When Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner was first released in 1982, it was hailed as a modern day “meh.” The film was only a moderate success following a disappointing opening weekend, and most audiences initially overlooked it—which isn’t all that surprising when you consider that it opened against Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan, John Carpenter’s The Thing and E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial. Critics were also somewhat split on it, but most enjoyed it, and the film received several accolades come award season.
But accolades don’t pay the bills, and it was a few years before Blade Runner really began to gain the recognition and support that would eventually help define it as one of the seminal science-fiction movies ever made. And one person that never gave up on it was Scott, who over the years “Lucased” the movie, and had a hand in re-releasing several different versions. Thankfully, none of them featured the character of Deckard shooting first, but in total, there have been seven versions of the film–although it wasn’t until 1992’s Director’s Cut that Scott was consulted on the new versions.
Regardless of the cut of the film, Blade Runner has left its mark, so it was really only a matter of time before someone in Hollywood succeeded in resurrecting the franchise–many have tried to create a sequel to Blade Runner over the years, but they have all failed. Earlier this year, Alcon Entertainment secured the rights to the property. Those rights included the possibility of any prequels or sequels, as well as any new stories based on the movie, but prohibited the possibility of remaking the original film. There may be some loopholes regarding the possibility of re-adapting the original source material, Philip K. Dick’s Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?, from which the movie was only very loosely based, but Alcon seemed content to develop films based on the original. But what would Blade Runner be without the involvement of Scott?
According to Deadline, Ridley Scott has signed on produce and direct a new Blade Runner film based on the original. It isn’t clear if the new movie will be a prequel or a sequel, but it will not be a remake. There is no script yet, and a new film could be years away, but Scott has confirmed his involvement.
It has been something of a nostalgic year for Scott, who is currently working on the film Prometheus, a new movie that is being called a “cousin” to Scott’s original Alien film. Prometheus is part prequel and part reimagining, but it still fits into the established Aliens universe, which may be the route the new Blade Runner film takes. Or not. It is still way too early to tell.
But regardless, now that Scott is involved, it is good news for fans of the original. Expect to hear more about the next Blade Runner following the completion of work on Prometheus, which is due in theaters on June 8, 2012.
wasent there a sequel written for bladerunner?…in the style of Dick…that was great
I don’t know about the “very loosely based” comment. The movie definitely took a lot out and reworked some things, but give Dick credit where he’s due, the movie was largely based on the book.
The main character and the idea of a guy hunting androids was the same, but everything else was totally different. In the book, Earth was dying from radiation, and that was the major theme. Everything revolved around that. In Blade Runner it is more of a dystopian look at the future. I liked both, but I thought they were miles apart.
I can understand that argument, and this debate could probably make a good article in itself. However, I still think that Blade Runner just isolated several of the books’ motifs, while leaving several more out, but had more in common with the book than not.
Oh this will be awesome
The original will be hard to beat but a prequel or a sequel would be most welcome.
I think they should try to make a new version, if they can. Todays CGI COULD make a hell of a great movie from this. Ofcause somethings are better as they were. As long as the story and characters will be played by skilled actors (not neccesarly famous) and the story gets a lot of depths as the original does, then I have no problem with a sequal or prequal. But lets see if its worth it or not – they will have a hard time beating the original I think.
Seems Hollywood has run clean out of original scripts. Apparently, creativity does have a limit…..or does it
When are they going to leave stuff alone. Come up with an original idea!
Awesome. Just watched Blade Runner recently and enjoyed again. Looks better in HD than on VHS tape ;-). How many versions of Blade Runner do you own?
I own–or have owned three versions of Blade Runner (original, Directors, and Final Cut), on two mediums (I had the Directors in VHS and DVD), so 4 total. And I really want the bad ass 5 disc blu-ray version…
How many versions of Blad Runner are available on DVD or Blu-Ray? Only the Directors Cut right?
I still have the original 1982 VHS version, a dvd version of that one, and a dvd of the Director’s Cut. Though I would love to own the 5 disc BR I have no BR player. :-(
I cannot wait for this! I don’t own any versions anymore. I have toyed with the idea of getting the Blu-ray version but cant justify the price.