Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Cars
  3. Emerging Tech
  4. Features

Six theories on why the Cybertruck’s bulletproof glass cracked so easily

Add as a preferred source on Google
 

“Oh my f****** god” is exactly the reaction you’re looking for when you present a revolutionary new product at a keynote event. Ideally, though, you’re hoping it’ll be spoken in rapt admiration by members of the audience; not uttered in my-net-worth-is-flashing-before-my-eyes shock by the presenter (and CEO) after a large ball bearing has broken the armor glass window his new Cybertruck. Twice.

Recommended Videos

Unfortunately, that’s the situation Tesla CEO Elon Musk found himself in during last week’s Cybertruck unveiling. But why did this happen? Here are a few possible explanations.

Start with the windows, not the door

Remember the scene from The Dark Knight when Heath Ledger’s Joker advises Batman to never start an interrogation by hitting someone in the head because the victim gets all fuzzy? Well, when it comes to carrying out an on-stage stress test of a futuristic-looking pickup truck it seems that you should start with the window before hammering the door with a sledgehammer.

At least, that’s according to Elon Musk, who claims that the reason for the broken windows was that they had already been damaged by the sledgehammer attack on the cybertruck’s door prior to having a ball bearing thrown at them.

“Sledgehammer impact on door cracked base of glass, which is why steel ball didn’t bounce off,” Musk tweeted. “Should have done steel ball on window, *then* sledgehammer the door. Next time…” This explanation would certainly explain why the windows held up fine against the ball bearing toss in rehearsals; presumably because they weren’t also being subjected to a sledgehammer assault.

Only the front windows were armor glass

Musk’s explanation makes a whole lot of sense. However, it doesn’t necessarily explain why the back window broke as well, even though only the front door panel sustained a sledgehammer battering.

A working theory here is that only the front window featured the armor glass. Tesla engineers weren’t expecting this window to be used as a demo and so didn’t install it. Musk was unaware of this and decided to use it as a backup. Needless to say, it didn’t go according to plan.

They threw the ball bearing too darn hard

People get excited when they’re up in front of a big crowd of fanboys and gals. The “throw the ball bearing at the window” test had been carried out at least five times before it was done in front of a crowd, apparently without breaking the window in the process.

But the GIF that Elon Musk shared on Twitter looks to be a decidedly slower pitch (yes, even taking into account the slow motion) than the couple carried out during the live event. During the event, Musk even says, “maybe that was a little too hard.”

On one level, this theory isn’t a theory at all: It was obviously too hard for the windows to withstand. The question is whether it was too hard in isolation, or too hard because the windows had already been damaged.

That’s what bullet proof glass does

Bullets don’t endlessly ricochet off bullet proof glass the way they do in the movies. Traditional bullet proof glass does crack on impact, but only the top layers, stopping the projectile from passing through. During his presentation, Musk did note that the ball bearing “didn’t go through,” suggesting that this is the way the windows were supposed to work.

The problems with this theory, other than Musk’s disappointed reaction? Namely that this glass is not bulletproof. The bigger hole (no pun intended) in the suggestion is that Musk has seen released footage showing how the test was meant to go. Suffice to say, it wasn’t like this.

Shouldn’t have clamped it down

Don’t judge a book by its cover. And don’t judge a window’s strength by its drop test. This point, made by many people online, observes that, while the ball bearing drop test worked, this was not an accurate metric of how strong the glass actually was in situ. For the drop test, the glass was not fully clamped down. This allowed it a degree of trampoline-like flexibility. When the windows were fitted, they had far less ability to bounce with impact.

Tesla co-founder and CEO Elon Musk stands in front of the newly unveiled all-electric battery-powered Tesla's Cybertruck
FREDERIC J. BROWN/Getty Images

One way to make them stronger would be to install small springs or shock absorbers, although this could detract from the sleek look of the vehicle. After all, how many times in day-to-day life do you have automotive engineers hurling metal balls at your vehicle? If it happens more than once or twice a year, you need to be asking yourself some tough questions.

It was all an ad for Tesla car insurance

“When life throws giant ball bearings at you, you need all the protection money can buy.” What could be a better ad for a future Elon Musk company than seeing one of the myriad hypothetical ways your fancy new Tesla could be damaged upon being driven from the showroom?

Okay, so it almost certainly isn’t actually a new line of Tesla insurance. But the idea that this could be a possible marketing stunt isn’t totally out of the question. After all, the amount of coverage a simple window break has gotten has exposed the Cybertruck to plenty of people who might otherwise not have heard of it at this point.

The impressive pre-order numbers cement the fact that, while there are no shortage of Cybertruck memes doing the rounds right now, it’s not putting people off buying it. As the man who released a music track to the late gorilla Harambi, Elon Musk has shown a mastery of memes that few in his position have. Coming a year after Musk smoked a joint on a podcast with Joe Rogan, setting up a window to “accidentally” break wouldn’t be the craziest thing Musk has ever done.

Luke Dormehl
I'm a UK-based tech writer covering Cool Tech at Digital Trends. I've also written for Fast Company, Wired, the Guardian…
Xpeng just launched a $20,800 electric SUV, and US automakers should be paying attention
China’s $20,800 Xpeng Mona L05 makes the US EV price problem look even worse
Xpeng Mona L05

Xpeng has launched the Mona L05 in China with a starting price of 139,800 yuan (around $20,800), bringing a new electric crossover with up to 635 km of claimed range, an extended-range option and a technology-heavy cabin to its mass-market lineup. While the vehicle is not confirmed for the US market, its combination of pricing, range and features offers a glimpse of the competition American automakers face as Chinese EV makers expand overseas.

The five-seat mid-size SUV is available with fully electric and extended-range electric powertrains. The launch also comes as Xpeng looks beyond China, with the company targeting 65 countries and regions for the model.

Read more
Harley-Davidson’s electric future looks bleak as LiveWire warns it may not survive
LiveWire’s sales are growing, but mounting losses have left the electric motorcycle maker searching for a financial lifeline
Livewire One

Harley-Davidson's electric motorcycle brand LiveWire has warned it may not survive the next year. Recurring losses and limited funding have raised serious doubts about its ability to keep operating, leaving Harley's electric ambitions on shaky ground.

LiveWire reported $7.9 million in third-quarter revenue alongside an $18.6 million net loss. Selling more motorcycles hasn't brought the company close to covering its costs.

Read more
China’s latest tiny EV costs just $6,735 and somehow squeezes in five doors
The four-seat Bestune Pony joins the cute-car crowd with rear doors and a price that puts its Wuling rival squarely in view
Orange car, front three-quarter

FAW's five-door Bestune Pony has launched in China from 44,900 yuan, roughly $6,735. The tiny EV packs four seats into a cheerful little box just 3.35 meters long.

It looks like something you'd buy in a gift shop, but the layout makes room for everyday chores. There are four passenger doors and a rear hatch, so getting into the back doesn't require folding a front seat out of the way.

Read more