Apple-gavel-antitrust-governement-laws

A man from Blaine, Minnesota has been given an 18-year sentence for waging a war against his neighbors using Wi-Fi hacking skills.

Minnesota hacker Barry Ardolf was sentenced to an 18-year term in a federal prison this Tuesday. Ardolf had terrorized a neighboring family for two years through a carefully planned campaign involving a hijacked Wi-Fi network to harass, frame and embarrass the next-door neighbors in every facet of their lives.

Ardolf’s obsessive passive-aggression was apparently ignited in late 2008 when his neighbors, Matt and Bethany Kostolnik, filed a police report against him. The Kostolniks had a 4-year old son who wandered over to their next-door-neighbors property shortly after moving into the Minnesota suburb of Blaine. Ardolf, 46 and a father of two, had reportedly picked the boy up carried him back to the couple and then kissed the child on the lips. Ardolf was offended when the cops were called and vowed his revenge like every good villain.

The man, a Medtronic computer technician, downloaded a Wi-Fi hacking program to tear into his neighbors WEP encryption. Ardolf created a fake Myspace page as well as several fake emails for Matt Kostolnik. The hacker then posted child porn on the Myspace page and emailed the same child porn to co-workers at Kostolnik’s law office.

To top it all off, the Blaine hacker sent death threats to Vice President Joe Biden and other politicians from Kostolnik’s Yahoo account. This granted Kostolnik a visit from the secret service who had traced the emails back to his IP address. One of the emails told Biden, “I swear to God I’m going to kill you!”

Ardolf’s mischief was detected when a frustrated Kostolnik told bosses he had no clue as to what was going on. The law office hired a firm to poke around the Wi-Fi network and install a packet sniffer to figure it all out. Eventually Ardolf’s name and Comcast account were found which gave the FBI a reason to obtain a search warrant for Ardolf’s house. They found massive evidence that led to the Blaine hacker being slapped with charges for identity theft, making threats against Biden, possession of child pornography as well as distribution of kiddie-porn.

The FBI also found evidence that Ardolf had staged a similar attack against in a family in Brooklyn Park for parking their cars in front of his house. Ardolf’s charges will tag him with lifetime-sex-offender registration requirements and after his release he’ll be supervised for 20 years. According to the Pioneer Press, he’ll also be restricted when working with computers by his parole officers.

 

Update: Due to overwhelming reader feedback, Digital Trends has removed the controversial last line of this article, which questioned whether 18 years was too long of a sentence for Ardolf. Although the line was posed as a question to spur discussion, many readers took it as an implied defense of Ardolf, which was not the original intent.

Showing 29 comments

  1. judah at 1:36pm 9th December 2011 Are you people fckn serious?????? How in the hell can you even attemp defend some one kissing somebody's kid on the lips?????who the hell cares what other country does it.....this is America dumb ass....they rape women in after before they go to war because they think that it good luck so maybe we should do that here right!!!!!! If somebody kissed my daughters on the lips they would die point blank period....who ever trying to defend it has to be a child molester .....this guy should have got life
  2. Trevor Whitlock at 1:06pm 15th July 2011 So that means Ardof(father of 2) must have molested his kids as well, remember a kiss is only sexual through intent, not the act itself, look at love and beauty, it is in the eye of the beholder, it think if the Kostolniks were real parent they would have never neglected a 4 year old to begin with and allow to wonder around without parental supervision but hey, it's not a parents fault the kid has a mind and legs, Millions of people actually supervise their kids properly everyday... Why couldnt they?
    1. Trevor Whitlock at 1:06pm 15th July 2011 Before any of you start manipulating my comment, please see above that I do not condone Ardof's actions. But if I live in Louisiana in a hurricane 3 rated town and a level 4 hurricane come through and I dont leave it is MY fault not the hurricane's, it's called preventetive maintinence. We can only account for our own actions not others or we'd all be GOD.
  3. Trevor Whitlock at 10:00am 13th July 2011 Wow touchy subject... Guy gets accused of being a pedo, reacts by making the neighbor look like a pedo, yet Casey Anthony can get away with murder and this man gets 18 years for getting revenge on a (possible)skitzo neighbor?? It's hard to believe that a pedo would be dumb enough unless they were cracked/meth'd out of their mind to "sexually" assault a child in front of the kids parents.
    1. Trevor Whitlock at 10:00am 13th July 2011 The child porn was probably easy to obtain, the internet has everything not to mention Asian countries are a fan of little boys and girls I hear. Ardoff should had done it right and paid a kid 5k to lie and say the man touched him/her sexually. Instant guilt. Final statement: Ardoff was wrong in his methods which left him vulnerable and the neighbor is just as wrong for not confronting Ardoff like a man to begin with.
      1. Trevor Whitlock at 10:04am 13th July 2011 So my question is this, can pedo's now lie and say a hacker put the porn on their comp?? America is great at screwing up laws with precident by creating loopholes, are our kids safer with this guy in jail or will this result in pedo's getting away scott free for posessing child porno?
        1. gerald2199 at 6:52pm 13th July 2011 I agree with the above comments that child abuse is bad. Personally I would go vigialante on someone who abused childred. However I don't see this as a black and white child porn case. This Adolf guy seems like some prick who probably has some pathologcial problem but seems like his motive for the CP wasn't sexual in nature. I'm not sticking up for the guy, he ruined peoples' lives I just think that its easy and gutteral to vilify someone over child porn (ironicaly much like Adolf was doing). This CP was used similar to the poo in those flaming bag of poop pranks, just to embarrass. From the information the guy didn't get off on it. It also looks like he had one picture according to the article. I'd think that someone with the despicable sexual urge for kids would have a bigger stack. Plus the guy was 46 without any previous abuse history. If you notice in case like the duggart kidnapping, there are priors for child abusers.
  4. Anon at 8:43am 13th July 2011 Kissing a child on the lips is NOT sexual or pornographic. European cultures do this, others as well. Some of my family kissed on the lips!! I(and as u would have it ,i was 3rd generation out of england by way of south america on that mouth kissing branch.) I would be worried if he did it around the side of the house where nobody could see!! (&put a littl tonguing and fondling for good measure.) NOT IN FRONT OF THE PARENTS! They guy was trying to do a good deed by bringing the kid back and the uptight neighbors WAY WAY OVERREACTED. What he did to retaliate was stupid and wrong. But they basically called him a pedophile by calling the police in the first place. They were BOTH wrong and all his punishment is too harsh. If u guys really believe this is such terrible stuff, count yourself VERY VERY lucky. There are REALLY bad people out there doing truly terrible things to make people's lives unlivable. I hope u don't run into any of them. They are the ones cunning enough NOT to get caught. They get their entire extended families involved so the police can't pin it on anyone. They can clean out an older person's home, bank accounts, everything before anyone knows what's happened. But please, don't let me interrupt your "that computer guy is such a scary man and all of them are perverts," convention.
    1. Seederman at 9:08am 13th July 2011 Well, I didn't think my reply was "convention" because I am seldom conventional. I just go by my gut and what I observe and what I know is legal and what isn't. Just like anyone. I didn't say all "computer guys" are scary perverts... But I've noticed a correlation in child porn/IT-type arrests. Face it, IT guys know more about how to procure such things than non-IT types. And there is the rub: the man procured and distributed child pornography. Without all the attendant drama, that alone is a serious federal offense, and he would be looking at some very hard time. I've seen 25 year sentences handed down for that. Toss in a threat against and elected official, another felony, and another crime that is traditionally dealt with harshly, and you've got two strikes already. Throw in stealing identities, stalking, harassment, etc. and you've got your possible third strike, which guarantees life imprisonment in many states. Then, remember that the guy is a repeat offender. Now, let's go back to kissing the boy. He didn't get 18 years for that, he wasn't charged with anything. You say the parents overreacted. However, what did the kiss reveal? How was the kiss conducted? There was something about it that made the parents uncomfortable. Are we even 100% certain he actually "found" the boy? As it turns out, the parents were right to call the cops-- the man deals in child porn and is engaged in multiple crimes at once. If I give Ardolf the benefit of every single doubt, the best I can say is he grossly and recklessly responded to the incident in a pathologically immature fashion. The big baby needs to learn that there are consequences to such actions. However, I don't give him the benefit of those doubts, because he has a pattern of criminal behavior, and these are serious offenses. Remember: it is not against the law to report a suspicious person in possession of your child to the police. So no "revenge" was warranted.
    2. Dave Vallence at 7:08pm 13th July 2011 kissing a child on the lips is pornographic if he HAS been convicted of child pornography charges. that was my point. we can only guess about his thoughts at that time but there is no way in hell i would kiss a strangers kid on the lips. i don't do it with my nieces and nephews also. we teach to kiss on the cheek here. there is no defense for what he did after it. i knew someone who was accused of being a pedo for saying he loved his daughter on his facebook status. he didnt go on a revenge spree. he just went to the person and told them off severely..they apologised for it. it's what you do that defines your life. he DID bad things. convicted of those bad things and you are defending him? yes, there is a lot of bad things going on in this world. BAD IS BAD, full stop. the neighbours didnt overreact at all. look deep in yourself and tell me you wouldnt react badly to a non family member kissing your child on the lips. familiar kissing is one thing...kissing strangers is another
  5. Seederman at 7:15am 13th July 2011 "The man may have been a nightmare to live next to, but is the 18 years in prison a bit overkill?" No, it is not overkill. He could get that just for distribution of child porn alone, never mind threatening the vice President's life, hacking, identity theft, and all the other crimes he engaged in (not once, but twice). Frankly, 18 years is going light on him. He could have earned three strikes at once with this episode and gotten life without parole. The judge gave the moron a break... It's funny how immature a lot of computer technicians are. It's funny also how many of them are busted for child porn. This guy is the latest in a long list. He's lucky he wasn't messing with me; I would have been harsher on him than the judge was. You blew it, Jeff Hughes. Ruined your objectivity and proved yourself to be a nitwit with one single line.
  6. Elatia Grimshaw at 5:55am 13th July 2011 I don't think it's too harsh. He terrorized and framed an innocent man on some really heavy stuff.
  7. Steven Koense at 5:32am 13th July 2011 Thank God I wasnt the only person to recognize the stupidity of the last line in this article.
  8. piratehousewives at 3:52am 13th July 2011 "The man may have been a nightmare to live next to, but is the 18 years in prison a bit overkill?" Oh, I don't know, Mr. Hughes... possession and technically distributing child pornography.... death threats to the VP of the United States... I think 18 years is a little slim. I'm thinking 20-25 for the child pornography charge, and another 20 at least for the death threat. Then again, perhaps Mr. Hughes condones child pornography and has no issue with anyone threatening to kill an elected official of the United States. Call me silly, but the thought of both of those things pretty much pisses me off.
    1. Ian Bell at 8:00pm 13th July 2011 You are an idiot if you think Jeff or anyone else would condone child pornography.
  9. Marty Tibbitts at 10:30am 13th July 2011 I thought overkill, until I read the article.
  10. Marty Tibbitts at 10:30am 13th July 2011 I thought overkill, until I read the article.
  11. Peter Hockley at 2:55am 13th July 2011 This guy has obviously behaved like this serially, he sounds like one very scary man.
  12. David Nakamura at 5:20am 13th July 2011 Castrate that guy, agree.. 18 is not long enough. Anyone taking security and privacy serious yet?
  13. David Nakamura at 5:20am 13th July 2011 Castrate that guy, agree.. 18 is not long enough. Anyone taking security and privacy serious yet?
  14. dang206 at 10:16pm 12th July 2011 18 years is a small price to pay. can you imagine if someone was sending child porn to your colleagues pretending to be you? Plus, anyone stupid enough to make death threats to the vice president. This guy took things to far, from the get go.
  15. Rachel Houghton at 5:02am 13th July 2011 I don't think 18 years is long enough for what he has done, if you read the entire article. It isn't just the hacking, but what he did once he hacked in.
  16. Rachel Houghton at 5:02am 13th July 2011 I don't think 18 years is long enough for what he has done, if you read the entire article. It isn't just the hacking, but what he did once he hacked in.
  17. Scott Aron Bloom at 4:54am 13th July 2011 18 years is a bit much though...
  18. Scott Aron Bloom at 4:54am 13th July 2011 18 years is a bit much though...
  19. Dave Vallence at 9:42pm 12th July 2011 obviously not overkill if you had actually re-read your own artilce. possession and distribution of child pornography. kissing the child on the lips. do the math. if he hasn't done it then he has thought about it. it is usually a small step from thought to action
  20. Adam Sharrock at 4:37am 13th July 2011 Definitely not overkill for the hacker. He deserves it for posting such sick garbage on an innocent person's fake myspace. He'll get his in prison.
  21. Jacob Berge at 4:30am 13th July 2011 reppin' MN
  22. Jacob Berge at 4:30am 13th July 2011 reppin' MN
Close Suggestion Email could use a revamp, not a replacement
View Article