way you want it is a step back not a step forward. Pluging in your phone and having it mount like a usb key, dropping your content in and have your phone see all your content and let you access it just like that and vice versa for getting stuff off your phone in the same way thats progress. Usb keys simple to use right simpler than itunes right...so simple even this author should be able to manage it. 3 I like tech specs dont be afraid to use it to get the more technically minded user interested in your device, just dont use it exclusively
  10. Adam J at 7:24am 27th October 2010 I haven't seen an 'optimized for IE' website in quite a while. That would be suicide today--you'd be ignoring over half your potential viewers. And I really don't see anyone paying $10 for a browser that would be undoubtedly inferior to Safari.
    1. itninja at 8:06am 27th October 2010 unless it were Opera, Firefox, or Chrome. Those are better than Safari. But when Apple did let Opera submit a "browser" app for the iPhone/iPod, it was little more than a skinned Safari browser. Apple doesn't know what to do with competition in real life. They rely on image and it WILL come back and bite them. It already has in the mobile market. What you will see is the gradual shift in focus away from that market in Apple marketing so that those who are trend followers forget that they were a force there because they are looking where they are a force now. I remember when a G3 or G4 was the PC to have in the popular circles, but how many people are worried about Apple desktops or laptops now? Very few. Apple has moved on. They still sell them, but it is the red-headed step-child product of the family.
      1. Sean at 5:00pm 27th October 2010 When did Apple get bitten in the mobile market? last i heard they have still shifted millions of iPhones, were making larger quarterly profits than Nokia (from a fraction of the market share) and are selling their devices and iOS while Google is giving theirs (Android) away for free. You may see a gradual shift, but you could prove that for any success if your draw a long enough timeline
    2. nanonano at 8:33am 27th October 2010 @Adam J The iPhone/iPad problem is incompatibility with FLASH (not IE optimization). A multitude more websites depend on FLASH before they even consider IE.
  11. Sekhar at 7:23am 27th October 2010 Thanks for your information but i think there is no need to follow that many steps.
  12. attachedmama at 7:11am 27th October 2010 I very much doubt that most site as optimized for IE anymore.
  13. deewpb at 6:55am 27th October 2010 The only thing that I think people are overlooking is that many websites are "optimized" to Internet Explorer and will either not run well or not at all on a Safari or Mozzilla browser. This is simply Apple's arrogance in ignoring Microsofts presence in the business community and Microsofts arrogance in ignoring the impact of the ipad by not writing an IE app for it. This could have been a $9.99 download that many, many ipad users would buy with out even thinking about it, and Microsoft would have made a ton of money. Way to go Ballmer and Jobs!
  14. Arthur Dent at 6:45am 27th October 2010 No specs? Yeah, because the iPad isn't about what you can do with it, it's about having a $500 fashion statement. This is why no one takes Apple fanboys seriously.
  15. Phil at 6:39am 27th October 2010 HP can price their Slate a good 25% more than the ipad, it would be worth it to pay that much for something that's actually usable.
  16. topperspot at 6:17am 27th October 2010 I spent a weekend using an ipad and I still do not get what the fuss is about. I couldn't edit documents on it so it is not going to be that useful for my work and I don't watch video enough to justify the price although netflix was the only thing I found that I thought it did well.. I found it awkward to hold and view.
    1. Sean at 4:50pm 27th October 2010 Rectangles can be pretty awkward to hold for beginners, what kind of documents couldn't you edit on it?, heard of apps?
  17. ZungHow at 5:46am 27th October 2010 I dont see what all the fuss is about. I have an iPhone4 and it fits in my pocket. Oh yeah, I can make calls from it too :) anonymize.it.tc
    1. Phil at 6:45am 27th October 2010 I have a 4.5" Droid X, it fits in my pocket but the screen is so big I almost don't feel the need for a tablet. Plus I can choose which apps to run on it, not have someone else choose for me.
      1. nanonano at 8:30am 27th October 2010 @phil "I can choose which apps to run on it, not have someone else choose for me." That's why people "jailbreak" iPhones. It opens a whole new selection of apps, which do not depend on iTunes for download and installation.
        1. Sammyboy at 9:34pm 26th November 2010 Jailbreak and deal with waiting for each update of ios to be jailbroken and hope that itunes works with the jailbreak. When you decide to jailbreak you end up fighting apple every step of the way as they remain spiteful over not being able to make jailbreaking illegal. Not to mention voiding your warranty. Can't really compare that to downloading an .apk and installing.
  18. FTW at 2:03pm 26th October 2010 This is probably the worst tech article ever written. All it contained were stupid pop culture references and lame jokes. Dont stress hardware specs? If you as the manufacturer dont stress them, eventually someone will like say I dont know, DigitalTrends or CNET or PC Mag. Its all about stressing the best of what your tablet has to offer. Much like the smartphone race where Samsung and Apple have marketed their screens (AMOLED/Retina Display) as the best. Or their processors (1 GHz) speed and efficiency. That translates into what a product can do and into what a product will be used for. RIM should market advanced antenaes, battery life or UI gestures. Please just something that Apple or the other tablet makers havent already pounced on. The battle over screen size and quality is a battle of attrition. Focus on a low-lying fruit that has yet to be picked and displayed as superior to others versions of it.
    1. Carrie at 3:22pm 26th October 2010 I thought the jokes were funny, obviously our tastes differ. As for hardware specs, its not about the specs, its about the experience. When will people start to get this? The Zune has great specs, but an awful experience. The PS3 has amazing specs, but the Wii outsells it. Listen, specs are important, I agree, but you don't have to have the BEST of everything, just enough to where the experience will not be hurt because the hardware is underpowered.
      1. Patrick at 4:38am 27th October 2010 Everytime someone tells me its "about the experience" i die a little. Its such a washy answer. Be a little bit more specific. Good comment : "The user-interface is simple and intuitive"; Bad comment: "I enjoyed the experience". Pick a lane!!
        1. Dave at 1:26pm 20th May 2011 I think what Carrie said was on point. The issue is (and what Apple seems to get) is that "experience" using any one product comes down to many factors, so therefore, the "lane" as you call it isn't clearly defined. I believe what that articles talks about is correct. It's not about specs. Specs are nice...but they come after what the product can actually do for you. Being a tech geek myself, I understand that specs are important (and I always do side by side comparisons), but its only after I see two products that are attractive to me for other reasons. It comes down to the actual appearance of the unit, the UI, the ease of use, the availability of add-ons and apps...etc. After that, specs come in as well. But the "experience" is a fine comment for someone that is not extremely tech-savvy, which most users aren't. "I enjoyed the experience" means that the creators of the product took all of those things involved with the experience and executed them well into one device. They are all in the same lane.
      2. Bejan at 6:00am 27th October 2010 As an electrical engineer saying it's all about the experience makes my job about a thousand times harder. Here I'm used to having a specific parameter to meet. Instead if your going for an experience I have to build something that'll work well with specific software. I agree 100% that experience is very important (personally more important). Which is why I will never buy an android. I just wanted to get it out there that I believe it's the reason it's so difficult for hardware makers to make a well experienced product when using software build by another.
        1. doug at 7:29am 27th October 2010 i guess this is why Samsung, RIM, and all other Tablet (or phone) "competitors" need to have a Steve Jobs-esqe person to keep throwing it back at you and say "not ready", "this is crap", and "are you even trying?"
          1. Paul at 9:18am 27th October 2010 They could snap up Ray Ozzie. I think he is looking for another job with low expectations!
      3. Rob at 7:15am 27th October 2010 really the wii outsells the PS3...really? Sorry I wasnt aware of the alternate shift in reality
        1. Simon at 7:53am 27th October 2010 http://www.nexgenwars.com/ you're welcome
          1. Carol at 8:11am 27th October 2010 Thanks FTW..I think you were right on...I think all the APPLE appliances are fashion statements although their laptops and PCs are great for those in the Arts or designers...the majority of the business world uses Windows or other platforms that are not 'cutesy' or about the 'experience'...
            1. Charlie at 9:55am 27th October 2010 Good observation Carol, I agree with your statement "I think all the APPLE appliances are fashion statements"....most, not all of, but most people I know only have an iPhone or ipad because they are on AT&T network and/or are talked into buying apple because they are not tech savvy.
              1. PXLated at 10:43am 27th October 2010 Every tech savvy person I know has an iPhone and iPad. I know very few people that have bought them strictly for the sex appeal.
                1. dave at 2:33pm 7th November 2010 Now that is Funny! Where do you live? Alabama? I'm seeing more and more fat, old, and ignorant people with iPhones and Macs than ever before. I gave up my Apple ways not long ago (and other techies) because of their restrictive platform. Stop drinking the Kool-Aid.
              2. Dave at 1:48pm 20th May 2011 I would actually say the same thing about Android devices. I consider myself tech savvy, along with many other iPhone users I know (as well as Android devices, but not as many...only do to the flooding of the market with them). The rest of my family has always been on Verizon, so previous to the iPhone they were talked into buying random Android devices that the salesman told them "were better". Now I get phone calls and emails from 20 different people asking how to do tasks on their phone. And to be honest, when I actually have time to show them...the UI often lacks compared to the iPhone. Maybe if they bought one for a "fashion statement" they could also get the bonus of it being easier to use and not call me so much.
      4. Justin at 11:09am 13th November 2010 Ah yes, the Console Wars is an awesome way to make an example of this foolish bickering. It's not about specs, apps, size, or any of this. IT'S ABOUT WHAT THE CONSUMER WANTS. I have an iPod Touch, and I love it, I played on iPhone and the iPad and I felt that the latter was an iPod Touch with 3g and a phone app, and the later was a gigantic iPod that i could not place in my pocket. I personally like the Blackberry, phone and tablet, yet I'm not going to bash someone that likes the iOS or Android OS and choose their products accordingly. I have an Xbox 360. I've played on a PS3 and a Wii, I just don't like them as much, personal opinion is all that matters in this, fighting is childish. </rant>
    2. Simon at 5:59am 27th October 2010 Hardware specs are not important, its what you can do with them that counts. Remember, a 1.2Ghz modern day processor is faster than a four year old 3Ghz processor, if the Ghz specs are simply stated side by side which would you go for? Its better to leave the hardware specs to the small print as the typical end user really doesn't care at the end of the day; what end consumers want to know is if the device they are purchasing will do what they want it to do simply and intuitively.
    3. JJ Pagac at 6:25am 27th October 2010 Yes specs are good. However, most people aren't buying the technology because they fully understand specs. They are buying the item for it's "feeling". They are buying something they believe will make them happy. Specs scare some people, and most don't understand what they mean. They do understand things like, watch a movie for 10 hours, really clear screen, entertainment. Apple's specs are actually pretty impressive for the value. However, they have shown that if you want to sell a piece of technology, you make that product look fun, not geeky.
      1. Arthur Dent at 6:47am 27th October 2010 So, basically you're saying that Apple products are for dumb-dumbs. I will note that for future reference.
        1. itninja at 7:57am 27th October 2010 If the shoe fits...
  19. Steve W at 1:03pm 26th October 2010 I forgot to mention that if I were Apple I would sue Samsung. How to crush the iPad in 3 easy steps: 1) Start a rumor that Apple is going to build a smaller iPad. 2) Build a tablet that looks EXACTLY like a half size iPad. 3) Let everybody mistakenly believe that it IS an iPad.
    1. James at 2:09pm 26th October 2010 4) Sell it in the same Verizon store side-by-side with the iPad and the Galaxy Tabs gathers dust.
  20. Steve W at 12:58pm 26th October 2010 You should flip the Galaxy Tab on it's side in the picture. Then it will be obvious that it is half the size of the iPad - and more compact. The current picture does show the dimensions and you will notice that the Galaxy Tab is almost exactly as tall as the iPad is wide, and half as wide as the iPad is tall.
  21. anon at 12:31pm 26th October 2010 I think you meant tabula rasa? Never heard of a tabla rosa unless it's a pink indian drum.
  22. Ronin at 11:38am 26th October 2010 Buck Swope says it with a coffee mug in his hand in a cowboy costume. Boogie Nights rules. "See this system here? This is Hi-Fi... high fidelity. What that means is that it's the highest quality fidelity."
  23. Michael at 11:28am 26th October 2010 Actually Apple has sold over 7 million iPads in the passed 6 months. That 4.19 million number for the last quarter alone.
  24. zimdba at 10:39am 26th October 2010 "Boogie Nights" is the Quads per Channel reference.
  25. ioman at 10:29am 26th October 2010 I read somewhere that although the Samsung Galaxy Tab has a high resolution display, the Android apps that it is compatible with do not support that high of a resolution, and therefore do not look as good as they should. I also read that the Galaxy Tab feels way too plasticy and cheap. What a shame.
Close Suggestion Nielsen recants app-less iPad figures
View Article