These are the top 25 Wikipedia articles of 2015

By Lulu Chang Published November 21, 2017

The encyclopedia isn’t dead — it’s just changed format. While we may no longer line our shelves with hardback books lettering A through Z, human curiosity (and ingenuity) has developed a better way of cataloging information, and it goes by the name Wikipedia. The phrase may be “Google it,” but what we really mean is “Go look it up on Wikipedia,” and in 2015, people looked at a lot on the digital repository. Last year, Wikipedia logged more than 5 million articles in English, an impressive achievement nearly 15 years in the making (the site was born back in 2001). And in 2015, these were the 25 most-read articles:

Deaths in 2015 (27,885,484)
Chris Kyle (27,765,570)
Star Wars: The Force Awakens (23,523,985)
Facebook (22,330,302)
Stephen Hawking (20,060,944)
Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (19,335,481)
List of Bollywood films of 2015 (18,171,094)
Google (18,107,283)
Avengers: Age of Ultron (17,409,029)
United States (16,855,064)
Kanye West (16,478,369)
Game of Thrones (16,135,993)
Star Wars (15,580,814)
Wikipedia (15,157,792)
Furious 7 (14,740,823)
Jurassic World (14,283,010)
Donald Trump (14,052,391)
Fifty Shades of Grey (13,362,580)
Pablo Escobar (13,190,232)
India (12,864,393 )
2015 in film (12,542,233)
Floyd Mayweather, Jr. (12,436,450)
Ronda Rousey (12,298,765)
Paul Walker (12,201,471)
World War II (12,149,875)

Films seemed to pique the most interest — eight articles in the top 25 were about movies. This marks a distinct shift in readers’ interests, as just four film-related articles made the list in 2013 and 2014 combined. Previously, television shows were far more popular topics on Wikipedia, which may suggest the return of full-length features to the top of the entertainment pile. This year, just two articles were related to TV — Game of Thrones and Pablo Escobar, the subject of the Netflix hit Narcos.

Recommended Videos

Deaths in 2015, rather morbidly, took top honors, but in general, current events were very rarely searched on Wikipedia. With the exception of Donald Trump, who seemed to dominate in just about every aspect of the Internet last year, Wikipedia readers seemed less inclined to learn about the Paris attacks or ISIS. Of course, it does seem unlikely that you would get your up-to-date news from Wikipedia, so perhaps this discrepancy makes sense.

So read on, Wiki users — keep broadening those horizons in 2016 and beyond.

Former Contributor

Fascinated by the effects of technology on human interaction, Lulu believes that if her parents can use your new app…

Topics

Tech News

Computing

How to change margins in Google Docs

Laptop Working from Home

When you create a document in Google Docs, you may need to adjust the space between the edge of the page and the content -- the margins. For instance, many professors have requirements for the margin sizes you must use for college papers.

You can easily change the left, right, top, and bottom margins in Google Docs and have a few different ways to do it.

Computing

What is Microsoft Teams? The Slack rival does things other collaborative tools can’t

Tired of Slack? Try this

A man standing in a warehouse using a Surface Tablet to make a Teams video call

Looking for a place to conveniently collaborate with your team across the world? Microsoft Teams might be what you're looking for, at least if you want to avoid the cluster of group emails and chaotically coordinated phone calls beyond your working hours. Teams will allow you to work together in real time and establish clear communication across your workforce.

With Microsoft Teams, you're able to chat, video conference, share documents and edit them together, and easily coordinate schedules and workflows. Recently, Microsoft Teams did get a price bump for Microsoft Personal users (from $7 to $10), and the company also added a wave of AI agents into the mix.

Computing

Microsoft Word vs. Google Docs

A person using a laptop that displays various Microsoft Office apps.

For the last few decades, Microsoft Word has been the de facto standard for word processors across the working world. That's finally starting to shift, and it looks like one of Google's productivity apps is the heir apparent. The company's Google Docs solution (or to be specific, the integrated word processor) is cross-platform and interoperable, automatically syncs, is easily shareable, and perhaps best of all, is free.

However, using Google Docs proves it still has a long way to go before it can match all of Word's features -- Microsoft has been developing its word processor for over 30 years, after all, and millions still use Microsoft Word. Will Google Docs' low barrier to entry and cross-platform functionality win out? Let's break down each word processor in terms of features and capabilities to help you determine which is best for your needs.
How does each word processing program compare?
To put it lightly, Microsoft Word has an incredible advantage over Google Docs in terms of raw technical capability. From relatively humble beginnings in the 1980s, Microsoft has added new tools and options in each successive version. Most of the essential editing tools are available in Google Docs, but users who are used to Word will find it limited.