Skip to main content

Citing broken rules, agency boots Tesla from fatal accident investigation

Stating that Tesla violated the investigation party agreement of a fatal crash involving a Tesla Model X on March 23 in Mountain View, California, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has removed the automaker from the process. The NTSB Office of Public Affairs announced the revocation of Tesla’s party status in a news release Thursday.

Tesla was uninvited as a party to the investigation process after the electric car manufacturer publicly blamed the driver, Walter Huang, for the accident, NPR reports.

The NTSB investigation “party system” invites organizations able to give technical assistance to participate in the investigations. According to the agency, investigations generally last for 12 to 24 months.

Tesla accepted the NTSB invitation to participate with party status during the investigation of the March 23 crash. When an organization agrees to be involved with an investigation, it also agrees to follow the rules established by the NTSB.

The relevant part of the Information and Guidance for Parties to NTSB Accident and Incident Investigations agreement and the reason that Tesla is no longer an active party to this accident is section VIII, titled Release of Information.

VIII. Release of Information
Prior to the NTSB’s adoption of the final report, only appropriate NTSB personnel are authorized to publicly disclose investigative findings, and, even then, the release shall be limited to verified factual information identified during the course of the investigation. In addition, party participants or their respective organizations must refrain from providing opinions or analysis of the accident outside of the participants in the investigation. Failure to abide by these requirements may lead to removal of a party from the investigation.

That section states before the final NTSB report, investigation parties should not give public opinions or analyses to anyone not directly involved with the organization. Any party that doesn’t stick to the agreement may be removed from the investigation.

The NTSB news release summed up the change with a clear explanation:

“The NTSB took this action because Tesla violated the party agreement by releasing investigative information before it was vetted and confirmed by the NTSB. Such releases of incomplete information often lead to speculation and incorrect assumptions about the probable cause of a crash, which does a disservice to the investigative process and the traveling public.”

NPR reported an email from Tesla asserting that the company proactively withdrew from the investigation.

“Last week, in a conversation with the NTSB, we were told that if we made additional statements before their 12-24 month investigative process is complete, we would no longer be a party to the investigation agreement. On Tuesday, we chose to withdraw from the agreement and issued a statement to correct misleading claims that had been made about Autopilot — claims which made it seem as though Autopilot creates safety problems when the opposite is true.”

Tesla is still a party to ongoing investigations of a Tesla Model X crash in Lake Forest, California, on August 25, 2017, and a January 22, 2018, crash of a Tesla Model S near Culver City, California.

Editors' Recommendations

Bruce Brown
Digital Trends Contributing Editor Bruce Brown is a member of the Smart Homes and Commerce teams. Bruce uses smart devices…
Rivian R2 vs R1S: How will Rivian’s cheaper SUV compare?
The front three-quarter view of a 2022 Rivian against a rocky backdrop.

Rivian has finally unveiled the R2, its long-awaited attempt at a more affordable electric SUV. The new vehicle may not be available just yet, but fans of Rivian's design aesthetics and feature set are already looking forward to being able to order the new car. The R2 is targeted at being a more affordable take on the electric SUV and will sit alongside the flagship-tier R1S.

Let's get this out of the way right now: The R1S is most likely going to be a better vehicle than the R2. Rivian isn't replacing the R1S with the R2 — it's releasing the R2 as a more affordable alternative, and there will be some compromises when buying the R2 over the R1S.

Read more
Cybertruck production reportedly halted over pedal issue
Tesla CEO Elon Musk behind the wheel of a Cybertruck.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk behind the wheel of a Cybertruck. Tesla

Tesla’s Cybertruck has been hit by a production delay caused by an issue with a part of the vehicle, a number of media reports have claimed.

Read more
Don’t let the gimmicks fool you. The Ioniq 5 N is a serious track car
2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 N drifting.

We’re finally getting to the fun part of automakers’ methodical quest to replicate their lineups with electric cars.

Performance versions of ordinary cars have been a staple of the auto industry for decades. But while we’ve already seen some variants of EVs boasting more power and more impressive stats — think Tesla Model S Plaid or Lucid Air Sapphire — the 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 N is the first to truly apply that format to an EV.

Read more